Robustness assessment of link capacity reduction for complex networks: Application for public transport systems

被引:100
作者
Cats, Oded [1 ]
Koppenol, Gert-Jaap [1 ,2 ]
Warnier, Martijn [3 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Transport & Planning, Delft, Netherlands
[2] Royal HaskoningDHV, Dept Rail Consultancy & Design, Amersfoort, Netherlands
[3] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Multiactor Syst, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Robustness; Link criticality; Vulnerability; Public transport; Network assignment; Complex networks; RESILIENCE; RELIABILITY; METHODOLOGY; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2017.07.009
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Network robustness refers to as the capacity to absorb disturbances with a minimal impact on system performance. Notwithstanding, network robustness assessment has been mostly confined to the analysis of complete link breakdown based on topological metrics. We propose reliability indicators that encompass changes in network performance with respect to the entire range of possible capacity reductions. Link criticality and degradation rapidity are measured by constructing network degradation curve that describe the relation between local capacity reduction and global change in network performance. We develop a public transport robustness assessment model which computes passenger flow distribution and network performance metrics under planned capacity reductions. The model is applied to the urban rail-bound network of Amsterdam. Link criticality and degradation rapidity are studied by performing a full-scan impact analysis which demonstrates how the robustness indicators introduced in this paper contribute to a more complete assessment of network robustness. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:544 / 553
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Freight Resilience Measures [J].
Adams, Teresa M. ;
Bekkem, Kaushik R. ;
Toledo-Duran, Edwin J. .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, 2012, 138 (11) :1403-1409
[2]   New methodology for estimating reliability in transportation networks with degraded link capacities [J].
Al-Deek, Haitham ;
Emam, Emam B. .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2006, 10 (03) :117-129
[3]   Spatial networks [J].
Barthelemy, Marc .
PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, 2011, 499 (1-3) :1-101
[4]   Resilience of public transport networks against attacks [J].
Berche, B. ;
von Ferber, C. ;
Holovatch, T. ;
Holovatch, Yu. .
EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B, 2009, 71 (01) :125-137
[5]   A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities [J].
Bruneau, M ;
Chang, SE ;
Eguchi, RT ;
Lee, GC ;
O'Rourke, TD ;
Reinhorn, AM ;
Shinozuka, M ;
Tierney, K ;
Wallace, WA ;
von Winterfeldt, D .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2003, 19 (04) :733-752
[6]   Scheduling preventive railway maintenance activities [J].
Budai, G. ;
Huisman, D. ;
Dekker, R. .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2006, 57 (09) :1035-1044
[7]   Robustness of trans-European gas networks [J].
Carvalho, Rui ;
Buzna, Lubos ;
Bono, Flavio ;
Gutierrez, Eugenio ;
Just, Wolfram ;
Arrowsmith, David .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2009, 80 (01)
[8]   Exposing the role of exposure: Public transport network risk analysis [J].
Cats, O. ;
Yap, M. ;
van Oort, N. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2016, 88 :1-14
[9]   The robustness value of public transport development plans [J].
Cats, O. .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 51 :236-246
[10]  
Cats O, 2016, TRANSPORTME IN PRESS