Patient selection for corneal topographic evaluation of keratoconus: A screening approach using artificial intelligence

被引:7
作者
Ahn, Hyunmin [1 ]
Kim, Na Eun [1 ]
Chung, Jae Lim [2 ]
Kim, Young Jun [2 ]
Jun, Ikhyun [1 ]
Kim, Tae-im [1 ]
Seo, Kyoung Yul [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Inst Vis Res, Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Eyejun Ophthalm Clin, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
artificial intelligence; corneal topography; keratoconus; machine learning; Pentacam; screening test;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2022.934865
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundCorneal topography is a clinically validated examination method for keratoconus. However, there is no clear guideline regarding patient selection for corneal topography. We developed and validated a novel artificial intelligence (AI) model to identify patients who would benefit from corneal topography based on basic ophthalmologic examinations, including a survey of visual impairment, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurement, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, and autokeratometry. MethodsA total of five AI models (three individual models with fully connected neural network including the XGBoost, and the TabNet models, and two ensemble models with hard and soft voting methods) were trained and validated. We used three datasets collected from the records of 2,613 patients' basic ophthalmologic examinations from two institutions to train and validate the AI models. We trained the AI models using a dataset from a third medical institution to determine whether corneal topography was needed to detect keratoconus. Finally, prospective intra-validation dataset (internal test dataset) and extra-validation dataset from a different medical institution (external test dataset) were used to assess the performance of the AI models. ResultsThe ensemble model with soft voting method outperformed all other AI models in sensitivity when predicting which patients needed corneal topography (90.5% in internal test dataset and 96.4% in external test dataset). In the error analysis, most of the predicting error occurred within the range of the subclinical keratoconus and the suspicious D-score in the Belin-Ambrosio enhanced ectasia display. In the feature importance analysis, out of 18 features, IOP was the highest ranked feature when comparing the average value of the relative attributions of three individual AI models, followed by the difference in the value of mean corneal power. ConclusionAn AI model using the results of basic ophthalmologic examination has the potential to recommend corneal topography for keratoconus. In this AI algorithm, IOP and the difference between the two eyes, which may be undervalued clinical information, were important factors in the success of the AI model, and may be worth further reviewing in research and clinical practice for keratoconus screening.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Arik SO, 2021, AAAI CONF ARTIF INTE, V35, P6679
[2]  
Belin M.W., 2007, Highlights Ophthalmol, V35, P5
[3]   Tomographic Parameters for the Detection of Keratoconus: Suggestions for Screening and Treatment Parameters [J].
Belin, Michael W. ;
Villavicencio, Ovette F. ;
Ambrosio, Renato R., Jr. .
EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2014, 40 (06) :326-330
[4]   OCULAR RIGIDITY AND INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE IN KERATOCONUS [J].
BROOKS, AMV ;
ROBERTSON, IF ;
MAHONEY, AM .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1984, 12 (04) :317-324
[5]   POINTS OF SIGNIFICANCE Statistics versus machine learning [J].
Bzdok, Danilo ;
Altman, Naomi ;
Krzywinski, Martin .
NATURE METHODS, 2018, 15 (04) :232-233
[6]   Prevalence of Keratoconus Based on Scheimpflug Imaging The Raine Study [J].
Chan, Elsie ;
Chong, Elaine W. ;
Lingham, Gareth ;
Stevenson, Louis J. ;
Sanfilippo, Paul G. ;
Hewitt, Alex W. ;
Mackey, David A. ;
Yazar, Seyhan .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 128 (04) :515-521
[7]   Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group [J].
Chen, Min ;
Zhang, Lina ;
Xu, Jia ;
Chen, Xinyi ;
Gu, Yuxiang ;
Ren, Yuping ;
Wang, Kaijun .
BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 19 (01)
[8]   XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System [J].
Chen, Tianqi ;
Guestrin, Carlos .
KDD'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2016, :785-794
[9]   The influence of cornea properties on rebound tonometry [J].
Chui, Wan-sang ;
Lam, Andrew ;
Chen, Davie ;
Chiu, Roger .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 115 (01) :80-84
[10]   Applications of corneal topography and tomography: a review [J].
Fan, Rachel ;
Chan, Tommy C. Y. ;
Prakash, Gaurav ;
Jhanji, Vishal .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 46 (02) :133-146