Will You Accept the AI Recommendation? Predicting Human Behavior in AI-Assisted Decision Making

被引:22
作者
Wang, Xinru [1 ]
Lu, Zhuoran [1 ]
Yin, Ming [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACM WEB CONFERENCE 2022 (WWW'22) | 2022年
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
AI-Assisted Human Decision Making; Behavior Model; Human-Subject Experiments; PROSPECT-THEORY; PROBABILITY; TRUST;
D O I
10.1145/3485447.3512240
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Internet users make numerous decisions online on a daily basis. With the rapid advances in AI recently, AI-assisted decision making-in which an AI model provides decision recommendations and confidence, while the humans make the final decisions-has emerged as a new paradigm of human-AI collaboration. In this paper, we aim at obtaining a quantitative understanding of whether and when would human decision makers adopt the AI model's recommendations. We define a space of human behavior models by decomposing the human decision maker's cognitive process in each decision-making task into two components: the utility component (i.e., evaluate the utility of different actions) and the selection component (i.e., select an action to take), and we perform a systematic search in the model space to identify the model that fits real-world human behavior data the best. Our results highlight that in AI-assisted decision making, human decision makers' utility evaluation and action selection are influenced by their own judgement and confidence on the decision-making task. Further, human decision makers exhibit a tendency to distort the decision confidence in utility evaluations. Finally, we also analyze the differences in humans' adoption behavior of AI recommendations as the stakes of the decisions vary.
引用
收藏
页码:1697 / 1708
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Adeogun O. A., 2008, American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Science, V4, P468
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, P 2019 CHI C HUM FAC, DOI DOI 10.1109/TED.2019
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2021, P 2021 CHI C HUM FAC
[4]   Strategic advice provision in repeated human-agent interactions [J].
Azaria, Amos ;
Gal, Ya'akov ;
Kraus, Sarit ;
Goldman, Claudia V. .
AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2016, 30 (01) :4-29
[5]  
Bansal G., 2019, P AAAI C HUM COMP CR, P2, DOI [10.1609/hcomp.v7i1.5285, DOI 10.1609/HCOMP.V7I1.5285]
[6]  
Bansal Gagan, 2019, AAAI CONF ARTIF INTE, V33, P2429
[7]  
Bansal Gagan, 2021, IS MOST ACCURATE BES
[8]   Two Reasons to Make Aggregated Probability Forecasts More Extreme [J].
Baron, Jonathan ;
Mellers, Barbara A. ;
Tetlock, Philip E. ;
Stone, Eric ;
Ungar, Lyle H. .
DECISION ANALYSIS, 2014, 11 (02) :133-145
[9]  
Budescu D.V., 2006, DECIS ANAL, V3, P145, DOI DOI 10.1287/DECA.1060.0074
[10]   You'd Better Stop! Understanding Human Reliance on Machine Learning Models under Covariate Shift [J].
Chiang, Chun-Wei ;
Yin, Ming .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH ACM WEB SCIENCE CONFERENCE, WEBSCI 2021, 2020, :120-129