Accuracy of sagittal abdominal diameter as predictor of abdominal fat among Brazilian adults: a comparation with waist circumference

被引:24
|
作者
Duarte Pimentel, G. [1 ,2 ]
Portero-McLellan, K. C. [2 ,3 ]
Maesta, N. [2 ]
Corrente, J. E. [4 ]
Burini, R. C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Physiol, BR-04023062 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Sao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Dept Publ Hlth, Ctr Metab Exercise & Nutr CeMENutri, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
[3] PUC, Sch Nutr, Campinas, SP, Brazil
[4] Sao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Dept Stat, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Visceral fat; Obesity; Sagital abdominal diameter; Waist circumference; Anthropometry; VISCERAL ADIPOSE-TISSUE; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; METABOLIC SYNDROME; ANTHROPOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS; INSULIN-RESISTANCE; SUDDEN-DEATH; OBESITY; MEN; CONSEQUENCES; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.3305/nh.2010.25.4.4507
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Aim: We aim was to compare the sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD) with waist circumference (WC) as a predictor of central obesity among adults and to identify the sensitivity and specificity of the best cut-off point for SAD. Methods: A cross-sectional study of 266 Brazilians adults (euthrophic and overweight), aged 31-84 years old, of which 89 men and 177 women, was carried out. Anthropometric measurements such as SAD, weight, height, waist and hip circumferences, waist and hip ratio, body mass index, body fat percentage were performed. Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve was used to identify the sensitivity and specificity of the best cut off point for SAD as a predictor of central obesity. Statistical analysis were considered significant with a value of p < 0.05. Results: The SAD measurement was positively correlated with WC for both genders, although stronger among overweight and obesity women (r = 0.71; p < 0.001 and r = 0.79; p < 0.001, respectively) than men. ROC curves identified the best cut-off points for SAD of 23.1 cm and 20.1 cm for men and women (96% and 85% sensitivity, 86% and 84% specificity, respectively). Conclusion: SAD measurement may be used as an anthropometric tool to identify central obesity among women for presenting adequate sensitivity and specificity.
引用
收藏
页码:656 / 661
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MRI sagittal abdominal diameter is a stronger predictor of metabolic syndrome than visceral fat area or waist circumference in a high-risk vascular cohort
    Hoenig, Michel R.
    VASCULAR HEALTH AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2010, 6 : 629 - 633
  • [2] Sagittal abdominal diameter and waist circumference appear to be equally good as identifiers of cardiometabolic risk
    Moller, Grith
    Ritz, Christian
    Kjolbaek, Louise
    Vuholm, Stine
    Korndal, Sanne Kellebjerg
    Larsen, Thomas Meinert
    Pedersen, Oluf
    Saris, Wim
    Astrup, Arne
    Lauritzen, Lotte
    Kristensen, Mette
    Lind, Mads Vendelbo
    NUTRITION METABOLISM AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2021, 31 (02) : 518 - 527
  • [3] Validity and reliability of the sagittal abdominal diameter as a predictor of visceral abdominal fat
    Sampaio, Lilian R.
    Simoes, Eduardo J.
    Assis, Ana Marlucia O.
    Ramos, Luiz R.
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE ENDOCRINOLOGIA E METABOLOGIA, 2007, 51 (06) : 980 - 986
  • [4] Sagittal Abdominal Diameter as a New Predictor for Incident Diabetes
    Pajunen, Pia
    Rissanen, Harri
    Laaksonen, Maarit A.
    Heliovaara, Markku
    Reunanen, Antti
    Knekt, Paul
    DIABETES CARE, 2013, 36 (02) : 283 - 288
  • [5] Population Distribution of the Sagittal Abdominal Diameter (SAD) from a Representative Sample of US Adults: Comparison of SAD, Waist Circumference and Body Mass Index for Identifying Dysglycemia
    Kahn, Henry S.
    Gu, Qiuping
    Bullard, Kai McKeever
    Freedman, David S.
    Ahluwalia, Namanjeet
    Ogden, Cynthia L.
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (10):
  • [6] Sagittal abdominal diameter: comparison with waist circumference and its prediction of metabolic syndrome
    Donini, Lorenzo M.
    Scavone, Luciano
    Savina, Claudia
    Coletti, Cecilia
    Paolini, Maddalena
    Tempera, Settimio
    Neri, Barbara
    De Felice, Maria Rosaria
    Pinto, Alessandro
    Cannella, Carlo
    MEDITERRANEAN JOURNAL OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2009, 2 (03) : 187 - 195
  • [7] Sagittal Abdominal Diameter does not Predict Metabolic Traits Better than Waist Circumference-Related Measures of Abdominal Obesity in Obese Subjects
    Zazai, Runa
    Wilms, Britta
    Ernst, Barbara
    Keppler, Rahel
    Thurnheer, Martin
    Schmid, Sebastian M.
    Schultes, Bernd
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & DIABETES, 2018, 126 (10) : 619 - 627
  • [8] Different measurements of waist circumference and sagittal abdominal diameter and their relationship with cardiometabolic risk factors in elderly men
    Anunciacao, P. C.
    Ribeiro, R. C. L.
    Pereira, M. Q.
    Comunian, M.
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 2014, 27 (02) : 162 - 167
  • [9] Different Measurements of the Sagittal Abdominal Diameter and Waist Perimeter in the Prediction of HOMA-IR
    Junqueira Vasques, Ana Carolina
    Paez de Lima Rosado, Lina Enriqueta Frandsen
    Rosado, Gilberto Paixao
    Lanes Ribeiro, Rita de Cassia
    Castro Franceschini, Sylvia do Carmo
    Geloneze, Bruno
    Priore, Silvia Eloiza
    de Oliveira, Dirce Ribeiro
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2009, 93 (05) : 473 - 479
  • [10] Sagital abdominal diameter, but not waist circumference is strongly associated with glycemia, triacilglycerols and HDL-c levels in overweight adults
    Pimentel, G. D.
    Moreto, F.
    Takahashi, M. M.
    Portero-Mclellan, K. C.
    Burini, R. C.
    NUTRICION HOSPITALARIA, 2011, 26 (05) : 1125 - 1129