A National Contemporary Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes of Open versus Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy

被引:48
作者
Linder, Brian J. [1 ]
Occhino, John A. [2 ]
Habermann, Elizabeth B. [3 ]
Glasgow, Amy E. [3 ]
Bews, Katherine A. [3 ]
Gershman, Boris [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Urol, Rochester, MN USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Kern Ctr Sci Hlth Care Delivery, Surg Outcomes Program, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Brown Univ, Rhode Isl Hosp, Div Urol, Providence, RI 02903 USA
[5] Brown Univ, Miriam Hosp, Providence, RI USA
[6] Brown Univ, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Providence, RI USA
关键词
urinary bladder; pelvic organ prolapse; robotic surgical procedures; postoperative complications; minimally invasive surgical procedures; LAPAROSCOPIC SACROCOLPOPEXY; ABDOMINAL SACROCOLPOPEXY; ROBOTIC SACROCOLPOPEXY; PROLAPSE;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2018.03.131
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We evaluated the perioperative morbidity of open abdominal sacrocolpopexy and minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy using data on a contemporary nationwide cohort. Materials and Methods: We used the ACS (American College of Surgeons) NSQIP (R) (National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) database to identify women who underwent abdominal or minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy from 2010 to 2016. Associations of surgical approach with 30-day complications, blood transfusion, prolonged hospitalization and reoperation were evaluated by logistic regression. Hospital readmission within 30 days was calculated by the person-years method and Cox proportional hazard models. Results: A total of 4,362 women underwent sacrocolpopexy, including abdominal sacrocolpopexy in 1,179 (27%) and minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy in 3,183 (73%). The proportion of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy increased during the study period from 70% in 2010 to 82% in 2016. Baseline characteristics were similar between the treatment groups aside from a higher rate of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p = 0.03) and higher preoperative albumin (p < 0.0001) among abdominal sacrocolpopexy cases. Compared to abdominal sacrocolpopexy, minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy was associated with lower rates of 30-day complications (p = 0.001), deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (p = 0.02), surgical site infections (p < 0.0001), shorter hospitalization (p < 0.0001) and fewer blood transfusions (p = 0.01). Minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy was also associated with a lower 30 person-days readmission rate (2% vs 2.7%, p <= 0.0001) and 30-day reoperation rate (1.1% vs 1.4%, p < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy was independently associated with a reduced risk of 30-day complications (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.28, 0.76, p = 0.002), blood transfusion (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.15, 0.74, p = 0.007), prolonged hospitalization (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.12, 0.23, p < 0.001) and readmission (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41, 0.96, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy was associated with reduced rates of 30-day complications, blood transfusion, prolonged hospitalization and hospital readmission compared to abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
引用
收藏
页码:862 / 867
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and learning curve
    Akl, Mohamed N.
    Long, Jaime B.
    Giles, Dobie L.
    Cornella, Jeffrey L.
    Pettit, Paul D.
    Chen, Anita H.
    Magtibay, Paul M.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 23 (10): : 2390 - 2394
  • [2] Perioperative complications of robotic sacrocolpopexy for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse
    Anand, Mallika
    Woelk, Joshua L.
    Weaver, Amy L.
    Trabuco, Emanuel C.
    Klingele, Christopher J.
    Gebhart, John B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2014, 25 (09) : 1193 - 1200
  • [3] Robotic Compared With Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Anger, Jennifer T.
    Mueller, Elizabeth R.
    Tarnay, Christopher
    Smith, Bridget
    Stroupe, Kevin
    Rosenman, Amy
    Brubaker, Linda
    Bresee, Catherine
    Kenton, Kimberly
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 123 (01) : 5 - 12
  • [4] Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy compared with open abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse repair: a randomised controlled trial
    Coolen, Anne-Lotte W. M.
    van Oudheusden, Anique M. J.
    Mol, Ben Willem J.
    van Eijndhoven, Hugo W. F.
    Roovers, Jan-Paul W. R.
    Bongers, Marlies Y.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 28 (10) : 1469 - 1479
  • [5] Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Costantini, Elisabetta
    Mearini, Luigi
    Lazzeri, Massimo
    Bini, Vittorio
    Nunzi, Elisabetta
    di Biase, Manuel
    Porena, Massimo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 196 (01) : 159 - 165
  • [6] Robotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    De Sa, Maribel De Gouveia
    Claydon, Leica Sarah
    Whitlow, Barry
    Dolcet Artahona, Maria Angelica
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 27 (03) : 355 - 366
  • [7] Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse
    Elliott, Daniel S.
    Krambeck, Amy E.
    Chow, George K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (02) : 655 - 659
  • [8] Changes in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery in the Last Decade among United States Urologists
    Elterman, Dean S.
    Chughtai, Bilal I.
    Vertosick, Emily
    Maschino, Alexandra
    Eastham, James A.
    Sandhu, Jaspreet S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (04) : 1022 - 1027
  • [9] The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in non-veterans administration hospitals - Initial demonstration of feasibility
    Fink, AS
    Campbell, DA
    Mentzer, RM
    Henderson, WG
    Daley, J
    Bannister, J
    Hur, K
    Khuri, SF
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2002, 236 (03) : 344 - 354
  • [10] Robotic Vs Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: 44-Month Pelvic Floor Outcomes
    Geller, Elizabeth J.
    Parnell, Brent A.
    Dunivan, Gena C.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2012, 79 (03) : 532 - 536