Midazolam and pethidine versus propofol and fentanyl patient controlled sedation/analgesia for upper gastrointestinal tract ultrasound endoscopy: A prospective randomized controlled trial

被引:27
作者
Agostoni, M. [1 ]
Fanti, L. [2 ]
Arcidiacono, P. G. [2 ]
Gemma, M. [1 ]
Strini, G. [2 ]
Torri, G. [1 ]
Testoni, P. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Vita Salute Univ Milan, IRCCS San Raffaele Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, I-20132 Milan, Italy
[2] Vita Salute Univ Milan, IRCCS San Raffaele Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Milan, Italy
关键词
endoscopic ultrasonography; fentanyl; midazolam; patient controlled sedation analgesia; pethidine; propofol;
D O I
10.1016/j.dld.2007.08.004
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and objectives. The aim of this prospective, randomized study was to compare the standard regimen of midazolam and pethidine administered by the gastroenterologist versus patient controlled sedation with a propofol-fentanyl mixture during upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopic ultrasonography. Our primary end-points were patient satisfaction and patient cooperation assessed by endoscopist. Methods. Fifty-four consecutive patients, undergoing endoscopic ultrasonography, received sedation with midazolam and pethidine (Group M: n = 27) or propofol and fentanyl (Group P: n = 27). Group M: pethidine 0.7 mg/kg midazolam 0.04 mg/kg before examination; boluses of same drugs if the sedation was insufficient plus a sham patient controlled sedation analgesia; Group P: propofol 17 mg plus fentanyl 15 mu g before examination and a patient controlled sedation analgesia pump containing 170 mg propofol plus 150 mu g fentanyl injecting 0.5 ml every time the patient pressed the button (no "lock out"). Boluses of I ml of the same mixture if the sedation was insufficient. Results. Group M: mean dosage of pethidine and midazolam 88.6 and 5 mg, respectively. Group P: mean dosage of propofol and fentanyl 119.7 mg and 106 mu g, respectively. Both groups were similar for duration and difficulty of the procedure, the grade of sedation (Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Score) and judgement by endoscopist and patient about cooperation and satisfaction. The only difference between groups was about the extra boluses administered during the procedure. Conclusion. This study demonstrated that a patient controlled sedation analgesia with propofol and fentanyl is an effective and safe technique for upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopic ultrasonography procedures and results in a high level of satisfaction both for patients and operator. (c) 2007 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1024 / 1029
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Performance, patient acceptance, appropriateness of indications and potential influence on outcome of EUS:: a prospective study in 397 consecutive patients [J].
Allescher, HD ;
Rösch, T ;
Willkomm, G ;
Lorenz, R ;
Meining, A ;
Classen, M .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 50 (06) :737-745
[2]   RESULTS FROM THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY UNITED-STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION COLLABORATIVE STUDY ON COMPLICATION RATES AND DRUG-USE DURING GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY [J].
ARROWSMITH, JB ;
GERSTMAN, BB ;
FLEISCHER, DE ;
BENJAMIN, SB .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1991, 37 (04) :421-427
[3]  
*ASA, 2006, ASA GUID APPR ASA HO
[4]  
Bright E, 2003, ENDOSCOPY, V35, P683
[5]   Multicentre retrospective study on endoscopic ultrasound complications [J].
Buscarini, E. ;
De Angelis, C. ;
Arcidiacono, P. G. ;
Rocca, R. ;
Lupinacci, G. ;
Manta, R. ;
Carucci, P. ;
Repici, A. ;
Carrara, S. ;
Vallisa, D. ;
Buscarini, L. ;
Cosentino, F. ;
Pera, A. ;
Rizzetto, M. ;
Testoni, P. A. ;
Zambelli, A. .
DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2006, 38 (10) :762-767
[6]  
CHEMIK DA, 1990, J CLIN PSYCHOPHARM, V10, P244
[7]   Target-controlled propofol infusion during monitored anesthesia in patients undergoing ERCP [J].
Fanti, L ;
Agostoni, M ;
Casati, A ;
Guslandi, M ;
Giollo, P ;
Torri, G ;
Testoni, PA .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 60 (03) :361-366
[8]  
Gross JB, 2002, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V96, P1004
[9]   EVALUATION OF COMPLICATIONS DURING AND AFTER CONSCIOUS SEDATION FOR ENDOSCOPY USING PULSE OXIMETRY [J].
IBER, FL ;
SUTBERRY, M ;
GUPTA, R ;
KRUSS, D .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1993, 39 (05) :620-625
[10]   ASA CLASSIFICATION OF PHYSICAL STATUS - RECAPITULATION [J].
KEATS, AS .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1978, 49 (04) :233-236