Earnings management and the long-run market performance of initial public offerings

被引:992
作者
Teoh, SH [1 ]
Welch, I
Wong, TJ
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Sci & Technol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
10.1111/0022-1082.00079
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Issuers of initial public offerings (IPOs) can report earnings in excess of cash flows by taking positive accruals. This paper provides evidence that issuers with unusually high accruals in the IPO year experience poor stock return performance in the three years thereafter. IPO issuers in the most "aggressive" quartile of earnings managers have a three-year aftermarket stock return of approximately 20 percent less than IPO issuers in the most "conservative" quartile. They also issue about 20 percent fewer seasoned equity offerings. These differences are statistically and economically significant in a variety of specifications.
引用
收藏
页码:1935 / 1974
页数:40
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
ALI A, 1996, BIAS ANAL EARNINGS F
[2]   Detecting long-run abnormal stock returns: The empirical power and specification of test statistics [J].
Barber, BM ;
Lyon, JD .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1997, 43 (03) :341-372
[3]   Myth or reality? The long-run underperformance of initial public offerings: Evidence from venture and nonventure capital-backed companies [J].
Brav, A ;
Gompers, PA .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1997, 52 (05) :1791-1821
[4]  
Buser S., 1987, NASDAQ NMS QUALIFICA
[5]  
CHENG L, 1995, EQUITY ISSUE UNDERPE
[6]   Evidence on the characteristics of cross sectional variation in stock returns [J].
Daniel, K ;
Titman, S .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1997, 52 (01) :1-33
[7]  
DAVIDSON S, 1986, ACCOUNTING LANGUAGE
[8]  
DECHOW P, 1997, RELATION ANAL LONGTE
[9]   THE REVERSE LBO DECISION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE - THEORY AND EVIDENCE [J].
DEGEORGE, F ;
ZECKHAUSER, R .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1993, 48 (04) :1323-1348
[10]   COMMON RISK-FACTORS IN THE RETURNS ON STOCKS AND BONDS [J].
FAMA, EF ;
FRENCH, KR .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1993, 33 (01) :3-56