Treatment Decision Making for Older Kidney Patients during COVID-19

被引:12
|
作者
Porteny, Thalia [1 ,2 ,13 ]
Gonzales, Kristina M. [1 ,2 ]
Aufort, Kate E. [1 ,2 ]
Levine, Sarah [3 ]
Wong, John B. [4 ]
Isakova, Tamara [5 ]
Rifkin, Dena E. [6 ,7 ]
Gordon, Elisa J. [8 ,9 ]
Rossi, Ana [10 ]
Di Perna, Gary [11 ]
Koch-Weser, Susan [12 ]
Weiner, Daniel E. [3 ]
Ladin, Keren [1 ,2 ]
Stakeholder Advisory Board [2 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Dept Occupat Therapy, Lab Res Ethics, Aging & Community Hlth, Medford, MA USA
[2] Tufts Univ, Dept Community Hlth, Medford, MA USA
[3] Tufts Med Ctr, William B Schwartz MD Div Nephrol, Boston, MA USA
[4] Tufts Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Clin Med, Boston, MA USA
[5] Northwestern Univ, Inst Publ Hlth & Med, Ctr Translat Metab & Hlth, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[6] Vet Affairs Healthcare Syst, Div Nephrol, San Diego, CA USA
[7] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Med, Div Nephrol & Hypertens, San Diego, CA USA
[8] Northwestern Univ, Dept Surg, Div Transplantat, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[9] Northwestern Univ, Inst Publ Hlth & Med, Ctr Hlth Serv & Outcomes Res, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[10] Piedmont Transplant Inst, Atlanta, Georgia
[11] Maine Nephrol Assoc, Maine, NY USA
[12] Tufts Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Community Med, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[13] Tufts Univ, Dept Occupat Therapy & Community Hlth, 574 Boston Ave,Suite 216, Medford, MA 02155 USA
来源
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY | 2022年 / 17卷 / 07期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
COVID-19; qualitative research; decision making; SARS-CoV-2; chronic kidney disease; DIALYSIS INITIATION; CARE; OUTCOMES; DISEASE; CKD;
D O I
10.2215/CJN.13241021
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and objectives Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disrupted medical care across health care settings for older patients with advanced CKD. Understanding how shared decision making for kidney treatment decisions was influenced by the uncertainty of an evolving pandemic can provide insights for supporting shared decision making through the current and future public health crises. Design, setting, participants, & measurements We performed thematic and narrative analyses of semistructured interviews with patients (CKD stages 4 and 5, age 701), care partners, and clinicians from Boston, Portland (Maine), San Diego, and Chicago from August to December 2020. Results We interviewed 76 participants (39 patients, 17 care partners, and 20 clinicians). Among patient participants, 13 (33%) patients identified as Black, and seven (18%) had initiated dialysis. Four themes with corresponding subthemes emerged related to treatment decision making and the COVID-19 pandemic: (1) adapting to changed educational and patient engagement practices (patient barriers to care and new opportunities for telemedicine); (2) reconceptualizing vulnerability (clinician awareness of illness severity increased and limited discussions of patient COVID-19 vulnerability); (3) embracing home-based dialysis but not conservative management (openness to home-based modalities and limited discussion of conservative management and advanced care planning); and (4) satisfaction and safety with treatment decisions despite conditions of uncertainty. Conclusions Although clinicians perceived greater vulnerability among older patients CKD and more readily encouraged home-based modalities during the COVID-19 pandemic, their discussions of vulnerability, advance care planning, and conservative management remained limited, suggesting areas for improvement. Clinicians reported burnout caused by the pandemic, increased time demands, and workforce limitations, whereas patients remained satisfied with their treatment choices despite uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页码:957 / 965
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Local Decision Making and Aging Policies During Covid-19
    Lopez-Lago Ortiz, Luis
    Munoz Gonzalez, Beatriz
    Serrano Alfonso, M. Angeles
    GERONTECHNOLOGY IV, 2022, : 331 - 340
  • [2] Wellbeing: Decision making and behavior during COVID-19
    Kliger, Doron
    Levy, Meira
    Rachevski, Israel
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2024, 109
  • [3] Shared Decision Making during the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Kother, Anja K.
    Siebenhaar, Katharina U.
    Alpers, Georg W.
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2021, 41 (04) : 430 - 438
  • [5] Decision making by health professionals during COVID-19: an integrative review
    Valente, Camila Oliveira
    da Silva, Fernanda Rios
    Mussi, Fernanda Carneiro
    Lacerda, Maria Ribeiro
    Freitas, Katia Santana
    Santa Rosa, Darci de Oliveira
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2022, 75
  • [6] Decision Making on Telemedicine for Patients With Epilepsy During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Crisis
    Kuroda, Naoto
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [7] The Challenges and Opportunities for Shared Decision Making Highlighted by COVID-19
    Abrams, Elissa M.
    Shaker, Marcus
    Oppenheimer, John
    Davis, Ray S.
    Bukstein, Don A.
    Greenhawt, Matthew
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2020, 8 (08) : 2474 - +
  • [8] Fuzzy Decision Tree Based Method in Decision-Making of COVID-19 Patients' Treatment
    Rabcan, Jan
    Zaitseva, Elena
    Levashenko, Vitaly
    Kvassay, Miroslav
    Surda, Pavol
    Macekova, Denisa
    MATHEMATICS, 2021, 9 (24)
  • [9] Cancer Patients' Challenges During COVID-19 Pandemic: An Approach to Decision-Making in Management and Policy-Making
    Savabi-Esfahani, Mitra
    Zangeneh, Sanaz
    Sharbafchi, Mohammad Reza
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 16 (05):
  • [10] Academic libraries' leaders' decision-making during the COVID-19 crisis
    Lembinen, Liisi
    JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP, 2023, 49 (03)