Keeping Up with the Times: How the Discipline of International Relations Responds to Benchmark Events

被引:3
作者
Ribar, Matthew K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Coll William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23187 USA
关键词
international relations theory; policy relevance; policy-academia gap; SOCIAL-SCIENCE; WORLD-POLITICS; AMERICAN; SECURITY; REALISM; GAP; END;
D O I
10.1093/isp/ekw005
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
This article examines how the discipline of international relations (IR) engages with the policy process by investigating the discipline's responsiveness to world events. To this end, the article deploys a mixed-methods approach using historical data of journal articles in twelve top IR journals covering 1980 to 2012 from the Teaching, Research, and International Policy (TRIP) Project as well as a series of interviews with scholars to show how four major world events, or benchmark events, influence the discipline of international relations. The paper finds that benchmark events do cause a shift in the subject areas in which IR scholars publish, as well as a shift in the popularity of theoretical approaches in which scholars ground their research. Benchmark events do not, however, cause a significant shift in where in the world IR scholars study. A series of elite interviews with IR professors is used to elaborate a causal mechanism for these correlations.
引用
收藏
页码:304 / 322
页数:19
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, N.Y. Times
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, EUR J INT RELAT
[3]   What Do Policymakers Want From Us? Results of a Survey of Current and Former Senior National Security Decision Makers [J].
Avey, Paul C. ;
Desch, Michael C. .
INTERNATIONAL STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2014, 58 (02) :227-246
[4]  
BALDWIN DA, 1995, WORLD POLIT, V48, P117, DOI 10.1353/wp.1995.0001
[5]   Rethinking benchmark dates in International Relations [J].
Buzan, Barry ;
Lawson, George .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2014, 20 (02) :437-462
[6]  
Carr EdwardHallett., 2001, 20 YEARSCRISIS 1919
[7]   Paradigm shifts and 9/11: International relations after the Twin Towers [J].
Cox, M .
SECURITY DIALOGUE, 2002, 33 (02) :247-251
[8]  
GADDIS JL, 1993, INT SECURITY, V17, P5
[9]  
Gates R. A., 2008, COMMUNICATION 0414
[10]  
HOFFMANN S, 1977, DAEDALUS, V106, P41