Surrogate optimization of deep neural networks for groundwater predictions

被引:62
作者
Mueller, Juliane [1 ]
Park, Jangho [1 ]
Sahu, Reetik [1 ]
Varadharajan, Charuleka [2 ]
Arora, Bhavna [2 ]
Faybishenko, Boris [2 ]
Agarwal, Deborah [1 ]
机构
[1] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Computat Res Div, 1 Cyclotron Rd, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Earth & Environm Sci Area, 1 Cyclotron Rd, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
Hyperparameter optimization; Machine learning; Derivative-free optimization; Groundwater prediction; Surrogate models; DIRECT SEARCH ALGORITHMS; WATER-TABLE DEPTH; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; MODEL ALGORITHM; APPROXIMATION; ARBF;
D O I
10.1007/s10898-020-00912-0
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Sustainable management of groundwater resources under changing climatic conditions require an application of reliable and accurate predictions of groundwater levels. Mechanistic multi-scale, multi-physics simulation models are often too hard to use for this purpose, especially for groundwater managers who do not have access to the complex compute resources and data. Therefore, we analyzed the applicability and performance of four modern deep learning computational models for predictions of groundwater levels. We compare three methods for optimizing the models' hyperparameters, including two surrogate model-based algorithms and a random sampling method. The models were tested using predictions of the groundwater level in Butte County, California, USA, taking into account the temporal variability of streamflow, precipitation, and ambient temperature. Our numerical study shows that the optimization of the hyperparameters can lead to reasonably accurate performance of all models (root mean squared errors of groundwater predictions of 2 meters or less), but the "simplest" network, namely a multilayer perceptron (MLP) performs overall better for learning and predicting groundwater data than the more advanced long short-term memory or convolutional neural networks in terms of prediction accuracy and time-to-solution, making the MLP a suitable candidate for groundwater prediction.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 231
页数:29
相关论文
共 91 条
[41]  
HSU D, 2018, ARXIV170700666V3
[42]  
Ilievski I., 2017, P 31 AAAI C ART INT
[43]   Auto-Keras: An Efficient Neural Architecture Search System [J].
Jin, Haifeng ;
Song, Qingquan ;
Hu, Xia .
KDD'19: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 25TH ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2019, :1946-1956
[44]   Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions [J].
Jones, DR ;
Schonlau, M ;
Welch, WJ .
JOURNAL OF GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION, 1998, 13 (04) :455-492
[45]   A comparison of numerical and machine-learning modeling of soil water content with limited input data [J].
Karandish, Fatemeh ;
Simunek, Jiri .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2016, 543 :892-909
[46]   An Efficient Algorithm for Automatic Structure Optimization in X-ray Standing-Wave Experiments [J].
Karshoglu, Osman ;
Gehlmann, Mathias ;
Muller, Juliane ;
Nemsake, Slavomir ;
Sethian, James A. ;
Kaduwela, Ajith ;
Bluhm, Hendrik ;
Fadley, Charles .
JOURNAL OF ELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY AND RELATED PHENOMENA, 2019, 230 :10-20
[47]  
King DB, 2015, ACS SYM SER, V1214, P1, DOI 10.1021/bk-2015-1214.ch001
[48]  
Klein A, 2017, PR MACH LEARN RES, V54, P528
[49]   Rainfall-runoff modelling using Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks [J].
Kratzert, Frederik ;
Klotz, Daniel ;
Brenner, Claire ;
Schulz, Karsten ;
Herrnegger, Mathew .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2018, 22 (11) :6005-6022
[50]  
Kuderer M, 2015, IEEE INT CONF ROBOT, P2641, DOI 10.1109/ICRA.2015.7139555