Detection of Recurrent Prostate Carcinoma with anti-1-Amino-3-18F-Fluorocyclobutane-1-Carboxylic Acid PET/CT and 111In-Capromab Pendetide SPECT/CT

被引:130
作者
Schuster, David M. [1 ]
Savir-Baruch, Bital [1 ]
Nieh, Peter T. [2 ]
Master, Viraj A. [2 ]
Halkar, Raghuveer K. [1 ]
Rossi, Peter J. [3 ]
Lewis, Melinda M. [4 ]
Nye, Jonathon A. [1 ]
Yu, Weiping [1 ]
Bowman, F. DuBois [5 ]
Goodman, Mark M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Emory Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[3] Emory Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[4] Emory Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[5] Emory Univ Hosp, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; LYMPH-NODE METASTASES; IN-111 CAPROMAB PENDETIDE; INDIUM-111-CAPROMAB PENDETIDE; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; SALVAGE RADIOTHERAPY; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; LOCAL RECURRENCE; ANTIGEN RELAPSE; CANCER;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.11102023
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the diagnostic performance of the synthetic amino acid analog radiotracer anti-1-amino-3-fluorine 18-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid (anti-3-F-18-FACBC) with that of indium 111 (In-111)-capromab pendetide in the detection of recurrent prostate carcinoma. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was approved by the institutional review board and complied with HIPAA guidelines. Written informed consent was obtained. Fifty patients (mean age, 68.3 years +/- 8.1 [standard deviation]; age range, 50-90 years) were included in the study on the basis of the following criteria: (a) Recurrence of prostate carcinoma was suspected after definitive therapy for localized disease, (b) bone scans were negative, and (c) anti-3-F-18-FACBC positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) and In-111-capromab pendetide single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT were performed within 6 weeks of each other. Studies were evaluated by two experienced interpreters for abnormal uptake suspicious for recurrent disease in the prostate bed and extraprostatic locations. The reference standard was a combination of tissue correlation, imaging, laboratory, and clinical data. Diagnostic performance measures were calculated and tests of the statistical significance of differences determined by using the McNemar chi(2) test as well as approximate tests based on the difference between two proportions. Results: For disease detection in the prostate bed, anti-3-F-18-FACBC had a sensitivity of 89% (32 of 36 patients; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 74%, 97%), specificity of 67% (eight of 12 patients; 95% CI: 35%, 90%), and accuracy of 83% (40 of 48 patients; 95% CI: 70%, 93%). In-111-capromab pendetide had a sensitivity of 69% (25 of 36 patients; 95% CI: 52%, 84%), specificity of 58% (seven of 12 patients; 95% CI: 28%, 85%), and accuracy of 67% (32 of 48 patients; 95% CI: 52%, 80%). In the detection of extraprostatic recurrence, anti-3-F-18-FACBC had a sensitivity of 100% (10 of 10 patients; 95% CI: 69%, 100%), specificity of 100% (seven of seven patients; 95% CI: 59%, 100%), and accuracy of 100% (17 of 17 patients; 95% CI: 80%, 100%). In-111-capromab pendetide had a sensitivity of 10% (one of 10 patients; 95% CI: 0%, 45%), specificity of 100% (seven of seven patients; 95% CI: 59%, 100%), and accuracy of 47% (eight of 17 patients; 95% CI: 23%, 72%). Conclusion: anti-3-F-18-FACBC PET/CT was more sensitive than In-111-capromab pendetide SPECT/CT in the detection of recurrent prostate carcinoma and is highly accurate in the differentiation of prostatic from extraprostatic disease. (C) RSNA, 2011
引用
收藏
页码:852 / 861
页数:10
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], EUR UROL
[2]  
[Anonymous], J UROL
[3]   Novel Tracers and Their Development for the Imaging of Metastatic Prostate Cancer [J].
Apolo, Andrea B. ;
Pandit-Taskar, Neeta ;
Morris, Michael J. .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2008, 49 (12) :2031-2041
[4]   Radionuclide and hybrid imaging of recurrent prostate cancer [J].
Beer, Ambros J. ;
Eiber, Matthias ;
Souvatzoglou, Michael ;
Schwaiger, Markus ;
Krause, Bernd Joachim .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2011, 12 (02) :181-191
[5]   A Systematic Review of the Role of Imaging before Salvage Radiotherapy for Post-prostatectomy Biochemical Recurrence [J].
Beresford, M. J. ;
Gillatt, D. ;
Benson, R. J. ;
Ajithkumar, T. .
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 22 (01) :46-55
[6]   PET/CT Imaging and Radioimmunotherapy of Prostate Cancer [J].
Bouchelouche, Kirsten ;
Tagawa, Scott T. ;
Goldsmith, Stanley J. ;
Turkbey, Bans ;
Capala, Jacek ;
Choyke, Peter .
SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2011, 41 (01) :29-44
[7]   Update on magnetic resonance imaging, ProstaScint, and novel imaging in prostate cancer [J].
Brassell, SA ;
Rosner, IL ;
McLeod, DG .
CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2005, 15 (03) :163-166
[8]   How to Improve the Ability to Detect Pelvic Lymph Node Metastases of Urologic Malignancies [J].
Briganti, Alberto .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 55 (04) :770-772
[9]   Salvage Radiotherapy for Patients with PSA Relapse Following Radical Prostatectomy: Issues and Challenges [J].
Choo, Richard .
CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2010, 42 (01) :1-11
[10]   Outcomes Following Negative Prostate Biopsy for Patients with Persistent Disease after Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer [J].
Cohen, Jacob H. ;
Eastham, James ;
Macchia, Richard J. .
INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2010, 36 (01) :44-48