A Systematic Literature Review on Performance Evaluation of Power System From the Perspective of Sustainability

被引:5
|
作者
Deng, Deqiang [1 ]
Li, Chao [2 ]
Zu, Yafei [2 ]
Liu, Lana Yan Jun [3 ]
Zhang, Jiayang [2 ]
Wen, Subin [4 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Forestry Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Newcastle Univ, Business Sch, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
[4] Nanjing Audit Univ, Sch Accounting, Nanjing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
sustainability; performance evaluation; power system; systematic review; evaluation framework; evaluation indicators; evaluation methods; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; RENEWABLE ENERGY-SOURCES; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; EFFICIENCY; SECTOR; CHINA; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.3389/fenvs.2022.925332
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sustainability is a comprehensive concept that integrates at least three dimensions of environment, economy and society. The power system is the primary source of greenhouse gas emissions, adversely impacting environmental sustainability. It also generates necessary energy supplies, which promote economic and social sustainable development. Based on the sustainability nature of power system, this study puts forward an improved methodology, namely "Planning-Searching-Screening-Reporting-Reflecting " (PSSRR Cycle) to review the literature systematically on power system performance evaluation from a sustainability perspective over the past 20 years, with the aim of describing the current state of the whole performance evaluation system including the evaluation framework, evaluation indicators and evaluation methods, and providing research suggestions for future research. This study finds in the current literature that the Triple Bottom Line theory is the most commonly used theoretical evaluation framework; environmental and economic sustainability indicators are more emphasized; the DEA and MCDM methods are the more common evaluation methods. This study presents some future research notes, including improving the Sustainable Balanced Scorecard as a sustainable performance evaluation framework, emphasizing more social sustainability indicators, and using a combination of existing evaluation methods to make performance evaluation more efficient and accurate.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sustainability performance evaluation: Literature review and future directions
    Buyukozkan, Gulcin
    Karabulut, Yagmur
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 217 : 253 - 267
  • [2] Financial performance evaluation of nuclear power-related enterprises from the perspective of sustainability
    Deng, Yaling
    Zou, Shuliang
    You, Daming
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (10) : 11349 - 11363
  • [3] Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems from a Sustainability Perspective: A Systematic Literature Review
    Orellano, Martha
    Sabioni, Rachel Campos
    Pacheco, Adriana
    ADVANCES IN PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: SMART MANUFACTURING AND LOGISTICS SYSTEMS: TURNING IDEAS INTO ACTION, APMS 2022, PT I, 2022, 663 : 152 - 159
  • [4] Port sustainability and performance: A systematic literature review
    Lim, Sehwa
    Pettit, Stephen
    Abouarghoub, Wessam
    Beresford, Anthony
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 72 : 47 - 64
  • [5] Motivation and Evaluation in Education from the Sustainability Perspective: A Review of the Scientific Literature
    Sanchez-Santamaria, Jose
    Boroel-Cervantes, Brenda Imelda
    Lopez-Garrido, Fatima-Maria
    Hortiguela-Alcala, David
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (07)
  • [6] Sustainability of power generation for developing economies: A systematic review of power sources mix
    Ibrahim, Hanif Auwal
    Ayomoh, Michael Kweneojo
    Bansal, Ramesh C.
    Gitau, Michael Njoroge
    Yadavalli, Venkatta S. S.
    Naidoo, Raj
    ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2023, 47
  • [7] Life cycle sustainability assessment: A systematic literature review through the application perspective, indicators, and methodologies
    Visentin, Caroline
    da Silva Trentin, Adan William
    Braun, Adeli Beatriz
    Thome, Ant Onio
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 270
  • [8] A systematic literature review of modular product design (MPD) from the perspective of sustainability
    Junfeng Ma
    Gül E. Okudan Kremer
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 86 : 1509 - 1539
  • [9] A systematic literature review of modular product design (MPD) from the perspective of sustainability
    Ma, Junfeng
    Kremer, Gul E. Okudan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 86 (5-8): : 1509 - 1539
  • [10] Financial performance evaluation of nuclear power-related enterprises from the perspective of sustainability
    Yaling Deng
    Shuliang Zou
    Daming You
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27 : 11349 - 11363