Prognostic importance of paratracheal lymph node metastases

被引:28
作者
Plaat, RE
de Bree, R
Kuik, DJ
van den Brekel, MWM
van Hattum, AH
Snow, GB
Leemans, R
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Med Ctr, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Med Ctr, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Pathol, Med Ctr, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
squamous cell carcinoma; larynx; hypopharynx; total laryngectomy; paratracheal lymph node metastases; prognosis;
D O I
10.1097/01.MLG.0000160086.88523.C6
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of paratracheal lymph node (PTLN) metastases for tumor recurrence and survival for patients treated with total laryngectomy (TL) and PTLN dissection. Study Design: Records from 85 patients who underwent TL combined with PTLN dissection for laryngeal or hypopharyngeal carcinomas were reviewed. Results. In 20 of 85 (24%) patients, PTLN metastases were found, and in 7 patients, extranodal spread (ENS) was present in these metastases. The incidence of PTLN metastases was high in patients with hypopharyngeal or cervical esophageal (35%) and laryngeal carcinoma with subglottic extension (27%). Multivariate analysis shows that the most important prognostic factor for overall survival is the presence of PTLN metastases with ENS (P <.0005). Conclusions. Because PTLN metastases with ENS is an important prognostic factor and can only be assessed by histopathologic examination, PTLN dissection in patients with a laryngeal or hypopharyngeal tumor is important for prognostication. Key Words. Squamous cell carcinoma, larynx, hypopharynx, total laryngectomy, paratracheal lymph node metastases, prognosis.
引用
收藏
页码:894 / 898
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Significance of retropharyngeal node dissection at radical surgery for carcinoma of the hypopharynx and cervical esophagus
    Amatsu, M
    Mohri, M
    Kinishi, M
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2001, 111 (06) : 1099 - 1103
  • [2] RISK-FACTORS INVOLVED IN STOMAL RECURRENCE FOLLOWING LARYNGECTOMY
    ESTEBAN, F
    MORENO, JA
    DELGADORODRIGUEZ, M
    MOCHON, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1993, 107 (06) : 527 - 531
  • [3] HAO SP, 1995, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V121, P166
  • [4] Leon X, 1996, HEAD NECK-J SCI SPEC, V18, P54, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0347(199601/02)18:1<54::AID-HED7>3.0.CO
  • [5] 2-Y
  • [6] MANTRAVADI R, 1981, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V107, P735
  • [7] Parastomal neoplasm after laryngectomy: Etiology and therapy.
    Metternich, FU
    Brusis, T
    [J]. LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 1997, 76 (02) : 88 - 95
  • [8] Stomal recurrence after primary total laryngectomy
    Petrovic, Z
    Djordjevic, V
    [J]. CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2004, 29 (03) : 270 - 273
  • [9] POSTLARYNGECTOMY STOMAL RECURRENCE - TUMOR IMPLANTATION OR PARATRACHEAL LYMPHATIC METASTASIS
    ROCKLEY, TJ
    POWELL, J
    ROBIN, PE
    REID, AP
    [J]. CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 1991, 16 (01): : 43 - 47
  • [10] STOMAL RECURRENCE AFTER LARYNGECTOMY - INTERRELATED RISK FACTOR STUDY
    RUBIN, J
    JOHNSON, JT
    MYERS, EN
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1990, 103 (05) : 805 - 812