Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for the treatment of gastric submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer: a single-center study (with video)

被引:34
作者
Meng, Fan-Sheng [1 ]
Zhang, Zhao-Hong [2 ]
Hong, Yan-Yun [3 ]
Li, De-Jian [1 ]
Lin, Jie-Qiong [1 ]
Chen, Xin [1 ]
Ji, Feng [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gastroenterol, Qingchun Rd 79, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Linyi Peoples Hosp, Dept Hematol, Jiefang Rd 27, Linyi 276300, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Qingchun Rd 79, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2016年 / 30卷 / 11期
关键词
Submucosal tumor; Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Laparoscopic wedge resection; Gastrointestinal stromal tumor; Surgery; GASTROINTESTINAL STROMAL TUMORS; SUBEPITHELIAL TUMORS; COOPERATIVE SURGERY; RESECTION; STOMACH; MANAGEMENT; ESOPHAGUS;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-016-4860-7
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been used for the treatment of gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs). This study aims to compare clinical outcomes of ESD versus laparoscopic wedge resection (LWR) for gastric SMTs. This is a retrospective cohort study. Patients with SMTs who underwent ESD or LWR were enrolled in this study at a university-affiliated hospital from January 2010 to October 2015. Preoperative endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography were performed to determine origin of layer and growth pattern. Clinical outcomes including baseline demographics, tumor size, operation time, blood loss, hospital stay, cost, pathology and postoperative complications were compared. From January 2010 to October 2015, 68 patients with SMTs received ESD and 47 patients with SMTs received LWR. There was no difference in age, gender, body mass index, origin of layer and proportion with symptoms between ESD group and LWR group. However, tumor size was significantly larger in the LWR group (37.1 mm) than in the ESD group (25.8 mm, P = 0.041). For patients with tumors smaller than 20 mm, ESD was associated with shorter mean operation time (89.7 +/- 23.5 vs 117.6 +/- 23.7 min, P = 0.043), less blood loss (4.9 +/- 1.7 vs 72.3 +/- 23.3 ml, P < 0.001), shorter length of hospital stay (3.6 +/- 1.9 vs 6.9 +/- 3.7 days, P = 0.024) and lower cost (2471 +/- 573 vs 4498 +/- 1257 dollars, P = 0.031) when compared with LWR. For patients with tumors between 20 mm and 50 mm, ESD was associated with shorter mean operation time (99.3 +/- 27.8 vs 125.2 +/- 31.5 min, P = 0.039), less blood loss (10.1 +/- 5.3 vs 87.6 +/- 31.3 ml, P < 0.001), shorter length of hospital stay (4.0 +/- 1.7 vs 7.3 +/- 4.5 days, P = 0.027) and lower cost (2783 +/- 601 vs 4798 +/- 1343 dollars, P = 0.033) when compared with LWR. There were no significant differences in terms of rates of en bloc resection, complete resection and complication and histological diagnosis regardless of tumor size. ESD can achieve similar oncological outcomes when compared with surgery for treatment of gastric SMT smaller than 50 mm.
引用
收藏
页码:5099 / 5107
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Endoscopic submucosal dissection for treatment of gastric subepithelial tumors (with video) [J].
Bialek, Andrzej ;
Wiechowska-Kozlowska, Anna ;
Pertkiewicz, Jan ;
Polkowski, Marcin ;
Milkiewicz, Piotr ;
Karpnska, Katarzyna ;
Lawniczak, Malgorzata ;
Starzynska, Teresa .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 75 (02) :276-286
[2]   Endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of gastric submucosal tumors: results from a retrospective cohort study [J].
Catalano, Filippo ;
Rodella, Luca ;
Lombardo, Francesco ;
Silano, Marco ;
Tomezzoli, Anna ;
Fuini, Arnaldo ;
Di Cosmo, Maria Antonietta ;
de Manzoni, Giovanni ;
Trecca, Antonello .
GASTRIC CANCER, 2013, 16 (04) :563-570
[3]  
Demetri GD, 2010, J NATL COMPR CANC NE, V8, pS1
[4]  
He Zhankun, 2013, Scand J Gastroenterol, V48, P1466, DOI 10.3109/00365521.2013.845796
[5]   Endoscopic submucosal dissection of large gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the esophagus and stomach [J].
He, Zhankun ;
Sun, Chao ;
Zheng, Zhongqing ;
Yu, Qingxiang ;
Wang, Tao ;
Chen, Xin ;
Cao, Hailong ;
Liu, Wentian ;
Wang, Bangmao .
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 28 (02) :262-267
[6]   Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumor dissection [J].
Hiki, N. ;
Yamamoto, Y. ;
Fukunaga, T. ;
Yamaguchi, T. ;
Nunobe, S. ;
Tokunaga, M. ;
Miki, A. ;
Ohyama, S. ;
Seto, Y. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (07) :1729-1735
[7]   Endoscopy dissection of small stromal tumors emerged from the muscularis propria in the upper gastrointestinal tract: Preliminary study [J].
Huang, Zhi-Gang ;
Zhang, Xue-Song ;
Huang, Shi-Liang ;
Yuan, Xiao-Gang .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 4 (12) :565-570
[8]   Review article: the biology, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours [J].
Iorio, N. ;
Sawaya, R. A. ;
Friedenberg, F. K. .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2014, 39 (12) :1376-1386
[9]   Endoscopic enucleation for gastric subepithelial tumors originating in the muscularis propria layer [J].
Jeong, In Du ;
Jung, Seok Won ;
Bang, Sung-Jo ;
Shin, Jung Woo ;
Park, Neung Hwa ;
Kim, Do Ha .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (02) :468-474
[10]   Risk stratification of patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumor [J].
Joensuu, Heikki .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2008, 39 (10) :1411-1419