Advancing knowledge through literature reviews: 'what', 'why', and 'how to contribute'

被引:306
作者
Lim, Weng Marc [1 ,2 ]
Kumar, Satish [2 ,3 ]
Ali, Faizan [4 ]
机构
[1] Swinburne Univ Technol, Sch Business Law & Entrepreneurship, Hawthorn, Vic, Australia
[2] Swinburne Univ Technol, Fac Business Design & Arts, Jalan Simpang Tiga, Kuching 93350, Sarawak, Malaysia
[3] Malaviya Natl Inst Technol Jaipur, Dept Management Studies, Jaipur 302017, Rajasthan, India
[4] Univ S Florida, Muma Coll Business, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
关键词
Contribution to knowledge; bibliometric review; conceptual review; framework review; hybrid review; literature review; meta-analysis; meta-analytical review; meta-systematic review; method review; systematic review; thematic review; theory review; SERVICE RESEARCH; METAANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; INSIGHTS;
D O I
10.1080/02642069.2022.2047941
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Literature review is part and parcel of scholarly research. Though many literature review guides are available, they remain limited because they do not adequately account for the different types of literature review. Noteworthily, literature reviews can manifest as part of conceptual or empirical studies, or as independent studies, in which the latter may be curated in various ways. Moreover, despite its importance and popularity, literature reviews, particularly as independent studies, continue to attract unfair criticism and remain scarce in service research. To address the aforementioned gaps, this article endeavors to provide an overview and guidelines for writing literature reviews. Specifically, this article explains (1) what a literature review is and is not, (2) why literature reviews are valuable, and (3) how to conduct a literature review, as well as (4) the areas of service research and (5) the innovative ways in which literature reviews can be curated in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:481 / 513
页数:33
相关论文
共 100 条
[81]   Consumers experiencing vulnerability: a state of play in the literature [J].
Riedel, Aimee ;
Messenger, Dana ;
Fleischman, David ;
Mulcahy, Rory .
JOURNAL OF SERVICES MARKETING, 2022, 36 (02) :110-128
[82]   Searching through the jungle of innovation conceptualisations System, network and ecosystem perspectives [J].
Russo-Spena, Tiziana ;
Tregua, Marco ;
Bifulco, Francesco .
JOURNAL OF SERVICE THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2017, 27 (05) :977-1005
[83]   A systematic review of responsiveness to develop future research agenda: a TCCM and bibliometric analysis [J].
Sharma, Deepika ;
Taggar, Rashi ;
Bindra, Sunali ;
Dhir, Sanjay .
BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2020, 27 (09) :2649-2677
[84]   Customer experience research: intellectual structure and future research opportunities [J].
Silva, Jorge H. O. ;
Mendes, Glauco H. S. ;
Cauchick Miguel, Paulo A. ;
Amorim, Marlene ;
Teixeira, Jorge Grenha .
JOURNAL OF SERVICE THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2021, 31 (06) :893-931
[85]  
Singh S, 2020, SERV IND J, V40, P491, DOI [10.1007/s42399-020-00557-w, 10.1007/s42399-020-00557-w, 10.1080/02642069.2020.1731477]
[86]   Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines [J].
Snyder, Hannah .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2019, 104 :333-339
[87]   Four Decades of Frontline Service Employee Research: An Integrative Bibliometric Review [J].
Subramony, Mahesh ;
Groth, Markus ;
Hu, Xinyu 'Judy' ;
Wu, Yu .
JOURNAL OF SERVICE RESEARCH, 2021, 24 (02) :230-248
[88]   Theory of consumption values in consumer behaviour research: A review and future research agenda [J].
Tanrikulu, Ceyda .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSUMER STUDIES, 2021, 45 (06) :1176-1197
[89]  
Torraco Richard., 2010, Human Resource Development Review, V4, P356, DOI [10.1177/1534484305278283, DOI 10.1177/1534484305278283]
[90]   Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review [J].
Tranfield, D ;
Denyer, D ;
Smart, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2003, 14 (03) :207-222