Biomechanical effect of different interspinous devices on lumbar spinal range of motion under preload conditions

被引:19
|
作者
Hartmann, Frank [1 ,2 ]
Dietz, Sven-Oliver [2 ]
Hely, Hans [3 ]
Rommens, Pol Maria [2 ]
Gercek, Erol [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Johannes Gutenberg Univ, Klin & Poliklin Unfallchirurg, Zentrum Muskuloskeletale Chirurg, D-55101 Mainz, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Mainz, Dept Trauma Surg, Mainz, Germany
[3] Univ Appl Sci Wiesbaden, Div Phys, Wiesbaden, Germany
关键词
Interspinous device; Lumbar spine; Biomechanics; Spinal stenosis; Adjacent segment effect; ADJACENT SEGMENT DISEASE; PROCESS IMPLANT; FOLLOW-UP; FUSION; STENOSIS; SURGERY; INSTRUMENTATION; STABILIZATION; THORACOLUMBAR; DEGENERATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00402-010-1235-8
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Interspinous devices are used as an alternative to the current gold standard treatment, decompressive surgery with or without fusion, for lumbar spinal stenosis. They are supposed to limit extension and expand the spinal canal and foramen at the symptomatic level, but still allow lateral bending and axial rotation in the motion segment. The aim of the present study is the biomechanical evaluation of the change in the range of motion of the affected and adjacent segments following implantation of different interspinous devices under load in all directions of motion. Eight fresh frozen human cadaver lumbar spines (L2-L5) were tested in a spinal testing device with a moment of 7.5 nm in flexion/extension, lateral bending and rotation with and without a preload (follower load of 400 N). The ROM was measured after implantation of Aperius(A (R)) (Kyphon, Mannheim), In-Space(A (R)) (Synthes, Umkirch), X-Stop(A (R)) (Tikom, Furth) and Coflex(A (R)) (Paradigm Spine, Wurmlingen) into the segment L3/L4. All interspinous devices caused a significant reduction in extension of the instrumented segment without significantly affecting the other directions of motion. The flexion was reduced by all implants only when the follower load was applied. All devices caused a higher ROM of the whole spine during lateral bending and rotation. The actual evaluated interspinous devices led to a significant reduction in ROM during flexion-extension, but to a significant increase in ROM for the whole specimen (L2-L5) during lateral bending and rotation, which could increase the risk of adjacent segment degeneration.
引用
收藏
页码:917 / 926
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Long-term Clinical Outcomes and Quality of Life in Elderly Patients Treated with Interspinous Devices for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Miscusi, Massimo
    Trungu, Sokol
    Forcato, Stefano
    Ramieri, Alessandro
    Polli, Filippo Maria
    Raco, Antonino
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART A-CENTRAL EUROPEAN NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 79 (02) : 139 - 144
  • [43] EFFECT OF TESTING MODE ON THE BIOMECHANICAL RESPONSE OF A SPINAL MOTION SEGMENT
    KIM, YE
    GOEL, VK
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1990, 23 (03) : 289 - 291
  • [44] Biomechanical effect of vibration on the fused lumbar spine with different stabilizers
    Fan, Wei
    Zhang, Chi
    Zhan, Dan
    Guo, Li-Xin
    BIOINSPIRED BIOMIMETIC AND NANOBIOMATERIALS, 2023, 12 (01) : 24 - 28
  • [45] A comparison of two motion analysis devices used in the measurement of lumbar spinal mobility
    Mannion, A
    Troke, M
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1999, 14 (09) : 612 - 619
  • [46] EFFECTS OF PRONE SPINAL EXTENSION EXERCISE ON PASSIVE LUMBAR EXTENSION RANGE OF MOTION
    SMITH, RL
    MELL, DB
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1987, 67 (10): : 1517 - 1521
  • [47] Effects of seated lumbar extension postures on spinal height and lumbar range of motion during prolonged sitting
    Phimphasak, C.
    Swangnetr, M.
    Puntumetakul, R.
    Chatchawan, U.
    Boucaut, R.
    ERGONOMICS, 2016, 59 (01) : 112 - 120
  • [48] Hybrid Instrumentation in Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Biomechanical Evaluation of Three Different Instrumentation Techniques
    Obid, Peter
    Danyali, Reza
    Kueny, Rebecca
    Huber, Gerd
    Reichl, Michael
    Richter, Alexander
    Niemeyer, Thomas
    Morlock, Michael
    Pueschel, Klaus
    Uebeyli, Hueseyin
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 7 (01) : 47 - 53
  • [49] Biomechanical Modeling of Spine Flexibility and Its Relationship to Spinal Range of Motion and Idiopathic Scoliosis
    Wren T.A.L.
    Ponrartana S.
    Poorghasamians E.
    Moreau S.
    Aggabao P.C.
    Zaslow T.L.
    Edison B.R.
    Gilsanz V.
    Spine Deformity, 2017, 5 (4) : 225 - 230
  • [50] Surgical Role of Interspinous Distraction Devices (Coflex, DIAM) for the Treatment of Neurologic Pain and Intermittent Claudication Due to Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Lin, Jui-Feng
    Tsai, Cheng-Chia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY, 2013, 7 (04) : 226 - 230