Forecasting stock market volatility with a large number of predictors: New evidence from the MS-MIDAS-LASSO model

被引:25
作者
Li, Xiafei [1 ]
Liang, Chao [1 ]
Ma, Feng [1 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, 111 North 1 St Sect,2nd Ring Rd, Chengdu 610031, Peoples R China
关键词
Volatility forecasting; MIDAS-RV; LASSO; Regime switching; Predictors; COVID-19; OUT-OF-SAMPLE; MONETARY-POLICY UNCERTAINTY; OIL PRICE VOLATILITY; REALIZED VOLATILITY; GEOPOLITICAL RISK; INTERNATIONAL STOCK; FINANCIAL STRESS; TRADING VOLUME; RETURNS; COMBINATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10479-022-04716-1
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper explores the effectiveness of predictors, including nine economic policy uncertainty indicators, four market sentiment indicators and two financial stress indices, in predicting the realized volatility of the S&P 500 index. We employ the MIDAS-RV framework and construct the MIDAS-LASSO model and its regime switching extension (namely, MS-MIDAS-LASSO). First, among all considered predictors, the economic policy uncertainty indices (especially the equity market volatility index) and the CBOE volatility index are the most noteworthy predictors. Although the CBOE volatility index has the best predictive ability for stock market volatility, its predictive ability has weakened during the COVID-19 epidemic, and the equity market volatility index is best during this period. Second, the MS-MIDAS-LASSO model has the best predictive performance compared to other competing models. The superior forecasting performance of this model is robust, even when distinguishing between high- and low-volatility periods. Finally, the prediction accuracy of the MS-MIDAS-LASSO model even outperforms the traditional LASSO strategy and its regime switching extension. Furthermore, the superior predictive performance of this model has not changed with the outbreak of the COVID-19 epidemic.
引用
收藏
页数:40
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]   Death and contagious infectious diseases: Impact of the COVID-19 virus on stock market returns [J].
Al-Awadhi, Abdullah M. ;
Alsaifi, Khaled ;
Al-Awadhi, Ahmad ;
Alhammadi, Salah .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL FINANCE, 2020, 27
[2]   Predictability of GCC stock returns: The role of geopolitical risk and crude oil returns [J].
Alqahtani, Abdullah ;
Bouri, Elie ;
Xuan Vinh Vo .
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2020, 68 :239-249
[3]   Impact of news-based equity market volatility on international stock markets [J].
Alqahtani, Abdullah ;
Wither, Michael J. ;
Dong, Zhankui ;
Goodwin, Kimberly R. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2020, 23 (01) :224-234
[4]   Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts [J].
Andersen, TG ;
Bollerslev, T .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1998, 39 (04) :885-905
[5]   Economic policy uncertainty and stock markets: Long-run evidence from the US [J].
Arouri, Mohamed ;
Estay, Christophe ;
Rault, Christophe ;
Roubaud, David .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 18 :136-141
[6]   The Importance of the Macroeconomic Variables in Forecasting Stock Return Variance: A GARCH-MIDAS Approach [J].
Asgharian, Hossein ;
Hou, Ai Jun ;
Javed, Farrukh .
JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2013, 32 (07) :600-612
[7]   Robust analysis for downside risk in portfolio management for a volatile stock market [J].
Ayub, Usman ;
Shah, Syed Zulfiqar Ali ;
Abbas, Qaisar .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2015, 44 :86-96
[8]   Infectious disease pandemic and permanent volatility of international stock markets: A long-term perspective [J].
Bai, Lan ;
Wei, Yu ;
Wei, Guiwu ;
Li, Xiafei ;
Zhang, Songyun .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 40
[9]  
Baker S. R., 2019, NATL BUREAU EC RES W, V25720
[10]   Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty [J].
Baker, Scott R. ;
Bloom, Nicholas ;
Davis, Steven J. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2016, 131 (04) :1593-1636