Are plankton nets a thing of the past? An assessment of in situ imaging of zooplankton for large-scale ecosystem assessment and policy decision-making

被引:15
作者
Giering, Sarah L. C. [1 ]
Culverhouse, Phil F. [2 ]
Johns, David G. [3 ]
McQuatters-Gollop, Abigail [4 ]
Pitois, Sophie G. [5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Oceanog Ctr, Ocean Biogeosci, Southampton, England
[2] Plankton Analyt Ltd, Plymouth, England
[3] Marine Biol Assoc UK, Plymouth, England
[4] Univ Plymouth, Sch Biol & Marine Sci, Plymouth, England
[5] Ctr Environm Fisheries & Aquat Sci Cefas, Lowestoft, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
in situ imaging; artificial intelligence; machine learning; taxonomy; digital samples; ecosystem assessment; long-term monitoring; zooplankton; CALANUS-FINMARCHICUS; SIZE SPECTRA; RECORDER; TIME; SEA; IDENTIFICATION; CONSISTENCY; COUNTER; SAMPLES; VISION;
D O I
10.3389/fmars.2022.986206
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Zooplankton are fundamental to aquatic ecosystem services such as carbon and nutrient cycling. Therefore, a robust evidence base of how zooplankton respond to changes in anthropogenic pressures, such as climate change and nutrient loading, is key to implementing effective policy-making and management measures. Currently, the data on which to base this evidence, such as long time-series and large-scale datasets of zooplankton distribution and community composition, are too sparse owing to practical limitations in traditional collection and analysis methods. The advance of in situ imaging technologies that can be deployed at large scales on autonomous platforms, coupled with artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) for image analysis, promises a solution. However, whether imaging could reasonably replace physical samples, and whether AI/ML can achieve a taxonomic resolution that scientists trust, is currently unclear. We here develop a roadmap for imaging and AI/ML for future zooplankton monitoring and research based on community consensus. To do so, we determined current perceptions of the zooplankton community with a focus on their experience and trust in the new technologies. Our survey revealed a clear consensus that traditional net sampling and taxonomy must be retained, yet imaging will play an important part in the future of zooplankton monitoring and research. A period of overlapping use of imaging and physical sampling systems is needed before imaging can reasonably replace physical sampling for widespread time-series zooplankton monitoring. In addition, comprehensive improvements in AI/ML and close collaboration between zooplankton researchers and AI developers are needed for AI-based taxonomy to be trusted and fully adopted. Encouragingly, the adoption of cutting-edge technologies for zooplankton research may provide a solution to maintaining the critical taxonomic and ecological knowledge needed for future zooplankton monitoring and robust evidence-based policy decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 79 条
  • [1] Challenges for the Repeatability of Deep Learning Models
    Alahmari, Saeed S.
    Goldgof, Dmitry B.
    Mouton, Peter R.
    Hall, Lawrence O.
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 211860 - 211868
  • [2] Multimodal Machine Learning: A Survey and Taxonomy
    Baltrusaitis, Tadas
    Ahuja, Chaitanya
    Morency, Louis-Philippe
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2019, 41 (02) : 423 - 443
  • [3] Capturing quantitative zooplankton information in the sea: Performance test of laser optical plankton counter and video plankton recorder in a Calanus finmarchicus dominated summer situation
    Basedow, Sunnje L.
    Tande, Kurt S.
    Norrbin, M. Fredrika
    Kristiansen, Stian A.
    [J]. PROGRESS IN OCEANOGRAPHY, 2013, 108 : 72 - 80
  • [4] CPR sampling: the technical background, materials and methods, consistency and comparability
    Batten, SD
    Clark, R
    Flinkman, J
    Hays, GC
    John, E
    John, AWG
    Jonas, T
    Lindley, JA
    Stevens, DP
    Walne, A
    [J]. PROGRESS IN OCEANOGRAPHY, 2003, 58 (2-4) : 193 - 215
  • [5] A Global Plankton Diversity Monitoring Program
    Batten, Sonia D.
    Abu-Alhaija, Rana
    Chiba, Sanae
    Edwards, Martin
    Grahams, George
    Jyothibabu, R.
    Kitchener, John A.
    Koubbis, Philippe
    McQuatters-Gollop, Abigail
    Muxagata, Erik
    Ostle, Clare
    Richardson, Anthony J.
    Robinson, Karen, V
    Takahashi, Kunio T.
    Verheye, Hans M.
    Wilson, Willie
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2019, 6
  • [6] Implications of taxon-level variation in climate change response for interpreting plankton lifeform biodiversity indicators
    Bedford, Jacob
    Johns, David G.
    McQuatters-Gollop, Abigail
    [J]. ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2020, 77 (7-8) : 3006 - 3015
  • [7] Plankton as prevailing conditions: A surveillance role for plankton indicators within the Marine Strategy Framework Directive
    Bedford, Jacob
    Johns, David
    Greenstreet, Simon
    McQuatters-Gollop, Abigail
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2018, 89 : 109 - 115
  • [8] Machine Learning Interpretability: A Survey on Methods and Metrics
    Carvalho, Diogo, V
    Pereira, Eduardo M.
    Cardoso, Jaime S.
    [J]. ELECTRONICS, 2019, 8 (08)
  • [9] New Ideas and Trends in Deep Multimodal Content Understanding: A Review
    Chen, Wei
    Wang, Weiping
    Liu, Li
    Lew, Michael S.
    [J]. NEUROCOMPUTING, 2021, 426 : 195 - 215
  • [10] Can morphology reliably distinguish between the copepods Calanus finmarchicus and C-glacialis, or is DNA the only way?
    Choquet, Marvin
    Kosobokova, Ksenia
    Kwasniewski, Slawomir
    Hatlebakk, Maja
    Dhanasiri, Anusha K. S.
    Melle, Webjorn
    Daase, Malin
    Svensen, Camilla
    Soreide, Janne E.
    Hoarau, Galice
    [J]. LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY-METHODS, 2018, 16 (04): : 237 - 252