5-Aminolevulinic-acid-based fluorescence spectroscopy and conventional colposcopy for in vivo detection of cervical pre-malignancy

被引:6
作者
Vanseviciute, Rasa [1 ]
Venius, Jonas [1 ,2 ]
Zukovskaja, Olga [3 ]
Kanopiene, Daiva [1 ]
Letautiene, Simona [1 ,3 ]
Rotomskis, Ricardas [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Inst, Vilnius, Lithuania
[2] Natl Canc Inst, Lab Biomed Phys, Vilnius, Lithuania
[3] Vilnius State Univ, Fac Med, Vilnius, Lithuania
[4] Vilnius State Univ, Biophoton Grp, Laser Res Ctr, Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; 5; Aminolevulinic acid; Fluorescence diagnostics; Fluorescence spectroscopy; Protoporphyrin IX; OPTICAL BIOPSY; HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS; TREAT APPROACH; DIAGNOSIS; CANCER; NEOPLASIA; AUTOFLUORESCENCE; LESIONS; WOMEN; SEE;
D O I
10.1186/s12905-015-0191-4
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Sensitized fluorescence diagnostics are based on selective accumulation of photosensitizer in the tissue where carcinogenesis has started. The present study compared topical 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA)-based fluorescence spectroscopy (FS) in vivo with conventional colposcopy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) detection. Methods: We enrolled 48 patients who were referred for colposcopy because of high-grade changes in cervical cytology. Every inspected cervix was divided in to quadrants, and there were 174 quadrants included in the study. Each patient had a cytological smear, colposcopy, FS and histopathological analysis. For FS, 3% 5-ALA cream was used topically and after an average 135 min incubation, fluorescence spectra were recorded from the cervix in vivo. FS and colposcopy results were correlated with histopathology. Results: All spectra were evaluated by a ratio of the protoporphyrin IX fluorescence intensity at 634 nm and autofluorescence intensity at 510 nm. For proper grouping of low-risk and high-risk cases, a threshold of 3.87 was calculated. Data per quadrant showed that FS had higher sensitivity than colposcopy (71.7% vs 67.4%) but specificity was greater for colposcopy (86.6% vs 75.6%). Combination of the methods showed higher sensitivity (88.0% vs 67.4%) but reduced specificity (88.0% and 69.5%), but it had the highest number of correctly identified high-risk changes and the highest (79.3%) accuracy. Data for each patient showed FS sensitivity of 91.2%, which was greater than for colposcopy (88.2%). Higher overdiagnosis resulted in decreased specificity for fluorescence methodology-71.4% versus 78.6% for colposcopy. In both cases, accuracy was 85.4% and effectiveness was > 80%, which means that both methods can be used to determine high-risk cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. The diagnostic sensitivity of 97.1% for this complementary diagnosis indicates that it could be the best choice for detection of high-risk changes. Conclusions: 5-ALA-based FS is an objective method, requiring short-term administration for appropriate fluorescence measurements. FS is a promising diagnostic tool with similar accuracy as colposcopy but with the potential advantage of providing objective results.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[21]  
Hillemanns P, 2000, CANCER, V88, P2275, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000515)88:10<2275::AID-CNCR11>3.0.CO
[22]  
2-B
[23]   The future of medical diagnostics: review paper [J].
Jerjes, Waseem K. ;
Upile, Tahwinder ;
Wong, Brian J. ;
Betz, Christian S. ;
Sterenborg, Henricus J. ;
Witjes, Max J. ;
Berg, Kristian ;
van Veen, Robert ;
Biel, Merrill A. ;
El-Naggar, Adel K. ;
Mosse, Charles A. ;
Olivo, Malini ;
Richards-Kortum, Rebecca ;
Robinson, Dominic J. ;
Rosen, Jennifer ;
Yodh, Arjun G. ;
Kendall, Catherine ;
Ilgner, Justus F. ;
Amelink, Arjen ;
Bagnato, Vanderlei ;
Barr, Hugh ;
Bolotine, Lina ;
Bigio, Irving ;
Chen, Zhongping ;
Choo-Smith, Lin-Ping ;
D'Cruz, Anil K. ;
Gillenwater, Ann ;
Leunig, Andreas ;
MacRobert, Alexander J. ;
McKenzie, Gordon ;
Sandison, Ann ;
Soo, Khee C. ;
Stepp, Herbert ;
Stone, Nicholas ;
Svanberg, Katarina ;
Tan, I. Bing ;
Wilson, Brian C. ;
Wolfsen, Herbert ;
Hopper, Colin .
HEAD & NECK ONCOLOGY, 2011, 3
[24]  
Johansson A., 2008, Medical Laser Application, V23, P155, DOI [10.1016/j.mla.2008.08.002, DOI 10.1016/J.MLA.2008.08.002]
[25]   Role of optical spectroscopy using endogenous contrasts in clinical cancer diagnosis [J].
Liu, Quan .
WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 2 (01) :50-63
[26]   Fluorescence photodiagnosis in clinical practice [J].
Moghissi, K. ;
Stringer, M. R. ;
Dixon, Kate .
PHOTODIAGNOSIS AND PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY, 2008, 5 (04) :235-237
[27]   Human papillomavirus and disease mechanisms: relevance to oral and cervical cancers [J].
Nair, S ;
Pillai, MR .
ORAL DISEASES, 2005, 11 (06) :350-359
[28]   Characterization of autofluorescence in oral squamous cell carcinoma [J].
Onizawa, K ;
Okamura, N ;
Saginoya, H ;
Yoshida, H .
ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 39 (02) :150-156
[29]   The risk of false-positive histology according to the reason for colposcopy referral in cervical cancer screening [J].
Palma, Paolo Dalla ;
Rossi, Paolo Giorgi ;
Collina, Guido ;
Buccoliero, Anna Maria ;
Ghiringhello, Bruno ;
Lestani, Maurizio ;
Onnis, Gianlibero ;
Aldovini, Daniela ;
Galanti, Giuseppe ;
Casadei, GianPiero ;
Aldi, Mirella ;
Gomes, Vincenzo ;
Giubilato, Pamela ;
Ronco, Guglielmo .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2008, 129 (01) :75-80
[30]  
Ramanujam N, 1996, LASER SURG MED, V19, P63, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1996)19:1<63::AID-LSM8>3.0.CO