A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DNN-BASED MODELS FOR BLIND IMAGE QUALITY PREDICTION

被引:0
作者
Yang, Xiaohan [1 ]
Li, Fan [1 ]
Liu, Hantao [2 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Elect & Informat Engn, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
[2] Cardiff Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Informat, Cardiff CF243AA, Wales
来源
2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING (ICIP) | 2019年
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
deep learning; blind image quality assessment (BIQA); deep neural networks (DNN); FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1109/icip.2019.8804268
中图分类号
TB8 [摄影技术];
学科分类号
0804 ;
摘要
Recently, deep learning methods have gained substantial attention in the research community and have proven useful for blind image quality assessment (BIQA). Although previous study of deep neural networks (DNN) methods is presented, some novelty methods, which are recently proposed, are not summarized.In this paper, we provide a comparative study on the application of DNN methods for BIQA. First, we systematically analyze the existing DNN-based quality assessment methods. Then, we compare the predictive performance of various methods in synthetic and authentic databases, providing important information that can help understand the underlying properties between different methods. Finally, we describe some emerging challenges in designing and training DNN-based BIQA, along with few directions that are worth further investigations in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:1019 / 1023
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A comparative study of deep transfer learning models for malware classification using image datasets
    Ranjan, Ranjeet Kumar
    Singh, Amit
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SECURITY, 2023, 21 (3-4) : 293 - 319
  • [42] Comparative analysis of different rainfall prediction models: A case study of Aligarh City, India
    Khan, Mohd Usman Saeed
    Saifullah, Khan Mohammad
    Hussain, Ajmal
    Azamathulla, Hazi Mohammad
    RESULTS IN ENGINEERING, 2024, 22
  • [43] Image Aesthetic Assessment: A Comparative Study of Hand-Crafted & Deep Learning Models
    Anwar, Abbas
    Kanwal, Saira
    Tahir, Muhammad
    Saqib, Muhammad
    Uzair, Muhammad
    Rahmani, Mohammad Khalid Imam
    Ullah, Habib
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 101770 - 101789
  • [44] Galaxy Image Classification Based on Citizen Science Data: A Comparative Study
    Jimenez, Manuel
    Torres, Mercedes Torres
    John, Robert
    Triguero, Isaac
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 47232 - 47246
  • [45] A Comparative Study on CNN based Low-light Image Enhancement
    Lal, Kanishk Jayant
    Rana, Deepanshu
    Parihar, Anil Singh
    2021 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CLOUD COMPUTING, DATA SCIENCE & ENGINEERING (CONFLUENCE 2021), 2021, : 459 - 464
  • [46] Active Learning-Based Sample Selection for Label-Efficient Blind Image Quality Assessment
    Song, Tianshu
    Li, Leida
    Cheng, Deqiang
    Chen, Pengfei
    Wu, Jinjian
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS FOR VIDEO TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 34 (07) : 5884 - 5896
  • [47] Image Captioning Encoder–Decoder Models Using CNN-RNN Architectures: A Comparative Study
    K. Revati Suresh
    Arun Jarapala
    P. V. Sudeep
    Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing, 2022, 41 : 5719 - 5742
  • [48] An Exploratory Study on Judicial Image Quality Assessment Based on Deep Learning
    Gu, Qiqi
    Cai, Weilin
    Yu, Shengcheng
    Chen, Zhenyu
    2019 IEEE 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE QUALITY, RELIABILITY AND SECURITY (QRS 2019), 2019, : 300 - 305
  • [49] Deep learning-based affine medical image registration for multimodal minimal-invasive image-guided interventions - A comparative study on generalizability
    Strittmatter, Anika
    Schad, Lothar R.
    Zoellner, Frank G.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MEDIZINISCHE PHYSIK, 2024, 34 (02): : 291 - 317
  • [50] Which model is more efficient in carbon emission prediction research? A comparative study of deep learning models, machine learning models, and econometric models
    Xiao Yao
    Hong Zhang
    Xiyue Wang
    Yadong Jiang
    Yuxi Zhang
    Xiaohong Na
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 : 19500 - 19515