Emancipatory design choices for action research practitioners

被引:13
|
作者
Roberts, G
Dick, B
机构
[1] Dept Primary Ind, Longreach, Qld, Australia
[2] So Cross Univ, So Cross Inst Act Res, Lismore, NSW, Australia
关键词
action research; privileging participants; participation; practitioner choices; emancipation; resolving tensions; empowerment;
D O I
10.1002/casp.753
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The process choices made in action research can determine how emancipatory an experience it is for participants. Some choices promote an experience of emancipation. Other choices can reduce it. There can be tensions between choices that encourage emancipation and those that pursue other advantages at the expense of emancipation. Here we consider six such tensions. For each choice we suggest how to frame the tension to deliver an experience of emancipation. The suggestions involve practitioners and participants choosing the driving force for the work, acquiring and applying skills for empowerment, mixing action and research to suit the context, choosing an appropriate simplicity of methodology, planning participation, and engaging with the different beliefs of practitioners and participants. We use practitioner and researcher interchangeably. Copyright (C) 2003 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:486 / 495
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Developing an equalities literacy for practitioners working with children, young people and families through action research
    Stuart, Kaz
    Bunting, Mette
    Boyd, Pete
    Cammack, Paul
    Frostholm, Peter Hornbaek
    Graveson, David Thore
    Mikkelsen, Sidse Holvig
    Moshuus, Geir
    Walker, Steve
    EDUCATIONAL ACTION RESEARCH, 2020, 28 (03) : 362 - 382
  • [42] Participatory action research in learning commons design planning
    Brown-Sica, Margaret
    Sobel, Karen
    Rogers, Erika
    NEW LIBRARY WORLD, 2010, 111 (7-8) : 302 - 319
  • [43] Contextualizing Action Research
    Adugu, Emmanuel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADULT EDUCATION AND TECHNOLOGY-IJAET, 2021, 12 (02): : 31 - 46
  • [44] Navigating the ethical maze through design action research
    Tansley, Carole
    Kirk, Susan
    Fisher, Colin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 38 (05) : 456 - 482
  • [46] Conflicting demands and the power of defensive routines in participatory action research
    Jacobs, Gaby
    ACTION RESEARCH, 2010, 8 (04) : 367 - 386
  • [47] Patient involvement 2.0: Experience-based co-design supported by action research
    Gustavsson, Susanne M. K.
    Andersson, Thomas
    ACTION RESEARCH, 2019, 17 (04) : 469 - 491
  • [48] Promoting the use of outcome measures across disciplines through action research with practitioners in a palliative care setting
    Reynolds, Sarah
    Bannigan, Katrina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERAPY AND REHABILITATION, 2019, 26 (03)
  • [49] Transformative and emancipatory potential of intersectionality research Making a case for methodological pluralism
    Woodhams, Carol
    Lupton, Ben
    GENDER IN MANAGEMENT, 2014, 29 (05): : 301 - 307
  • [50] Configuring of Geography Lessons: Design of a Lesson Based on Action Research
    Artvinli, Eyup
    MARMARA GEOGRAPHICAL REVIEW, 2010, (21): : 184 - 218