Effect of EDTA decalcification on estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor immunohistochemistry and HER2/neu fluorescence in situ hybridization in breast carcinoma

被引:7
|
作者
Washburn, Erik [1 ]
Tang, Xiaoyu [1 ,2 ]
Caruso, Carla [1 ,3 ]
Walls, Michelle [1 ]
Han, Bing [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Hlth Hershey Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
[2] Geisinger Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, 100 N Acad Ave, Danville, PA 17822 USA
[3] Univ Missouri, Dept Pathol, 1 Hosp Dr,Off N305c, Columbia, MO 65212 USA
关键词
Immunohistochemistry; Decalcification agents; EDTA; In situ hybridization; Bone biopsies; Metastatic cancer; CANCER AMERICAN SOCIETY; ENDOCRINE THERAPY; EXPRESSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.humpath.2021.08.007
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Bone is the most common site of metastasis in breast carcinoma (BC). Treatments for metastatic BC depend on various factors, including the tumor's estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 status. Bone biopsies require decalcification which may affect the accuracy of ER and PR immunohistochemistry (IHC) and HER2 situ hybridization (FISH) studies. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) decalcifying solutions have been theorized to have no significant impact on ER and PR IHC or HER2 FISH analyses. We completed a prospective study of the effect of EDTA decalcification on ER and PR IHC and HER2 FISH in 29 cases of BC. Samples from 29 BC resections were collected and formalin fixed between 12 and 24 h. Control samples were routinely processed, whereas test samples were placed in EDTA for 48 h. ER and PR slides were blinded, randomized, and evaluated. Blinded samples underwent HER2 FISH assays where an average HER2 copy number and HER2/CEP17 ratio were calculated. Paired differences between EDTA and control samples were compared for ER and PR positivity, average HER2 copy number, and HER2/CEP17 ratios using paired-samples t-tests (PST) and Wilcoxon signed-rank test (WSR). PST and WSR tests yielded no significant difference between EDTA and control tissue for ER% (PST: Inc1; WSR: P=0.916), PR% (PST: P=0.973; WSR: P=0.984), HER2 copy number (PST: P=0.124; WSR: P=0.103), and HER2/CEP17 ratio (PST: P=0.25; WSR: P=0.105). The use of EDTA in bony tissue is therefore a valid decalcification method to ensure accurate assessment of ER and PR IHC and HER2 FISH in metastatic BC. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 114
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, HER2/neu, P53 and Ki-67 status of Male Breast Carcinomas in Pakistan
    Jamal, Shahid
    Mushtaq, Huma
    Mubarik, Azhar
    Malik, Tariq Masood
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2009, 10 (06) : 1067 - 1070
  • [22] Microarray-Based Determination of Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and HER2 Receptor Status in Breast Cancer
    Roepman, Paul
    Horlings, Hugo M.
    Krijgsman, Oscar
    Kok, Marleen
    Bueno-de-Mesquita, Jolien M.
    Bender, Richard
    Linn, Sabine C.
    Glas, Annuska M.
    van de Vijver, Marc J.
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2009, 15 (22) : 7003 - 7011
  • [23] Monoplex LightCycler Polymerase Chain Reaction Quantitation of the HER2 Gene for Quality Assurance of HER2/neu Testing by Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization
    Layfield, Lester J.
    Willmore-Payne, Carlynn
    Isom, Gary
    Holden, Joseph A.
    APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2008, 16 (06) : 562 - 567
  • [24] Immunochemistry for oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2 on cell blocks in primary breast carcinoma
    Kumar, K. S.
    Gupta, N.
    Rajwanshi, A.
    Joshi, K.
    Singh, G.
    CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2012, 23 (03) : 181 - 186
  • [25] Correlation between HER2 gene amplification and protein overexpression through fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry in breast carcinoma patients
    Makroo, R. N.
    Chowdhry, Mohit
    Kumar, Manoj
    Srivastava, Priyanka
    Tyagi, Richa
    Bhadauria, Preeti
    Kaul, Sumaid
    Sarin, Ramesh
    Das, P. K.
    Dua, Harsh
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY AND MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 55 (04) : 481 - 484
  • [26] Negative estrogen-receptor invasive breast carcinoma: mammographic aspects, correlations with HER2/neu oncoprotein status
    Enache, Dana Elena
    Georgescu, Claudia Valentina
    Patrana, Nicoleta
    ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY AND EMBRYOLOGY, 2012, 53 (03) : 755 - 762
  • [27] Chromogenic in situ hybridization for Her-2/neu-oncogene in breast cancer: comparison of a new dual-colour chromogenic in situ hybridization with immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Mayr, Doris
    Heim, Sibylle
    Weyrauch, Kerstin
    Zeindl-Eberhart, Evelyn
    Kunz, Anne
    Engel, Jutta
    Kirchner, Thomas
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2009, 55 (06) : 716 - 723
  • [28] Determination of Her-2/neu status in breast carcinoma:: Comparative analysis of immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in situ hybridization
    Jimenez, RE
    Wallis, T
    Tabasczka, P
    Visscher, DW
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2000, 13 (01) : 37 - 45
  • [29] In situ analysis of HER2 mRNA in gastric carcinoma: comparison with fluorescence in situ hybridization, dual-color silver in situ hybridization, and immunohistochemistry
    Kim, Min A.
    Jung, Jung Eun
    Lee, Hee Eun
    Yang, Han-Kwang
    Kim, Woo Ho
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2013, 44 (04) : 487 - 494
  • [30] Determination of HER-2/neu by Chromogenic in Situ Hybridization on Borderline (2+) Immunohistochemistry Cases in Carcinoma Breast
    Asif, Muhammad
    Khadim, Muhammad Tahir
    Mushtaq, Sajid
    Mamoon, Nadira
    Akhtar, Farhan
    Ali, Zafar
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2011, 12 (01) : 211 - 214