5-Aminolevulinic-acid-based fluorescence spectroscopy and conventional colposcopy for in vivo detection of cervical pre-malignancy

被引:6
作者
Vanseviciute, Rasa [1 ]
Venius, Jonas [1 ,2 ]
Zukovskaja, Olga [3 ]
Kanopiene, Daiva [1 ]
Letautiene, Simona [1 ,3 ]
Rotomskis, Ricardas [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Inst, Vilnius, Lithuania
[2] Natl Canc Inst, Lab Biomed Phys, Vilnius, Lithuania
[3] Vilnius State Univ, Fac Med, Vilnius, Lithuania
[4] Vilnius State Univ, Biophoton Grp, Laser Res Ctr, Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; 5; Aminolevulinic acid; Fluorescence diagnostics; Fluorescence spectroscopy; Protoporphyrin IX; OPTICAL BIOPSY; HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS; TREAT APPROACH; DIAGNOSIS; CANCER; NEOPLASIA; AUTOFLUORESCENCE; LESIONS; WOMEN; SEE;
D O I
10.1186/s12905-015-0191-4
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Sensitized fluorescence diagnostics are based on selective accumulation of photosensitizer in the tissue where carcinogenesis has started. The present study compared topical 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA)-based fluorescence spectroscopy (FS) in vivo with conventional colposcopy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) detection. Methods: We enrolled 48 patients who were referred for colposcopy because of high-grade changes in cervical cytology. Every inspected cervix was divided in to quadrants, and there were 174 quadrants included in the study. Each patient had a cytological smear, colposcopy, FS and histopathological analysis. For FS, 3% 5-ALA cream was used topically and after an average 135 min incubation, fluorescence spectra were recorded from the cervix in vivo. FS and colposcopy results were correlated with histopathology. Results: All spectra were evaluated by a ratio of the protoporphyrin IX fluorescence intensity at 634 nm and autofluorescence intensity at 510 nm. For proper grouping of low-risk and high-risk cases, a threshold of 3.87 was calculated. Data per quadrant showed that FS had higher sensitivity than colposcopy (71.7% vs 67.4%) but specificity was greater for colposcopy (86.6% vs 75.6%). Combination of the methods showed higher sensitivity (88.0% vs 67.4%) but reduced specificity (88.0% and 69.5%), but it had the highest number of correctly identified high-risk changes and the highest (79.3%) accuracy. Data for each patient showed FS sensitivity of 91.2%, which was greater than for colposcopy (88.2%). Higher overdiagnosis resulted in decreased specificity for fluorescence methodology-71.4% versus 78.6% for colposcopy. In both cases, accuracy was 85.4% and effectiveness was > 80%, which means that both methods can be used to determine high-risk cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. The diagnostic sensitivity of 97.1% for this complementary diagnosis indicates that it could be the best choice for detection of high-risk changes. Conclusions: 5-ALA-based FS is an objective method, requiring short-term administration for appropriate fluorescence measurements. FS is a promising diagnostic tool with similar accuracy as colposcopy but with the potential advantage of providing objective results.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Understanding diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic curves [J].
Akobeng, Anthony K. .
ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2007, 96 (05) :644-647
[2]   Advances in Optical Biopsy for Cancer Diagnosis [J].
Alfano, R. R. .
TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2011, 10 (02) :101-101
[3]   European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening. Second Edition-Summary Document [J].
Arbyn, M. ;
Anttila, A. ;
Jordan, J. ;
Ronco, G. ;
Schenck, U. ;
Segnan, N. ;
Wiener, H. ;
Herbert, A. ;
von Karsa, L. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2010, 21 (03) :448-458
[4]   Trends in cervical cancer incidence and mortality in the Baltic countries, Bulgaria and Romania [J].
Arbyn, Marc ;
Antoine, Jerome ;
Maegi, Margit ;
Smailyte, Giedre ;
Stengrevics, Aivars ;
Suteu, Ofelia ;
Valerianova, Zdravka ;
Bray, Freddie ;
Weiderpass, Elisabete .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 128 (08) :1899-1907
[5]  
Aue-aungkul A, 2011, ASIAN PAC J CANCER P, V12, P1723
[6]   Spectroscopic diagnosis and imaging of invisible pre-cancer [J].
Badizadegan, K ;
Backman, V ;
Boone, CW ;
Crum, CP ;
Dasari, RR ;
Georgakoudi, I ;
Keefe, K ;
Munger, K ;
Shapshay, SM ;
Sheets, EE ;
Feld, MS .
FARADAY DISCUSSIONS, 2004, 126 :265-279
[7]   Localization and staging of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using double ratio fluorescence imaging [J].
Bogaards, A ;
Aalders, MCG ;
Zeyl, CC ;
de Blok, S ;
Dannecker, C ;
Hillemanns, P ;
Stepp, H ;
Sterenborg, HJCM .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2002, 7 (02) :215-220
[8]   Overtreatment in a See-and-Treat Approach to Cervical Intraepithelial Lesions [J].
Bosgraaf, Remko P. ;
Mast, Peter-Paul ;
Struik-van der Zanden, Petronella H. T. H. ;
Bulten, Johan ;
Massuger, Leon F. A. G. ;
Bekkers, Ruud L. M. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 121 (06) :1209-1216
[9]  
Brookner CK, 2000, PHOTOCHEM PHOTOBIOL, V71, P730, DOI 10.1562/0031-8655(2000)071<0730:APISTC>2.0.CO
[10]  
2