A Systematic Literature Review on Performance Evaluation of Power System From the Perspective of Sustainability

被引:5
|
作者
Deng, Deqiang [1 ]
Li, Chao [2 ]
Zu, Yafei [2 ]
Liu, Lana Yan Jun [3 ]
Zhang, Jiayang [2 ]
Wen, Subin [4 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Forestry Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Newcastle Univ, Business Sch, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
[4] Nanjing Audit Univ, Sch Accounting, Nanjing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
sustainability; performance evaluation; power system; systematic review; evaluation framework; evaluation indicators; evaluation methods; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; RENEWABLE ENERGY-SOURCES; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; EFFICIENCY; SECTOR; CHINA; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.3389/fenvs.2022.925332
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sustainability is a comprehensive concept that integrates at least three dimensions of environment, economy and society. The power system is the primary source of greenhouse gas emissions, adversely impacting environmental sustainability. It also generates necessary energy supplies, which promote economic and social sustainable development. Based on the sustainability nature of power system, this study puts forward an improved methodology, namely "Planning-Searching-Screening-Reporting-Reflecting " (PSSRR Cycle) to review the literature systematically on power system performance evaluation from a sustainability perspective over the past 20 years, with the aim of describing the current state of the whole performance evaluation system including the evaluation framework, evaluation indicators and evaluation methods, and providing research suggestions for future research. This study finds in the current literature that the Triple Bottom Line theory is the most commonly used theoretical evaluation framework; environmental and economic sustainability indicators are more emphasized; the DEA and MCDM methods are the more common evaluation methods. This study presents some future research notes, including improving the Sustainable Balanced Scorecard as a sustainable performance evaluation framework, emphasizing more social sustainability indicators, and using a combination of existing evaluation methods to make performance evaluation more efficient and accurate.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sustainability in Construction Projects: A Systematic Literature Review
    Kiani Mavi, Reza
    Gengatharen, Denise
    Kiani Mavi, Neda
    Hughes, Richard
    Campbell, Alistair
    Yates, Ross
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (04) : 1 - 24
  • [22] Project sustainability strategies: A systematic literature review
    Aarseth, Wenche
    Ahola, Tuomas
    Aaltonen, Kirsi
    Okland, Andreas
    Andersen, Bjorn
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2017, 35 (06) : 1071 - 1083
  • [23] PLASTIC BAGS FROM A SUSTAINABILITY PERSPECTIVE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    de Freitas, Ingrid Zanuto
    dos Santos, Ana Paula
    Brandalise, Loreni Teresinha
    Flor Bertolini, Geysler Rogis
    REVISTA METROPOLITANA DE SUSTENTABILIDADE, 2020, 10 (03): : 182 - 203
  • [24] Sustainability in the dairy industry: a systematic literature review
    Feil, Alexandre Andre
    Schreiber, Dusan
    Haetinger, Claus
    Haberkamp, Angela Maria
    Kist, Joice Ines
    Rempel, Claudete
    Maehler, Alisson Eduardo
    Gomes, Mario Conill
    da Silva, Gustavo Rodrigo
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (27) : 33527 - 33542
  • [25] Green Construction and Local Wisdom Integration for Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review
    Kristinayanti, W. Sri
    Zaika, Yulvi
    Devia, Y. Padma
    Solimun
    Wibowo, M. Agung
    CIVIL ENGINEERING JOURNAL-TEHRAN, 2024, 10 (11): : 3779 - 3802
  • [26] Sustainability and financial performance of small and medium sized enterprises: A bibliometric and systematic literature review
    Bartolacci, Francesca
    Caputo, Andrea
    Soverchia, Michela
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 29 (03) : 1297 - 1309
  • [27] Energy project performance evaluation with sustainability perspective
    Buyukozkan, Gulcin
    Karabulut, Yagmur
    ENERGY, 2017, 119 : 549 - 560
  • [28] A leverage point perspective on serious games for sustainability transformation: a systematic literature review
    Foppe, Sabrina
    von Wehrden, Henrik
    SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2025, 20 (01) : 269 - 286
  • [29] A Systematic Review of the Literature on the Sustainability of Community Health Collaboratives
    Hearld, Larry R.
    Bleser, William K.
    Alexander, Jeffrey A.
    Wolf, Laura J.
    MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2016, 73 (02) : 127 - 181
  • [30] Sustainability Management and Performance in the Urban Corporate Economy: A Systematic Literature Review
    Lazaroiu, George
    Ionescu, Luminita
    Andronie, Mihai
    Dijmarescu, Irina
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (18)