Potential economic value of integrating concentrating solar power into power grids

被引:11
作者
Hou, Shujin [1 ]
Yi, Bo-Wen [2 ]
Zhu, Xiaomeng [2 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[2] Beihang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Electricity; Concentrating solar power; Economic dispatch; Renewable energy; Uncertainty; THERMAL-ENERGY STORAGE; CHINA; REANALYSIS; WIND;
D O I
10.1016/j.cie.2021.107554
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Increasingly, climate neutrality is becoming a consensus among many countries. While this can motivate toward higher proportions of renewable energy, it can also result in significant increases in the volatility of power systems. Concentrating solar power (CSP) combines the features of zero-emissions and dispatching capability, rendering it an ideal technology for sustainable power systems. In comparison with other clean energy generation technologies, CSP remains expensive with a levelized cost of energy (LCOE) of 0.184 $/kWh in 2018. However, in addition to LCOE, the benefits of integrating CSP for the entire power system are worth considering for a liberalized electricity market. This paper presents the development of a multistage stochastic programming model, in which the uncertainty of variable renewable energy is indicated by a modified scenario tree approach. A case study is demonstrated based on three provinces in China with different generation structures. The results demonstrate the economic value of CSP integration, which increases its investment potential-especially when combined with more variable renewables.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Energy Storage Expansion Planning In Microgrid [J].
Ahmadiahangar, Roya ;
Baharvandi, Amir ;
Rosin, Argo ;
Haring, Tobias ;
Azizi, Elnaz ;
Korotko, Tarmo ;
Shabbir, Noman .
2020 IEEE 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPATIBILITY, POWER ELECTRONICS AND POWER ENGINEERING (CPE-POWERENG), VOL 1, 2020, :433-437
[2]   A comprehensive review on uncertainty modeling techniques in power system studies [J].
Aien, Morteza ;
Hajebrahimi, Ali ;
Fotuhi-Firuzabad, Mahmud .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 57 :1077-1089
[3]  
Bousselamti L, 2019, 2019 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS AND CONTROL (ICSC'19), P449, DOI [10.1109/icsc47195.2019.8950624, 10.1109/ICSC47195.2019.8950624]
[4]  
BP, 2019, J ENERGY RES
[5]   Energy-system modelling of the EU strategy towards climate-neutrality [J].
Capros, Pantelis ;
Zazias, Georgios ;
Evangelopoulou, Stavroula ;
Kannavou, Maria ;
Fotiou, Theofano ;
Siskos, Pelopidas ;
De Vita, Alessia ;
Sakellaris, Konstantinos .
ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 134
[6]   Determination of key parameters for sizing the heliostat field and thermal energy storage in solar tower power plants [J].
Chen, Rui ;
Rao, Zhenghua ;
Liao, Shengming .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 177 :385-394
[7]  
China Electricity Council (CEC), 2019, COMP STAT DAT EL POW
[8]   Achieving China's energy and climate policy targets in 2030 under multiple uncertainties [J].
Duan, Hongbo ;
Mo, Jianlei ;
Fan, Ying ;
Wang, Shouyang .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2018, 70 :45-60
[9]   Regional disparities in emissions reduction and net trade from renewables [J].
Fell, Harrison ;
Johnson, Jeremiah X. .
NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 4 (04) :358-365
[10]   The role of the nonanticipativity constraint in commercial software for stochastic project scheduling [J].
Fernandez, AA ;
Armacost, RL ;
PetEdwards, JJA .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 1996, 31 (1-2) :233-236