Why can't more people have a say? Learning to work with older people

被引:10
作者
Gilroy, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle Upon Tyne, Sch Architecture Planning & Landscape, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
housing; older people; empowerment; organisational cultures; institutional learning; Better Government for Older People;
D O I
10.1017/S0144686X03001351
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学]; R592 [老年病学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100203 ; 100602 ;
摘要
As part of a suite of policy documents on older people's issues, the 'New Labour' British government has published a joint housing and health strategy, Quality and Choice for Older People's Housing. In this they attempt to map out the problems facing older people. The strategy also suggests that among the solutions there should be more opportunities for older people to make choices and for their deeper involvement in housing matters. This paper sketches the background to this strategy and reviews the literature to determine whether there is a foundation of dialogue with older people on housing issues. While there have been increasing efforts to build socially inclusive processes, particularly in the major 'regeneration' programmes, it is still the case that older people are usually excluded. The core of the paper is a case study from the Better Government for Older People programme which explored the process by which older people worked alongside professionals to remodel a local authority dwelling. An analysis of the dialogue provides a window onto the self conceptions of professionals. Older people gained as individuals and as a group from the housing project, and were able to develop collective influence through a representation role. Learning by the local authority was more incremental. The paper ends with a discussion of the broader lessons for service providers.
引用
收藏
页码:659 / 674
页数:16
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, The Eclipse of Council Housing
[2]  
[Anonymous], HOUSING STUDIES
[3]  
ARNSTEIN S, 1969, J AM I PLANNERS, V35, P214
[4]   Discourses of partnership and empowerment in contemporary British urban regeneration [J].
Atkinson, R .
URBAN STUDIES, 1999, 36 (01) :59-72
[5]  
*AUD COMM, 2002, DERW DISTR COUNC SUP
[6]  
Booth Chris, 2001, TOWN PLAN REV, V72, P217
[7]  
Brenton M., 1999, CHOICE AUTONOMY MUTU
[8]  
BROWNILL S, 1998, RICH MIX INCLUSIVE S
[9]  
CAIRNCROSS L, 1990, TENANT PARTICIPATION
[10]  
CAVANAGH S, 1996, HOUSING QUESTIONS OT, P67