Correlation Analysis of Pathological Features and Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Invasive Breast Cancer

被引:16
作者
Chen, Hongye [1 ]
Meng, Xiangchao [2 ]
Hao, Xiaopeng [1 ]
Li, Qiao [3 ]
Tian, Lin [1 ]
Qiu, Yue [1 ]
Chen, Yuhui [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Med Ctr 1, Dept Gen Surg, Beijing 100853, Peoples R China
[2] First Hosp Qinhuangdao, Gen Surg, Qinhuangdao 066600, Hebei, Peoples R China
[3] Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Med Ctr 8, Dept Mil Wounded Patient Management, Beijing 100091, Peoples R China
关键词
PREDICTION; BIOPSY; MRI;
D O I
10.1155/2022/7150304
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Objective. To investigate the risk factors of axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with invasive breast cancer. Methods. This study retrospectively included 122 cases of invasive breast cancer patients admitted to the First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital from January 2019 to September 2020. According to postoperative pathological results, axillary lymph node metastasis was divided into axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) group (n =40) and non-axillary lymph node metastasis (NALNM) group (n =82). General demographic information was collected and compared between the two groups. Collected pathological results included lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progestogen receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2), and Ki-67 detected by immunohistochemistry. Imaging parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), early enhanced rate, and time-intensity curve (TIC) were also included into univariate analysis. The variables with differences between the two groups were compared by univariate analysis, and the related factors of axillary lymph node metastasis were analyzed by logistic regression model. Results. There was no significant difference in general demographic information between the two groups. No significant differences were found in the positive rates of HER-2, ER, PR, Ki-67, pathological types, and clavicular lymph node metastasis and skin chest wall invasion between the two groups (P > 0.05). The proportion of LVI in ALNM group was significantly higher than that in NALNM group (37.50% vs. 6.10%, P < 0.001). The proportion of breast cancer on the left side in the ALNM group was higher than that in the NALNM group, and the difference was statistically significant (70.00% vs. 47.56%, P=0.019). There were no significant differences in the imaging parameters obtained by DCE-MRI between the two groups. Binary logistics regression analysis showed that LVI (OR =12.258, 95% CI =3.681-40.812, P < 0.001) and left breast cancer (OR =3.598, 95% CI =1.404-9.219, P=0.008) were risk factors for axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with invasive breast cancer. Conclusion. The formation of vascular tumor thrombi in breast cancer tissue and left breast cancer are risk factors for axillary lymph node metastasis in invasive breast cancer and might be helpful for preoperative detailed assessment of the patient's condition.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Conditional Survival of female patients with operable invasive Breast Cancer in US: A population-based study [J].
Ai, Bolun ;
Wang, Xiangyu ;
Kong, Xiangyi ;
Wang, Zhongzhao ;
Fang, Yi ;
Wang, Jing .
JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2020, 11 (19) :5782-5791
[2]  
Allarakha A, 2019, DISCOV MED, V27, P7
[3]   Machine learning prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: 2D versus 3D radiomic features [J].
Arefan, Dooman ;
Chai, Ruimei ;
Sun, Min ;
Zuley, Margarita L. ;
Wu, Shandong .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (12) :6334-6342
[4]   Lymphovascular invasion in breast cancer is associated with gene expression signatures of cell proliferation but not lymphangiogenesis or immune response [J].
Asaoka, Mariko ;
Patnaik, Santosh K. ;
Zhang, Frank ;
Ishikawa, Takashi ;
Takabe, Kazuaki .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2020, 181 (02) :309-322
[5]   Doctor, what are my chances of having a positive sentinel node? A validated nomogram for risk estimation [J].
Bevilacqua, Jose Luiz B. ;
Kattan, Michael W. ;
Fey, Jane V. ;
Cody, Hiram S., III ;
Borgen, Patrick I. ;
Van Zee, Kimberly J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (24) :3670-3679
[6]   Histopathological analysis of mucinous breast cancer subtypes and comparison with invasive carcinoma of no special type [J].
Budzik, Michal Piotr ;
Fudalej, Marta Magdalena ;
Badowska-Kozakiewicz, Anna Maria .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
[7]   Radiomics MRI for lymph node status prediction in breast cancer patients: the state of art [J].
Calabrese, Alessandro ;
Santucci, Domiziana ;
Landi, Roberta ;
Zobel, Bruno Beomonte ;
Faiella, Eliodoro ;
de Felice, Carlo .
JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 147 (06) :1587-1597
[8]   Axillary dissection in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer: Is the staging information worthwhile for patients? [J].
Chang, David W. ;
Bressel, Mathias ;
Hansen, Carmen ;
Blinman, Prunella ;
Schofield, Penelope ;
Chua, Boon H. .
ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 17 (02) :E27-E34
[9]   One-year conditional survival of dogs and cats with invasive mammary carcinomas: A concept inspired from human breast cancer [J].
Chocteau, Florian ;
Mordelet, Valentin ;
Dagher, Elie ;
Loussouarn, Delphine ;
Abadie, Jerome ;
Nguyen, Frederique .
VETERINARY AND COMPARATIVE ONCOLOGY, 2021, 19 (01) :140-151
[10]   Automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) compared to handheld ultrasound (HHUS) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) in the early assessment of breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: an emerging role to monitoring tumor response? [J].
D'Angelo, Anna ;
Orlandi, Armando ;
Bufi, Enida ;
Mercogliano, Sara ;
Belli, Paolo ;
Manfredi, Riccardo .
RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2021, 126 (04) :517-526