A systemic review for measuring circular economy with multi-criteria methods

被引:32
作者
dos Santos Goncalves, Paulo Vitor [1 ]
Campos, Lucila M. S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Santa Catarina UFSC, Grad Program Prod Engn PPGEP, Campus Univ Trindade, BR-88062451 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Santa Catarina UFSC, Dept Prod Engn EPS, Campus Univ Trindade, BR-88062451 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
关键词
Circular economy; Indicators; Circularity; Decision-making; Implementation; Multi-criteria; OF-THE-ART; DECISION-MAKING; WASTE MANAGEMENT; FOOD WASTE; SUSTAINABILITY; INDICATORS; ENERGY; MCDM; PERFORMANCE; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-18580-w
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Determining the circularity of a system through a criteria and indicators approach has been the focus of research in many branches of science. In this way, this work aims to review multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods employed for measuring circular economy (CE) indicators and CE aspects at different levels (micro, meso, and macro). For this purpose, a systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted in ISI Web of Science and Scopus databases. Further, the results summarized 22 MCDM techniques, 27 CE aspects, and 36 CE indicators The SLR provides a concept map highlighting the relation of the level of circularity implementation (subdivided into micro-, meso-, and macro-levels) and MCDM techniques and demonstrates the interaction between CE aspects and indicators. The review provides an outline as to how MCDM techniques can solve problems related to CE aspects and marks the relevance in the use of CE indicators to support circularity aspects and to construct criteria in the methodologies applied.
引用
收藏
页码:31597 / 31611
页数:15
相关论文
共 88 条
[31]   Industry 4.0, cleaner production and circular economy: An integrative framework for evaluating ethical and sustainable business performance of manufacturing organizations [J].
Gupta, Himanshu ;
Kumar, Ashwani ;
Wasan, Pratibha .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 295
[32]   Measuring the environmental sustainability of a circular economy [J].
Haupt, Melanie ;
Hellweg, Stefanie .
ENVIRONMENTAL AND SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS, 2019, 1-2
[33]   Reshaping WEEE management in Australia: An investigation on the untapped WEEE products [J].
Islam, Md Tasbirul ;
Huda, Nazmul .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 250
[34]   Environmental Criteria for Assessing the Competitiveness of Public Tenders with the Replacement of Large-Scale LEDs in the Outdoor Lighting of Cities as a Key Element for Sustainable Development: Case Study Applied with PROMETHEE Methodology [J].
Jesus Hermoso-Orzaez, Manuel ;
Adolfo Lozano-Miralles, Jose ;
Lopez-Garcia, Rafael ;
Brito, Paulo .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (21)
[35]   How Circular Are the European Economies? A Taxonomic Analysis Based on the INEC (Index of National Economies' Circularity) [J].
Kasztelan, Armand .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (18)
[36]   Multi-Criteria Analysis of Potential Applications of Waste from Rock Minerals Mining [J].
Kazmierczak, Urszula ;
Blachowski, Jan ;
Gorniak-Zimroz, Justyna .
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2019, 9 (03)
[37]   Quantitative and Qualitative Research on the Waste from the Mining of Rock Raw Materials in Lower Silesia [J].
Kazmierczak, Urszula ;
Blachowski, Jan ;
Gorniak-Zimroz, Justyna ;
Wirth, Herbert .
MINERALS, 2018, 8 (09)
[38]   GIS- and MCD-based suitability assessment for optimized location of solid waste landfills in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania [J].
Kazuva, Emmanuel ;
Zhang, Jiquan ;
Tong, Zhijun ;
Liu, Xing-Peng ;
Memon, Shumaila ;
Mhache, Emmanuel .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (09) :11259-11278
[39]   Waste-to-energy generation technologies and the developing economies: A multi-criteria analysis for sustainability assessment [J].
Khan, Imran ;
Kabir, Zobaidul .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 150 :320-333
[40]   A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development [J].
Kumar, Abhishek ;
Sah, Bikash ;
Singh, Arvind R. ;
Deng, Yan ;
He, Xiangning ;
Kumar, Praveen ;
Bansal, R. C. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 69 :596-609