Effect of EDTA decalcification on estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor immunohistochemistry and HER2/neu fluorescence in situ hybridization in breast carcinoma

被引:7
|
作者
Washburn, Erik [1 ]
Tang, Xiaoyu [1 ,2 ]
Caruso, Carla [1 ,3 ]
Walls, Michelle [1 ]
Han, Bing [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Hlth Hershey Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
[2] Geisinger Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, 100 N Acad Ave, Danville, PA 17822 USA
[3] Univ Missouri, Dept Pathol, 1 Hosp Dr,Off N305c, Columbia, MO 65212 USA
关键词
Immunohistochemistry; Decalcification agents; EDTA; In situ hybridization; Bone biopsies; Metastatic cancer; CANCER AMERICAN SOCIETY; ENDOCRINE THERAPY; EXPRESSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.humpath.2021.08.007
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Bone is the most common site of metastasis in breast carcinoma (BC). Treatments for metastatic BC depend on various factors, including the tumor's estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 status. Bone biopsies require decalcification which may affect the accuracy of ER and PR immunohistochemistry (IHC) and HER2 situ hybridization (FISH) studies. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) decalcifying solutions have been theorized to have no significant impact on ER and PR IHC or HER2 FISH analyses. We completed a prospective study of the effect of EDTA decalcification on ER and PR IHC and HER2 FISH in 29 cases of BC. Samples from 29 BC resections were collected and formalin fixed between 12 and 24 h. Control samples were routinely processed, whereas test samples were placed in EDTA for 48 h. ER and PR slides were blinded, randomized, and evaluated. Blinded samples underwent HER2 FISH assays where an average HER2 copy number and HER2/CEP17 ratio were calculated. Paired differences between EDTA and control samples were compared for ER and PR positivity, average HER2 copy number, and HER2/CEP17 ratios using paired-samples t-tests (PST) and Wilcoxon signed-rank test (WSR). PST and WSR tests yielded no significant difference between EDTA and control tissue for ER% (PST: Inc1; WSR: P=0.916), PR% (PST: P=0.973; WSR: P=0.984), HER2 copy number (PST: P=0.124; WSR: P=0.103), and HER2/CEP17 ratio (PST: P=0.25; WSR: P=0.105). The use of EDTA in bony tissue is therefore a valid decalcification method to ensure accurate assessment of ER and PR IHC and HER2 FISH in metastatic BC. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 114
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] HER-2/neu testing in breast carcinoma:: A combined immunohistochemical and fluorescence In situ hybridization approach
    Ridolfi, RL
    Jamehdor, MR
    Arber, JM
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2000, 13 (08) : 866 - 873
  • [32] HER2 Status in Gastric Adenocarcinomas Assessed by Immunohistochemistry, Automated Silver-Enhanced In Situ Hybridization and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization
    Kim, Aeri
    Bae, Jung Min
    Kim, Se Won
    Gu, Mi Jin
    Bae, Young Kyung
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2010, 44 (05) : 493 - 501
  • [33] Assessment of HER-2/Neu status by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization in mammary Paget disease and underlying carcinoma
    Anderson, JM
    Ariga, R
    Govil, H
    Bloom, KJ
    Francescatti, D
    Reddy, VB
    Gould, VE
    Gattuso, P
    APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2003, 11 (02) : 120 - 124
  • [34] Prognostic significance of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2/neu, Ki-67, and nm23 expression in patients with invasive breast cancer
    Cubukcu, E.
    Kanat, O.
    Olmez, O. Fatih
    Kabul, S.
    Canhoroz, M.
    Avci, N.
    Deligonul, A.
    Hartavi, M.
    Cubukcu, S.
    Olmez, F.
    Kurt, E.
    Evrensel, T.
    Gokgoz, S.
    Manavoglu, O.
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2013, 18 (02): : 359 - 365
  • [35] HER-2/Neu evaluation by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization in breast cancer:: Implications for daily laboratory practice
    Larsimont, D
    Di Leo, A
    Rouas, G
    Paesmans, M
    Ferreira, F
    Bernard, C
    Cardoso, F
    Verhest, A
    Piccart, MJ
    Gancberg, D
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2002, 22 (04) : 2485 - 2490
  • [36] Quantitative evaluation of HER-2/neu status in breast cancer by fluorescence in situ hybridization and by immunohistochemistry with image analysis
    Lehr, HA
    Jacobs, TW
    Yaziji, H
    Schnitt, SJ
    Gown, AM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2001, 115 (06) : 814 - 822
  • [37] The Comparison of Automated Silver in situ Hybridization and Fluorescence in situ Hybridization for Evaluating HER2 Gene Amplification in Breast Carcinoma
    Kim, Tae-Jung
    Kim, Tae Eun
    Jung, Eun Sun
    Yim, Hyeon Woo
    Song, Byung Joo
    Jung, Sang Seol
    Lee, Ahwon
    Choi, Yeong-Jin
    Lee, Kyo-Young
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2009, 12 (04) : 295 - 301
  • [38] Her2/neu Status Determination in Breast Cancer A Single Institutional Experience Using a Dual-Testing Approach With Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization
    Solomon, James P.
    Dell'Aquila, Marie
    Fadare, Oluwole
    Hasteh, Farnaz
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2017, 147 (04) : 432 - 437
  • [39] Estrogen and progesterone hormone receptor status in breast carcinoma: Comparison of immunocytochemistry and immunohistochemistry
    Radhika, K.
    Prayaga, A. K.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 47 (02) : 148 - 150
  • [40] STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF 100 BREAST CANCER CASES WITH EVALUATION OF HER2/NEU STATUS IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY CORRELATION WITH GENE AMPLIFICATION BY FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION ASSAY
    Sivakami
    Kannan, Indhu
    Madhusudhanan
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2018, 7 (49): : 5298 - 5303