Effect of EDTA decalcification on estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor immunohistochemistry and HER2/neu fluorescence in situ hybridization in breast carcinoma

被引:7
|
作者
Washburn, Erik [1 ]
Tang, Xiaoyu [1 ,2 ]
Caruso, Carla [1 ,3 ]
Walls, Michelle [1 ]
Han, Bing [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Hlth Hershey Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
[2] Geisinger Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, 100 N Acad Ave, Danville, PA 17822 USA
[3] Univ Missouri, Dept Pathol, 1 Hosp Dr,Off N305c, Columbia, MO 65212 USA
关键词
Immunohistochemistry; Decalcification agents; EDTA; In situ hybridization; Bone biopsies; Metastatic cancer; CANCER AMERICAN SOCIETY; ENDOCRINE THERAPY; EXPRESSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.humpath.2021.08.007
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Bone is the most common site of metastasis in breast carcinoma (BC). Treatments for metastatic BC depend on various factors, including the tumor's estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 status. Bone biopsies require decalcification which may affect the accuracy of ER and PR immunohistochemistry (IHC) and HER2 situ hybridization (FISH) studies. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) decalcifying solutions have been theorized to have no significant impact on ER and PR IHC or HER2 FISH analyses. We completed a prospective study of the effect of EDTA decalcification on ER and PR IHC and HER2 FISH in 29 cases of BC. Samples from 29 BC resections were collected and formalin fixed between 12 and 24 h. Control samples were routinely processed, whereas test samples were placed in EDTA for 48 h. ER and PR slides were blinded, randomized, and evaluated. Blinded samples underwent HER2 FISH assays where an average HER2 copy number and HER2/CEP17 ratio were calculated. Paired differences between EDTA and control samples were compared for ER and PR positivity, average HER2 copy number, and HER2/CEP17 ratios using paired-samples t-tests (PST) and Wilcoxon signed-rank test (WSR). PST and WSR tests yielded no significant difference between EDTA and control tissue for ER% (PST: Inc1; WSR: P=0.916), PR% (PST: P=0.973; WSR: P=0.984), HER2 copy number (PST: P=0.124; WSR: P=0.103), and HER2/CEP17 ratio (PST: P=0.25; WSR: P=0.105). The use of EDTA in bony tissue is therefore a valid decalcification method to ensure accurate assessment of ER and PR IHC and HER2 FISH in metastatic BC. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 114
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Breast Cancer Biomarkers Challenges in Routine Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and HER2/neu Evaluation
    Jorns, Julie M.
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2019, 143 (12) : 1444 - 1449
  • [2] Reliability of Her2/neu, Estrogen Receptor, and Progesterone Receptor Testing by Immunohistochemistry on Cell Block of FNA and Serous Effusions From Patients With Primary and Metastatic Breast Carcinoma
    Shabaik, Ahmed
    Lin, Grace
    Peterson, Michael
    Hasteh, Farnaz
    Tipps, Ann
    Datnow, Brian
    Weidner, Noel
    DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2011, 39 (05) : 328 - 332
  • [3] Effect of Surface Decalcification With Hydrochloric Acid on the Determination of Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, Ki67, and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Expressions in Invasive Breast Carcinoma Based on Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization
    Ping, Wu
    Xin, Rao
    Li, Zhang
    Chen, Yupeng
    Song, Fangling
    Ren, Caihong
    Shun, Hu
    Sheng, Zhang
    APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2023, 31 (04) : 232 - 238
  • [4] Estrogen, progesterone, and HER2/neu receptor discordance between primary and metastatic breast tumours-a review
    Yeung, C.
    Hilton, J.
    Clemons, M.
    Mazzarello, S.
    Hutton, B.
    Haggar, F.
    Addison, C. L.
    Kuchuk, I.
    Zhu, X.
    Gelmon, K.
    Arnaout, A.
    CANCER AND METASTASIS REVIEWS, 2016, 35 (03) : 427 - 437
  • [5] Issues and updates: evaluating estrogen receptor-α, progesterone receptor, and HER2 in breast cancer
    Allred, D. Craig
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2010, 23 : S52 - S59
  • [6] Progesterone receptor status in determining the prognosis of estrogen receptor positive/HER2 negative breast carcinoma patients
    Bal, Oznur
    Arslan, Ulku Yalcintas
    Durnali, Ayse
    Uyetrk, Ummugul
    Demirci, Ayse
    Tastekin, Didem
    Ekinci, Ahmet
    Esbah, Onur
    Turker, Ibrahim
    Sonmez, Ozlem Uysal
    Oksuzoglu, Berna
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2015, 20 (01): : 28 - 34
  • [7] FISH and HER2/neu equivocal immunohistochemistry in breast carcinoma
    Okaly, Geeta Vikram Patil
    Panwar, Dipti
    Lingappa, Kavitha Bidadli
    Kumari, Prasanna
    Anand, Abhishek
    Kumar, Prashantha
    Chikkalingaiah, Manju Hosur
    Kumar, Rekha Vijay
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 56 (02) : 119 - 123
  • [8] Cost-effectiveness of a Dual (Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization) HER2/neu Testing Strategy on Invasive Breast Cancers
    Hariri, Nosaibah
    Zare, Somaye
    Murphy, James
    Fadare, Oluwole
    APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2021, 29 (01) : 42 - 48
  • [9] Effect of fixation period on HER2/neu gene amplification detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization in invasive breast carcinoma
    Selvarajan, S
    Bay, BH
    Choo, A
    Chuah, KL
    Sivaswaren, CR
    Tien, SL
    Wong, CY
    Tan, PH
    JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY, 2002, 50 (12) : 1693 - 1696
  • [10] Estrogen receptor α and β, progesterone receptor, pS2 and HER-2/neu expression delineate different subgroups in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast
    Rody, A
    Diallo, R
    Poremba, C
    Speich, R
    Wuelfing, P
    Kissler, S
    Solbach, C
    Kiesel, L
    Jackisch, C
    ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2004, 12 (04) : 695 - 699