Development and perceptions of an academic success tool for pharmacy students

被引:1
作者
Pitts, Merideth [1 ]
Smith, Nathanael J. [1 ]
Bates, Jeffrey A. [1 ]
Stevenson, Rachel [1 ]
Fohner, Amy M. [1 ]
Moser, Haylee M. [1 ]
Pahl, Brenda [1 ]
Chen, Aleda M. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cedarville Univ, Pharm Practice, Sch Pharm, 251 N Main St, Cedarville, OH 45314 USA
关键词
Academic literacy; At-risk student; Reading comprehension; Academic success; Interdisciplinary research; SPEAKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.08.012
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: Some students may face challenges with graduate-level reading and writing, particularly in certain active learning pedagogies, such as team-based learning or peer instruction, which require extensive pre-reading. The objective of this study is to determine the perceived utility of an academic literacy (reading/writing) test for first professional year student pharmacists (P1s).Methods: In a collaboration between pharmacy and linguistics faculty, an academic literacy assessment tool was developed using fall P1 course materials. After pilot testing and adjustments, the revised test was administered to all P1 students by trained facilitators, then scored. Students needing literacy support were identified, met with individually to debrief on the assessment, and offered a year-long, one-on-one tutoring program. P1 faculty participated in an end-of-semester focus group session to determine whether the assessment correctly identified students who benefited from literacy support, and to decide on the impact of subsequent support. Thematic analysis was performed on the data.Results: A total of 13 students were identified as at-risk through the assessment. Since tutoring was optional, eight students met at least once, and two students met weekly during the ensuing semester. Faculty from the end-of semester focus group 1) stated that the assessment accurately pre-identified students who struggled with literacy components of P1 coursework, and 2) expressed a wish for earlier identification of students with required instead of optional tutoring.Conclusions: Faculty perceived that the tool accurately identified students, but the timing and the volunteer nature of the follow-up tutoring limited the success of the assessment effort.
引用
收藏
页码:3131 / 3136
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education, 2016, ACCREDITATION STANDA
[2]  
Adrian JAL, 2015, AM J PHARM EDUC, V79
[3]   Speaking my patient's language: bilingual nurses' perspective about provision of language concordant care to patients with limited English proficiency [J].
Ali, Parveen Azam ;
Johnson, Stacy .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2017, 73 (02) :421-432
[4]  
Bachman L. F., 2010, Language testing in practice
[5]  
Cailor SM, 2017, CURR PHARM TEACH LEA, V9, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.cptl.2016.08.031
[6]   Never Let a Crisis Go to Waste: Large-Scale Assessment and the Response to COVID-19 [J].
Camara, Wayne .
EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT-ISSUES AND PRACTICE, 2020, 39 (03) :10-18
[7]  
Chapelle CA, 2008, ESL APPL LING PROF, P1
[8]   The Hispanic pharmacist: Value beyond a common language [J].
Cipriano, Gabriela C. ;
Andrews, Carlota O. .
SAGE OPEN MEDICINE, 2015, 3
[9]   Native English speakers and English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students' performance and notetaking in a Doctor of Pharmacy health systems course [J].
Desselle, Shane P. ;
Shane, Patricia A. .
RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2019, 15 (09) :1154-1159
[10]   Writing skills of advanced pharmacy practice experience students whose first or best language is not english [J].
Diaz-Gilbert, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2005, 69 (05)