Price revisited: on the growth of dissertations in eight research fields

被引:39
作者
Andersen, Jens Peter [1 ,2 ]
Hammarfelt, Bjorn [3 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Aalborg Hosp, Med Lib, Aalborg, Denmark
[2] Royal Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Aalborg E, Denmark
[3] Uppsala Univ, Dept ALM Arch Lib & Museums, Uppsala, Sweden
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
History of science; Dissertations; Publication analysis; Growth of science;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-011-0408-8
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This paper studies the production of dissertations in eight research fields in the natural sciences, the social sciences and the humanities. In using doctoral dissertations it builds on De Solla Prices seminal study which used PhD dissertations as one of several indicators of scientific growth (Price, Little science, big science, 1963). Data from the ProQuest: Dissertations and Theses database covering the years 1950-2007 are used to depict historical trends, and the Gompertz function was used for analysing the data. A decline in the growth of dissertations can be seen in all fields in the mid-eighties and several fields show only a modest growth during the entire period. The growth profiles of specific disciplines could not be explained by traditional dichotomies such as pure/applied or soft/hard, but rather it seems that the age of the discipline appears to be an important factor. Thus, it is obvious that the growth of dissertations must be explained using several factors emerging both inside and outside academia. Consequently, we propose that the output of dissertations can be used as an indicator of growth, especially in fields like the humanities, where journal or article counts are less applicable.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 383
页数:13
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1984, The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences
[3]  
Bazeley P., 1999, HIGH EDUC Q, V53, P333
[4]  
Becher T., 1989, ACAD TRIBES TERRITOR
[5]   Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index?: a comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine [J].
Bornmann, Lutz ;
Mutz, Ruediger ;
Daniel, Hans-Dieter .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 59 (05) :830-837
[6]  
De Solla Price DJ., 1963, LITTLE SCI BIG SCI, P119
[7]   CLASSIFICATION OF GROWTH-MODELS BASED ON GROWTH-RATES AND ITS APPLICATIONS [J].
EGGHE, L ;
RAO, IKR .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1992, 25 (01) :5-46
[8]   Reconsidering Price's model of scientific growth:: An overview [J].
Fernández-Cano, A ;
Torralbo, M ;
Vallejo, M .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2004, 61 (03) :301-321
[9]   Modelling the growth of literature in the area of theoretical population genetics [J].
Gupta, BM ;
Karisiddappa, CR .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2000, 49 (02) :321-355
[10]   Transition to postmodern science-related scientometric data [J].
Han, Chung-Souk ;
Lee, Su Kyung ;
England, Mark .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2010, 84 (02) :391-401