Comparative ontogeny of the cyathium in Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae) and its allies:: exploring the organ-flower-inflorescence boundary

被引:73
作者
Prenner, Gerhard [1 ]
Rudall, Paula J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Bot Gardens, Jodrell Lab, Richmond TW9 3DS, Surrey, England
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
cyathium; Euphorbia; Euphorbiaceae; Euphorbieae; flower; Malpighiales; ontogeny; pseudanthium;
D O I
10.3732/ajb.94.10.1612
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
We present a detailed comparative ontogenetic analysis of pseudanthia of representatives of all three subtribes of Euphorbieae (Euphorbiinae, Neoguillauminiinae, Anthosteminae) in order to clarify their homologies and interpretation. The cyathium of Euphorbia and its allies (subtribe Euphorbiinae) closely resembles a bisexual flower but is traditionally interpreted as an inflorescence bearing clusters of highly reduced male flowers surrounding a single terminal female flower. Previously unreported characters are (1) male flowers formed one above the other in the male inflorescences of some Euphorbiinae, (2) late-developing perianthlike structures in some male flowers of Neoguillauminia cleopatra, (3) evidence for a bracteate origin of the female perianth in Anthosteminae and Neoguillauminiinae, and (4) spatiotemporally independent formation of abscission zone and perianth. Indistinct boundaries between inflorescence, flower, and floral organs demonstrate that defining the cyathium neither as an inflorescence nor as a flower is entirely satisfactory and indicate a "hybrid" flower/inflorescence nature of the cyathium. Based on our current knowledge and the existing phylogenetic context, it is most parsimonious to suggest that the cyathium evolved from a determinate thyrse with a terminal female flower surrounded by dichasial male partial inflorescences. We speculate that the cyathium was formed because of strong condensation and possible overlap between expression zones of regulatory genes.
引用
收藏
页码:1612 / 1629
页数:18
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]  
AGROVIENSIS JM, 1874, FLORA BRASILIENSIS E, V11, P293
[2]  
AGROVIENSIS JM, 1872, FLORA, V55, P65
[3]  
AMEKA GK, 2002, PLANT SYST EVOL, V237, P165
[4]  
AMEKA GK, 2003, BOT J LINN SOC, V139, P255
[5]  
*ANG PHYL GROUP, 1998, ANN MISSOURI BOT GAR, V18, P531
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2002, DEV GENETICS PLANT E
[7]  
BAILLON HE, 1858, ETUDE GEN GROUP EUPH
[8]  
Bentham G., 1878, J LINN SOC BOT, V17, P185, DOI [10.1111/j.1095-8339.1878.tb00657.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1095-8339.1878.TB00657.X]
[9]  
Bentham G., 1873, FLORA AUSTRALIENSIS, V6
[10]   Androecial development and systematics in Flacourtiaceae sl [J].
Bernhard, A ;
Endress, PK .
PLANT SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION, 1999, 215 (1-4) :141-155