Alcohol screening and brief intervention in primary care: Absence of evidence for efficacy in people with dependence or very heavy drinking

被引:174
作者
Saitz, Richard [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Boston Med Ctr, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[3] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA USA
关键词
alcohol; alcohol dependence; primary care; brief intervention; systematic review; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; BRIEF PHYSICIAN ADVICE; GENERAL-PRACTICE; PROBLEM DRINKERS; MEDICAL INPATIENTS; MOTIVATIONAL INTERVENTION; HEALTH; RISK; CONSUMPTION; NURSE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1465-3362.2010.00217.x
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Issues. Although screening and brief intervention (BI) in the primary-care setting reduces unhealthy alcohol use, its efficacy among patients with dependence has not been established. This systematic review sought to determine whether evidence exists for BI efficacy among patients with alcohol dependence identified by screening in primary-care settings. Approach. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) extracted from eight systematic reviews and electronic database searches published through September 2009. These RCTs compared outcomes among adults with unhealthy alcohol use identified by screening who received BI in a primary-care setting with those who received no intervention. Key Findings. Sixteen RCTs, including 6839 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 14 excluded some or all persons with very heavy alcohol use or dependence; one in which 35% of 175 patients had dependence found no difference in an alcohol severity score between groups; and one in which 58% of 24 female patients had dependence showed no efficacy. Conclusion and Implications. Alcohol screening and BI has efficacy in primary care for patients with unhealthy alcohol use, but there is no evidence for efficacy among those with very heavy use or dependence. As alcohol screening identifies both dependent and non-dependent unhealthy use, the absence of evidence for the efficacy of BI among primary-care patients with screening-identified alcohol dependence raises questions regarding the efficiency of screening and BI, particularly in settings where dependence is common. The finding also highlights the need to develop new approaches to help such patients, particularly if screening and BI are to be disseminated widely. [Saitz R. Alcohol screening and brief intervention in primary care: Absence of evidence for efficacy in people with dependence or very heavy drinking. Drug Alcohol Rev 2010;29;631-640].
引用
收藏
页码:631 / 640
页数:10
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
Aalto M, 2000, ALCOHOL CLIN EXP RES, V24, P1680, DOI 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2000.tb01969.x
[2]   Brief intervention for male heavy drinkers tn routine general practice:: A three-year randomized controlled study [J].
Aalto, M ;
Seppä, K ;
Mittila, P ;
Mustonen, H ;
Ruuth, K ;
Hyvärinen, H ;
Pulkkinen, H ;
Alho, H ;
Sillanaukee, P .
ALCOHOL AND ALCOHOLISM, 2001, 36 (03) :224-230
[3]  
Altisent R, 1997, MED CLIN-BARCELONA, V109, P121
[4]  
ANDERSON P, 1992, BRIT J ADDICT, V87, P891
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Am J Public Health, V86, P948
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2009, COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[7]  
[Anonymous], ADICCIONES
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2002, REV PRATICIEN MED GE
[9]   Efficacy of brief interventions for hazardous drinkers in primary care:: Systematic review and meta-analyses [J].
Ballesteros, J ;
Duffy, JC ;
Querejeta, I ;
Ariño, J ;
González-Pinto, A .
ALCOHOL-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2004, 28 (04) :608-618
[10]   Screening in brief intervention trials targeting excessive drinkers in general practice: systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Beich, A ;
Thorsen, T ;
Rollnick, S .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7414) :536-540A