Strategic scenario analysis combining dynamic balanced scorecards and statistics

被引:7
作者
Supino, Enrico [1 ]
Barnabe, Federico [2 ]
Giorgino, Maria Cleofe [2 ]
Busco, Cristiano [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Management, Rimini, Italy
[2] Univ Siena, Dept Business & Law, Business Adm, Siena, Italy
[3] LUISS Guido Carli, Rome, Italy
[4] Univ Roehampton, Accounting & Integrated Reporting, London, England
关键词
System dynamics; Balanced scorecard; Scenario analysis; Strategic decision-making; SYSTEM DYNAMICS; PERFORMANCE-MEASUREMENT; DECISION-MAKING; IMPLEMENTATION; CHALLENGES; INSIGHTS; THINKING; PROJECT; TRENDS; TOOLS;
D O I
10.1108/IJPPM-09-2018-0326
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the way in which system dynamics (SD) can enhance some key success factors of the balanced scorecard (BSC) model and support decision-makers, specifically in analyzing and evaluating the results of hypothetical scenarios. Moreover, the paper aims to emphasize the role played by statistics not only in validating the SD-based BSC, but also in increasing managers' confidence in the model reliability. Design/methodology/approach - The paper presents a case study, developed according to an action research perspective, in which a three-step approach to the BSC implementation was followed. Specifically, the first step requires the development and implementation of a "traditional" BSC, which is refined and transformed into a simulation SD model in the second step. Last, the SD-based BSC is combined with statistics to develop policy making and scenario analysis. Findings - The integration of BSC and SD modeling enables the development of a comprehensive approach to strategy formulation and implementation and, more importantly, provides a more reliable basis upon which to build and test sound cause-and-effect relationships, within a specific BSC. This paper exemplifies how an SD-based BSC can be used - and perceived reliable - to evaluate different scenarios and mutually exclusive policy effects in a multidimensional approach. In particular, this study illustrates how to forecast and depict trends for financial and non-financial indicators over the simulation period, with reference to three different scenarios. Originality/value - This paper contributes to the ongoing debate on the BSC by exploring whether a combination of SD and statistics may enhance the BSC system's advantages and facilitate its implementation process and use for decision-making and scenario analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:1881 / 1902
页数:22
相关论文
共 117 条
[81]  
Neely A., 2000, Quality Focus, V4, P3, DOI DOI 10.1108/13683040010362283
[82]  
Neely A., 1998, MEASURING BUSINESS P
[83]   Performance measurement and management frameworks Research trends of the last two decades [J].
Neetu Yadav, Sushil ;
Sagar, Mahim .
BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2013, 19 (06) :947-970
[84]  
Newing R., 1994, Accountancy, P52
[85]  
Nielsen S., 2015, Advances in Decision Sciences, V2015, P1, DOI DOI 10.1155/2015/213758
[86]   Discussing feedback system thinking in relation to scenario evaluation in a balanced scorecard setup [J].
Nielsen, Steen ;
Nielsen, Erland H. .
PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2012, 23 (06) :436-451
[87]  
Niven P., 2003, Balanced Scorecard: Step-by-step for government and nonprofit agencies
[88]   The Balanced Scorecard: what is the score? A rhetorical analysis of the Balanced Scorecard [J].
Norreklit, H .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2003, 28 (06) :591-619
[89]  
Norreklit H., 2000, Management Accounting Research, V11, P65, DOI DOI 10.1006/MARE.1999.0121
[90]   The rise of the balanced scorecard! Relevance regained? [J].
Norreklit, Hanne ;
Norreklit, Lennart ;
Mitchell, Falconer ;
Bjornenak, Trond .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE, 2012, 8 (04) :490-+