How does environmental regulation affect different approaches of technical progress?-Evidence from China's industrial sectors from 2005 to 2015

被引:49
作者
Li, Chen [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Business, Changsha 410083, Hunan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental regulation; Technical progress; Technical cooperation; Technical introduction; In-house R&D; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; UNIT-ROOT TESTS; PANEL-DATA; PORTER HYPOTHESIS; PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH; INNOVATION; COMPETITIVENESS; COINTEGRATION; DETERMINANTS; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.235
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
More and more literature pays attention to the relationship between environmental regulation and technical progress. Researchers usually select patents or total R&D expenditure as a proxy for technical progress. However, researchers cannot identify R&D strategies of producers through total R&D expenditure. Moreover, external technical support, such as technical cooperation or technical introduction, cannot be patented although it can achieve technical progress. To fill this gap, the approaches to technical progress need to be reidentified and new measurements made. This study considers three approaches to technical progress: technical cooperation, technical introduction, and in-house R&D. The impacts of environmental regulation on the three approaches are examined based on data from China's industrial sectors from 2005 to 2015. The findings show that environmental regulation has a significant negative impact on technical cooperation and technical introduction, but no impact on in-house R&D. In highly polluting sectors, environmental regulation has a significant negative impact on all three approaches. There is no significant impact of environmental regulation on the three approaches in low polluting sectors. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:572 / 580
页数:9
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Alarcón S, 2014, NEW MEDIT, V13, P23
[2]   The mediating role of an innovative culture in the relationship between absorptive capacity and technical and non-technical innovation [J].
Ali, Murad ;
Park, Kichan .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2016, 69 (05) :1669-1675
[3]   Productivity growth and environmental regulation in Mexican and US food manufacturing [J].
Alpay, E ;
Buccola, S ;
Kerkvliet, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 84 (04) :887-901
[4]   A theoretical foundation of the Porter hypothesis [J].
Ambec, S ;
Barla, P .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2002, 75 (03) :355-360
[5]   The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness? [J].
Ambec, Stefan ;
Cohen, Mark A. ;
Elgie, Stewart ;
Lanoie, Paul .
REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2013, 7 (01) :2-22
[6]  
[Anonymous], CHIN STAT YB SCI TEC
[7]  
[Anonymous], TECHNOL ANAL STRAT M
[8]  
[Anonymous], CONT CHINA HIST STUD
[9]  
[Anonymous], RES POLICY
[10]   Testing for PPP: Should we use panel methods? [J].
Banerjee, A ;
Marcellino, M ;
Osbat, C .
EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 30 (01) :77-91