Accuracy of sagittal abdominal diameter as predictor of abdominal fat among Brazilian adults: a comparation with waist circumference

被引:24
|
作者
Duarte Pimentel, G. [1 ,2 ]
Portero-McLellan, K. C. [2 ,3 ]
Maesta, N. [2 ]
Corrente, J. E. [4 ]
Burini, R. C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Physiol, BR-04023062 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Sao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Dept Publ Hlth, Ctr Metab Exercise & Nutr CeMENutri, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
[3] PUC, Sch Nutr, Campinas, SP, Brazil
[4] Sao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Dept Stat, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Visceral fat; Obesity; Sagital abdominal diameter; Waist circumference; Anthropometry; VISCERAL ADIPOSE-TISSUE; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; METABOLIC SYNDROME; ANTHROPOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS; INSULIN-RESISTANCE; SUDDEN-DEATH; OBESITY; MEN; CONSEQUENCES; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.3305/nh.2010.25.4.4507
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Aim: We aim was to compare the sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD) with waist circumference (WC) as a predictor of central obesity among adults and to identify the sensitivity and specificity of the best cut-off point for SAD. Methods: A cross-sectional study of 266 Brazilians adults (euthrophic and overweight), aged 31-84 years old, of which 89 men and 177 women, was carried out. Anthropometric measurements such as SAD, weight, height, waist and hip circumferences, waist and hip ratio, body mass index, body fat percentage were performed. Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve was used to identify the sensitivity and specificity of the best cut off point for SAD as a predictor of central obesity. Statistical analysis were considered significant with a value of p < 0.05. Results: The SAD measurement was positively correlated with WC for both genders, although stronger among overweight and obesity women (r = 0.71; p < 0.001 and r = 0.79; p < 0.001, respectively) than men. ROC curves identified the best cut-off points for SAD of 23.1 cm and 20.1 cm for men and women (96% and 85% sensitivity, 86% and 84% specificity, respectively). Conclusion: SAD measurement may be used as an anthropometric tool to identify central obesity among women for presenting adequate sensitivity and specificity.
引用
收藏
页码:656 / 661
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Relationship between Waist Circumference and Abdominal Fat Measured by Ultrasonography in Healthy Adult Men
    Kawai, Katsuhisa
    Hasebe, Takehisa
    Hori, Nobuhiro
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY SCIENCE, 2012, 24 (09) : 827 - 828
  • [22] Waist Circumference Adjusted for Body Mass Index and Intra-Abdominal Fat Mass
    Berentzen, Tina Landsvig
    Angquist, Lars
    Kotronen, Anna
    Borra, Ronald
    Yki-Jarvinen, Hannele
    Iozzo, Patricia
    Parkkola, Riitta
    Nuutila, Pirjo
    Ross, Robert
    Allison, David B.
    Heymsfield, Steven B.
    Overvad, Kim
    Sorensen, Thorkild I. A.
    Jakobsen, Marianne Uhre
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (02):
  • [23] Sagittal Abdominal Diameter as a Surrogate Marker of Insulin Resistance in an Admixtured Population-Brazilian Metabolic Syndrome Study (BRAMS)
    Vasques, Ana Carolina J.
    Cassani, Roberta S. L.
    Forti, Adriana C. e
    Vilela, Brunna S.
    Pareja, Jose Carlos
    Tambascia, Marcos Antonio
    Geloneze, Bruno
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (05):
  • [24] Increasing trends in waist circumference and abdominal obesity among US adults
    Li, Chaoyang
    Ford, Earl S.
    McGuire, Lisa C.
    Mokdad, Ali H.
    OBESITY, 2007, 15 (01) : 216 - 224
  • [25] Sagittal Abdominal Diameter as the Best Predictor of Metabolic Syndrome in HIV-Infected Men on Antiretroviral Therapy
    Drvendzija, Zorka
    Galic, Biljana Srdic
    Vujanovic, Milos
    Maric, Daniela
    Jovanovic, Nina Brkic
    Brkic, Snezana
    Turkulov, Vesna
    Ilic, Dalibor
    CURRENT HIV RESEARCH, 2024, 22 (02) : 91 - 99
  • [26] Sagittal abdominal diameter shows better correlation with cardiovascular risk factors than waist circumference and BMI
    de Souza N.C.
    de Oliveira E.P.
    Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders, 12 (1)
  • [27] Correlation of Percentage Body Fat, Waist Circumference and Waist-to-Hip Ratio with Abdominal Muscle Strength
    Arif, Munazza
    Gaur, Davinder K. K.
    Gemini, Nishant
    Iqbal, Zaheen A. A.
    Alghadir, Ahmad H. H.
    HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (12)
  • [28] Sagittal abdominal diameter is a more independent measure compared with waist circumference to predict arterial stiffness in subjects with type 2 diabetes - a prospective observational cohort study
    Dahlen, Elsa M.
    Bjarnegard, Niclas
    Lanne, Toste
    Nystrom, Fredrik H.
    Ostgren, Carl J.
    CARDIOVASCULAR DIABETOLOGY, 2013, 12
  • [29] Sagittal Abdominal Diameter Is an Independent Predictor of All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in Incident Peritoneal Dialysis Patients
    Lee, Mi Jung
    Shin, Dong Ho
    Kim, Seung Jun
    Yoo, Dong Eun
    Ko, Kwang Il
    Koo, Hyang Mo
    Kim, Chan Ho
    Doh, Fa Mee
    Oh, Hyung Jung
    Park, Jung Tak
    Han, Seung Hyeok
    Yoo, Tae-Hyun
    Choi, Kyu Hun
    Kang, Shin-Wook
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (10):
  • [30] Metabolic correlates of subcutaneous and visceral abdominal fat measured by ultrasonography: a comparison with waist circumference
    Bertoli, Simona
    Leone, Alessandro
    Vignati, Laila
    Spadafranca, Angela
    Bedogni, Giorgio
    Vanzulli, Angelo
    Rodeschini, Elena
    Battezzati, Alberto
    NUTRITION JOURNAL, 2016, 15