Status anxiety mediates the positive relationship between income inequality and sexualization

被引:35
作者
Blake, Khandis R. [1 ,2 ]
Brooks, Robert C. [1 ]
机构
[1] UNSW Sydney, Evolut & Ecol Res Ctr, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Psychol Sci, Melbourne, Vic 3011, Australia
关键词
economic inequality; sexualization; status anxiety; self-objectification; MEN;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.1909806116
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Income inequality generates and amplifies incentives, particularly incentives for individuals to elevate or maintain their status, with important consequences for the individuals involved and aggregate outcomes for their societies [R. G. Wilkinson, K. E. Pickett, Annu. Rev. Sociol. 35, 493-511 (2009)]. Economically unequal environments intensify men's competition for status, respect, and, ultimately, mating opportunities, thus elevating aggregate rates of violent crime and homicide [M. Daly, M. Wilson, Evolutionary Psychology and Motivation (2001)]. Recent evidence shows that women are more likely to post "sexy selfies" on social media and that they spend more on beautification in places where inequality is high rather than low [K. R. Blake, B. Bastian, T. F. Denson, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 8722-8727 (2018)]. Here we test experimentally for causal links between income inequality and individual selfsexualization and status-related competition. We show that manipulating income inequality in a role-playing task indirectly increases women's intentions to wear revealing clothing and that it does so by increasing women's anxiety about their place in the social hierarchy. The effects are not better accounted for by wealth/poverty than by inequality or by modeling anxiety about same-sex competitors in place of status anxiety. The results indicate that women's appearance enhancement is partly driven by status-related goals.
引用
收藏
页码:25029 / 25033
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
[21]  
Kline RB, 2011, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE
[22]   Empowering or Oppressing? Development and Exploration of the Enjoyment of Sexualization Scale [J].
Liss, Miriam ;
Erchull, Mindy J. ;
Ramsey, Laura R. .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2011, 37 (01) :55-68
[23]   Explaining financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive people: Interdisciplinary perspectives from economics, social psychology, and evolutionary psychology [J].
Maestripieri, Dario ;
Henry, Andrea ;
Nickels, Nora .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2017, 40 :1-+
[24]  
Paskov M., 2013, Income inequality and status anxiety
[25]   Sexualizing the Self: What College Women and Men Think About and Do to Be "Sexy'' [J].
Smolak, Linda ;
Murnen, Sarah K. ;
Myers, Taryn A. .
PSYCHOLOGY OF WOMEN QUARTERLY, 2014, 38 (03) :379-397
[26]   BENEFITS OF BEING ATTRACTIVE - DIFFERENTIAL PAYOFFS FOR MEN AND WOMEN [J].
UDRY, JR ;
ECKLAND, BK .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1984, 54 (01) :47-56
[27]   Men's status and reproductive success in 33 nonindustrial societies: Effects of subsistence, marriage system, and reproductive strategy [J].
von Rueden, Christopher R. ;
Jaeggi, Adrian V. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2016, 113 (39) :10824-10829
[28]   Positional Goods and the Social Rank Hypothesis: Income Inequality Affects Online Chatter about High- and Low-Status Brands on Twitter [J].
Walasek, Lukasz ;
Bhatia, Sudeep ;
Brown, Gordon D. A. .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 28 (01) :138-148
[29]   Frequent social comparisons and destructive emotions and behaviors: The dark side of social comparisons [J].
White, Judith B. ;
Langer, Ellen J. ;
Yariv, Leeat ;
Welch, John C. .
JOURNAL OF ADULT DEVELOPMENT, 2006, 13 (01) :36-44
[30]   Income Inequality and Social Dysfunction [J].
Wilkinson, Richard G. ;
Pickett, Kate E. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 2009, 35 :493-511