Emulation-accelerated Hamiltonian Monte Carlo algorithms for parameter estimation and uncertainty quantification in differential equation models

被引:7
作者
Paun, L. Mihaela [1 ]
Husmeier, Dirk [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Sch Math & Stat, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Lanark, Scotland
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Parameter estimation; Uncertainty quantification; MCMC; Emulation; Gaussian processes; Differential equations; BAYESIAN CALIBRATION; DELAYED-ACCEPTANCE; MCMC; OPTIMIZATION; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1007/s11222-021-10060-4
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
We propose to accelerate Hamiltonian and Lagrangian Monte Carlo algorithms by coupling them with Gaussian processes for emulation of the log unnormalised posterior distribution. We provide proofs of detailed balance with respect to the exact posterior distribution for these algorithms, and validate the correctness of the samplers' implementation by Geweke consistency tests. We implement these algorithms in a delayed acceptance (DA) framework, and investigate whether the DA scheme can offer computational gains over the standard algorithms. A comparative evaluation study is carried out to assess the performance of the methods on a series of models described by differential equations, including a real-world application of a 1D fluid-dynamics model of the pulmonary blood circulation. The aim is to identify the algorithm which gives the best trade-off between accuracy and computational efficiency, to be used in nonlinear DE models, which are computationally onerous due to repeated numerical integrations in a Bayesian analysis. Results showed no advantage of the DA scheme over the standard algorithms with respect to several efficiency measures based on the effective sample size for most methods and DE models considered. These gradient-driven algorithms register a high acceptance rate, thus the number of expensive forward model evaluations is not significantly reduced by the first emulator-based stage of DA. Additionally, the Lagrangian Dynamical Monte Carlo and Riemann Manifold Hamiltonian Monte Carlo tended to register the highest efficiency (in terms of effective sample size normalised by the number of forward model evaluations), followed by the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, and the No U-turn sampler tended to be the least efficient.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, ARTIF INTELL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Learning and Inference in Computational Systems Biology
[3]   ACCELERATING METROPOLIS-HASTINGS ALGORITHMS BY DELAYED ACCEPTANCE [J].
Banterle, Marco ;
Grazian, Clara ;
Lee, Anthony ;
Robert, Christian P. .
FOUNDATIONS OF DATA SCIENCE, 2019, 1 (02) :103-128
[4]   Diagnostics for Gaussian Process Emulators [J].
Bastos, Leonardo S. ;
O'Hagan, Anthony .
TECHNOMETRICS, 2009, 51 (04) :425-438
[5]  
Betancourt M, 2015, PR MACH LEARN RES, V37, P533
[6]   Bayesian calibration and uncertainty analysis for computationally expensive models using optimization and radial basis function approximation [J].
Bliznyuk, Nikolay ;
Ruppert, David ;
Shoemaker, Christine A. ;
Regis, Rommel ;
Wild, Stefan ;
Mugunthan, Pradeep .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND GRAPHICAL STATISTICS, 2008, 17 (02) :270-294
[7]  
Bowman A.W., 1997, Applied Smoothing Techniques for Data Analysis: The Kernel Approach With S-Plus Illustrations, V18, DOI DOI 10.1007/S001800000033
[8]   IMPLEMENTING SOBOLS QUASIRANDOM SEQUENCE GENERATOR [J].
BRATLEY, P ;
FOX, BL .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON MATHEMATICAL SOFTWARE, 1988, 14 (01) :88-100
[9]   General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations [J].
Brooks, SP ;
Gelman, A .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND GRAPHICAL STATISTICS, 1998, 7 (04) :434-455
[10]  
Brooks S, 2011, CH CRC HANDB MOD STA, pXIX