A study of uncertainties in the sulfate distribution and its radiative forcing associated with sulfur chemistry in a global aerosol model

被引:39
作者
Goto, D. [1 ]
Nakajima, T. [1 ]
Takemura, T. [2 ]
Sudo, K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Atmosphere & Ocean Res Inst, Chiba, Japan
[2] Kyushu Univ, Appl Mech Res Inst, Fukuoka, Japan
[3] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Environm Studies, Nagoya, Aichi 4648601, Japan
关键词
COMMUNITY CLIMATE MODEL; 3-DIMENSIONAL MODEL; OPTICAL-PROPERTIES; NATIONAL CENTER; DRY DEPOSITION; AIR-QUALITY; SIMULATION; EMISSIONS; TRANSPORT; CYCLE;
D O I
10.5194/acp-11-10889-2011
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The direct radiative forcing by sulfate aerosols is still uncertain, mainly because the uncertainties are largely derived from differences in sulfate column burdens and its vertical distributions among global aerosol models. One possible reason for the large difference in the computed values is that the radiative forcing delicately depends on various simplifications of the sulfur processes made in the models. In this study, therefore, we investigated impacts of different parts of the sulfur chemistry module in a global aerosol model, SPRINTARS, on the sulfate distribution and its radiative forcing. Important studies were effects of simplified and more physical-based sulfur processes in terms of treatment of sulfur chemistry, oxidant chemistry, and dry deposition process of sulfur components. The results showed that the difference in the aqueous-phase sulfur chemistry among these treatments has the largest impact on the sulfate distribution. Introduction of all the improvements mentioned above brought the model values noticeably closer to in-situ measurements than those in the simplified methods used in the original SPRINTARS model. At the same time, these improvements also brought the computed sulfate column burdens and its vertical distributions into good agreement with other AEROCOM model values. The global annual mean radiative forcing due to the direct effect of anthropogenic sulfate aerosol was thus estimated to be -0.26 W m(-2) (-0.30 W m(-2) with a different SO2 inventory), whereas the original SPRINTARS model showed -0.18 W m(-2) (-0.21 W m(-2) with a different SO2 inventory). The magnitude of the difference between original and improved methods was approximately 50% of the uncertainty among estimates by the world's global aerosol models reported by the IPCC-AR4 assessment report. Findings in the present study, therefore, may suggest that the model differences in the simplifications of the sulfur processes are still a part of the large uncertainty in their simulated radiative forcings.
引用
收藏
页码:10889 / 10910
页数:22
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]   Global concentrations of tropospheric sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium aerosol simulated in a general circulation model [J].
Adams, PJ ;
Seinfeld, JH ;
Koch, DM .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1999, 104 (D11) :13791-13823
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Gothenburg Protocol to reduce transboundary air pollution, DOI DOI 10.5860/CHOICE.44-4512
[3]   A comparison of large-scale atmospheric sulphate aerosol models (COSAM):: overview and highlights [J].
Barrie, LA ;
Yi, Y ;
Leaitch, WR ;
Lohmann, U ;
Kasibhatla, P ;
Roelofs, GJ ;
Wilson, J ;
McGovern, F ;
Benkovitz, C ;
Mélières, MA ;
Law, K ;
Prospero, J ;
Kritz, M ;
Bergmann, D ;
Bridgeman, C ;
Chin, M ;
Christensen, J ;
Easter, R ;
Feichter, J ;
Land, C ;
Jeuken, A ;
Kjellström, E ;
Koch, D ;
Rasch, P .
TELLUS SERIES B-CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL METEOROLOGY, 2001, 53 (05) :615-645
[4]   Sulfur chemistry in the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model: Description, evaluation, features, and sensitivity to aqueous chemistry [J].
Barth, MC ;
Rasch, PJ ;
Kiehl, JT ;
Benkovitz, CM ;
Schwartz, SE .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2000, 105 (D1) :1387-1415
[5]   Aerosol direct radiative effects over the northwest Atlantic, northwest Pacific, and North Indian Oceans: estimates based on in-situ chemical and optical measurements and chemical transport modeling [J].
Bates, T. S. ;
Anderson, T. L. ;
Baynard, T. ;
Bond, T. ;
Boucher, O. ;
Carmichael, G. ;
Clarke, A. ;
Erlick, C. ;
Guo, H. ;
Horowitz, L. ;
Howell, S. ;
Kulkarni, S. ;
Maring, H. ;
McComiskey, A. ;
Middlebrook, A. ;
Noone, K. ;
O'Dowd, C. D. ;
Ogren, J. ;
Penner, J. ;
Quinn, P. K. ;
Ravishankara, A. R. ;
Savoie, D. L. ;
Schwartz, S. E. ;
Shinozuka, Y. ;
Tang, Y. ;
Weber, R. J. ;
Wu, Y. .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2006, 6 :1657-1732
[6]   Boundary layer aerosol chemistry during TexAQS/GoMACCS 2006: Insights into aerosol sources and transformation processes [J].
Bates, T. S. ;
Quinn, P. K. ;
Coffman, D. ;
Schulz, K. ;
Covert, D. S. ;
Johnson, J. E. ;
Williams, E. J. ;
Lerner, B. M. ;
Angevine, W. M. ;
Tucker, S. C. ;
Brewer, W. A. ;
Stohl, A. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2008, 113
[7]  
Bates TS, 1998, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V103, P16369, DOI 10.1029/97JD03720
[8]   EVIDENCE FOR THE CLIMATIC ROLE OF MARINE BIOGENIC SULFUR [J].
BATES, TS ;
CHARLSON, RJ ;
GAMMON, RH .
NATURE, 1987, 329 (6137) :319-321
[9]   International Global Atmospheric Chemistry (IGAC) project's first aerosol characterization experiment (ACE 1): Overview [J].
Bates, TS ;
Huebert, BJ ;
Gras, JL ;
Griffiths, FB ;
Durkee, PA .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1998, 103 (D13) :16297-16318
[10]   Nitrate aerosols today and in 2030: a global simulation including aerosols and tropospheric ozone [J].
Bauer, S. E. ;
Koch, D. ;
Unger, N. ;
Metzger, S. M. ;
Shindell, D. T. ;
Streets, D. G. .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2007, 7 (19) :5043-5059