Evidence of Households' Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) Performance Improvement Following a WASH Education Program in Rural Dembiya, Northwest Ethiopia

被引:11
作者
Gizaw, Zemichael [1 ]
Addisu, Ayenew [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gondar, Coll Med & Hlth Sci, Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Environm & Occupat Hlth & Safety, Gondar 196, Ethiopia
[2] Univ Gondar, Coll Med & Hlth Sci, Sch Biomed Sci, Dept Parasitol, Gondar, Ethiopia
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH INSIGHTS | 2020年 / 14卷
关键词
WASH promotion; WASH education; uncontrolled before-and-after intervention study; households' WASH performance; rural Dembiya; SAFE WATER; BEHAVIOR; INTERVENTIONS; IMPACT; PROMOTION; COMMUNITY; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1177/1178630220903100
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) promotion is a viable solution to prevent enteric infections. It focuses on hygiene education, where a number of theoretical models have emerged which attempt to guide behavior change interventions. This study was, therefore, conducted to evaluate the effectiveness WASH education program on households' WASH performance in rural Dembiya, northwest Ethiopia. Method: An uncontrolled before-and-after intervention study was conducted. Baseline and endline surveys were done among 225 and 302 randomly selected households with under-5 children, respectively, using a structured questionnaire and observational checklists. Percent point change was used to see the effect of the intervention. Pearson chi(2) and Fisher exact tests were used to test for statistically significant percentage point changes on the basis of P < .05. Result: Access to adequate sanitation was significantly improved from 43.1% at the baseline to 50.7% at the endline (P < .05). Access to protected water sources was high at the baseline (73.8%) and remained high (81.1%) at the endline (P < .05). Significant proportion of households (58.3%) practiced good drinking water handling at the endline compared with the baseline (6.7%) (P < .001). Practice of home-based water treatment was improved at the endline (47%) compared with the baseline (7.6%) (P < .001). The general hygienic condition of children was significantly improved at the end of the intervention compared with the conditions before the intervention (P < .05). At the end of the intervention, mothers' hand washing practice was improved to 68.2% from 24.4% at the baseline (P < .001). Moreover, 52.4% and 69.5% of the households at the baseline and endline, respectively, had good food safety practice (P < .05). Conclusion: The proportion of households who practiced water safety, basic sanitation, good personal hygiene, and basic food safety measures significantly increased at the endline. This significant increment clearly showed that our WASH interventions were effective to improve households' WASH performance in rural Dembiya. The local health office need, therefore, strengthens the WASH education program.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Myanmar experiences in sanitation and hygiene promotion: lessons learned and future directions [J].
Bajracharya, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH, 2003, 13 :S141-S152
[2]   Effect of a behaviour-change intervention on handwashing with soap in India (SuperAmma): a cluster-randomised trial [J].
Biran, Adam ;
Schmidt, Wolf-Peter ;
Varadharajan, Kiruba Sankar ;
Rajaraman, Divya ;
Kumar, Raja ;
Greenland, Katie ;
Gopalan, Balaji ;
Aunger, Robert ;
Curtis, Val .
LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2014, 2 (03) :E145-E154
[3]   What causes sustainable changes in hygiene behaviour? A cross-sectional study from Kerala, India [J].
Cairncross, S ;
Shordt, K ;
Zacharia, S ;
Govindan, BK .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2005, 61 (10) :2212-2220
[4]   Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trials to Evaluate Adoption of Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Interventions and Their Combination in Rural Western Kenya [J].
Christensen, Garret ;
Dentz, Holly N. ;
Pickering, Amy J. ;
Bourdier, Tomoe ;
Arnold, Benjamin F. ;
Colford, John M., Jr. ;
Null, Clair .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2015, 92 (02) :437-447
[5]  
Curtis V, 2001, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V79, P518
[6]   The Integrated Behavioural Model for Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene: a systematic review of behavioural models and a framework for designing and evaluating behaviour change interventions in infrastructure-restricted settings [J].
Dreibelbis, Robert ;
Winch, Peter J. ;
Leontsini, Elli ;
Hulland, Kristyna R. S. ;
Ram, Pavani K. ;
Unicomb, Leanne ;
Luby, Stephen P. .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 13
[7]   Knowledge, attitudes, practices and implications of safe water management and good hygiene in rural Bangladesh: assessing the impact and scope of the BRAC WASH programme [J].
Fisher, Stephanie ;
Kabir, Babar ;
Lahiff, Edward ;
MacLachlan, Malcolm .
JOURNAL OF WATER AND HEALTH, 2011, 9 (01) :80-93
[8]  
Fund T., 2007, SANITATION HYGIENE D
[9]   Promoting Handwashing Behavior: The Effects of Large-scale Community and School-level Interventions [J].
Galiani, Sebastian ;
Gertler, Paul ;
Ajzenman, Nicolas ;
Orsola-Vidal, Alexandra .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2016, 25 (12) :1545-1559
[10]   The impact of sanitation interventions on latrine coverage and latrine use: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Garn, Joshua V. ;
Sclar, Gloria D. ;
Freeman, Matthew C. ;
Penakalapati, Gauthami ;
Alexander, Kelly T. ;
Brooks, Patrick ;
Rehfuess, Eva A. ;
Boisson, Sophie ;
Medlicott, Kate O. ;
Clasen, Thomas F. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYGIENE AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2017, 220 (02) :329-340