The role of motivation in the association of political ideology with cognitive performance

被引:12
作者
Burger, Axel M. [1 ,2 ]
Pfattheicher, Stefan [3 ]
Jauch, Melissa [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
[2] Fraunhofer Inst Syst & Innovat Res, Karlsruhe, Germany
[3] Aarhus Univ, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Univ Basel, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
Political ideology; RWA; Cognitive performance; Cognitive reflection task; Motivation; SOCIAL-DOMINANCE ORIENTATION; RIGHT-WING AUTHORITARIANISM; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; BEHAVIORAL MEASURES; REFLECTION TEST; ABILITY; STYLE; NEED; CONSERVATIVES; PERSONALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104124
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Previous research reports a negative association between individuals' tendency to endorse right- versus left-wing socio-cultural views and performance in cognitive tasks. We hypothesized that this association results to some extent from explicit epistemic preferences and low motivation to perform well in such tasks, rather than resulting from low ability only. In two studies we found support for this hypothesis. In Study 1, we show that part of the association of right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) with performance in the cognitive reflection task (CRT) could be explained by the motivational construct of need for cognition. In Study 2, we experimentally manipulated the motivation of participants by providing (vs. not providing) monetary incentives in the CRT and documented an improvement in the performance of participants high in RWA but not of participants low in RWA. The crucial role of ideology-based motivational differences in the context of cognitive performance is discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 107 条
[21]   Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles [J].
Epstein, S ;
Pacini, R ;
DenesRaj, V ;
Heier, H .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 71 (02) :390-405
[22]   The 12 Item Social and Economic Conservatism Scale (SECS) [J].
Everett, Jim A. C. .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (12)
[23]   Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses [J].
Faul, Franz ;
Erdfelder, Edgar ;
Buchner, Axel ;
Lang, Albert-Georg .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2009, 41 (04) :1149-1160
[24]   The Political Self: How Identity Aligns Preferences With Epistemic Needs [J].
Federico, Christopher M. ;
Ekstrom, Pierce D. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 29 (06) :901-913
[25]   The Contingent, Contextual Nature of the Relationship Between Needs for Security and Certainty and Political Preferences: Evidence and Implications [J].
Federico, Christopher M. ;
Malka, Ariel .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 39 :3-48
[26]   Understanding the Determinants of Political Ideology: Implications of Structural Complexity [J].
Feldman, Stanley ;
Johnston, Christopher .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 35 (03) :337-358
[27]   Same or Different? Clarifying the Relationship of Need for Cognition to Personality and Intelligence [J].
Fleischhauer, Monika ;
Enge, Soeren ;
Brocke, Burkhard ;
Ullrich, Johannes ;
Strobel, Alexander ;
Strobel, Anja .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2010, 36 (01) :82-96
[28]   Cognitive reflection and decision making [J].
Frederick, S .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2005, 19 (04) :25-42
[29]   Liberals and conservatives are similarly motivated to avoid exposure to one another's opinions [J].
Frimer, Jeremy A. ;
Skitka, Linda J. ;
Motyl, Matt .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 72 :1-12
[30]   Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations [J].
Graham, Jesse ;
Haidt, Jonathan ;
Nosek, Brian A. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 96 (05) :1029-1046