nStudy: Software for Learning Analytics about Learning Processes and Self-Regulated Learning

被引:26
作者
Winne, Philip H. [1 ]
Teng, Kenny [1 ]
Chang, Daniel [1 ]
Lin, Michael Pin-Chuan [1 ]
Marzouk, Zahia [1 ]
Nesbit, John C. [1 ]
Patzak, Alexandra [1 ]
Rakovic, Mladen [1 ]
Samadi, Donya [1 ]
Vytasek, Jovita [1 ]
机构
[1] Simon Fraser Univ, Fac Educ, 8888 Univ Dr, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
来源
JOURNAL OF LEARNING ANALYTICS | 2019年 / 6卷 / 02期
关键词
Cognition; metacognition; self-regulated learning; trace data;
D O I
10.18608/jla.2019.62.7
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Data used in learning analytics rarely provide strong and clear signals about how learners process content. As a result, learning as a process is not clearly described for learners or for learning scientists. Gasevic, Dawson, and Siemens (2015) urged data be sought that more straightforwardly describe processes in terms of events within learning episodes. They recommended building on Winne's (1982) characterization of traces - ambient data gathered as learners study that more clearly represent which operations learners apply to which information - and his COPES model of a learning event - conditions, operations, products, evaluations, standards (Winne, 1997). We designed and describe an open source, open access, scalable software system called nStudy that responds to their challenge. nStudy gathers data that trace cognition, metacognition, and motivation as processes that are operationally captured as learners operate on information using nStudy's tools. nStudy can be configured to support learners' evolving self-regulated learning, a process akin to personally focused, self-directed learning science.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 106
页数:12
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, PSYCHOL TEST ASSESSM
[2]   Working Memory: Theories, Models, and Controversies [J].
Baddeley, Alan .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 63, 2012, 63 :1-29
[3]   Inducing Self-Explanation: a Meta-Analysis [J].
Bisra, Kiran ;
Liu, Qing ;
Nesbit, John C. ;
Salimi, Farimah ;
Winne, Philip H. .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2018, 30 (03) :703-725
[4]   Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology [J].
Dunlosky, John ;
Rawson, Katherine A. ;
Marsh, Elizabeth J. ;
Nathan, Mitchell J. ;
Willingham, Daniel T. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, 2013, 14 (01) :4-58
[5]   Let’s not forget: Learning analytics are about learning [J].
Gašević D. ;
Dawson S. ;
Siemens G. .
TechTrends, 2015, 59 (1) :64-71
[6]   Harmful Effects of Preexisting Inappropriate Highlighting on Reading Comprehension and Metacognitive Accuracy [J].
Gier, Vicki Silvers ;
Kreiner, David S. ;
Natz-Gonzalez, Amelia .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 136 (03) :287-300
[7]   Five Popular Study Strategies: Their Pitfalls and Optimal Implementations [J].
Miyatsu, Toshiya ;
Khuyen Nguyen ;
McDaniel, Mark A. .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 13 (03) :390-407
[8]  
Orlando V.P., 1989, FORUM READING, V21, P43
[9]   ROCKY ROADS TO TRANSFER - RETHINKING MECHANISMS OF A NEGLECTED PHENOMENON [J].
SALOMON, G ;
PERKINS, DN .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 1989, 24 (02) :113-142
[10]  
Winne P.H., 2017, Teachers College Record, V119, P1, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811711901312, DOI 10.1177/016146811711901312]