Effect of EDTA decalcification on estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor immunohistochemistry and HER2/neu fluorescence in situ hybridization in breast carcinoma

被引:8
作者
Washburn, Erik [1 ]
Tang, Xiaoyu [1 ,2 ]
Caruso, Carla [1 ,3 ]
Walls, Michelle [1 ]
Han, Bing [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Hlth Hershey Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
[2] Geisinger Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, 100 N Acad Ave, Danville, PA 17822 USA
[3] Univ Missouri, Dept Pathol, 1 Hosp Dr,Off N305c, Columbia, MO 65212 USA
关键词
Immunohistochemistry; Decalcification agents; EDTA; In situ hybridization; Bone biopsies; Metastatic cancer; CANCER AMERICAN SOCIETY; ENDOCRINE THERAPY; EXPRESSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.humpath.2021.08.007
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Bone is the most common site of metastasis in breast carcinoma (BC). Treatments for metastatic BC depend on various factors, including the tumor's estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 status. Bone biopsies require decalcification which may affect the accuracy of ER and PR immunohistochemistry (IHC) and HER2 situ hybridization (FISH) studies. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) decalcifying solutions have been theorized to have no significant impact on ER and PR IHC or HER2 FISH analyses. We completed a prospective study of the effect of EDTA decalcification on ER and PR IHC and HER2 FISH in 29 cases of BC. Samples from 29 BC resections were collected and formalin fixed between 12 and 24 h. Control samples were routinely processed, whereas test samples were placed in EDTA for 48 h. ER and PR slides were blinded, randomized, and evaluated. Blinded samples underwent HER2 FISH assays where an average HER2 copy number and HER2/CEP17 ratio were calculated. Paired differences between EDTA and control samples were compared for ER and PR positivity, average HER2 copy number, and HER2/CEP17 ratios using paired-samples t-tests (PST) and Wilcoxon signed-rank test (WSR). PST and WSR tests yielded no significant difference between EDTA and control tissue for ER% (PST: Inc1; WSR: P=0.916), PR% (PST: P=0.973; WSR: P=0.984), HER2 copy number (PST: P=0.124; WSR: P=0.103), and HER2/CEP17 ratio (PST: P=0.25; WSR: P=0.105). The use of EDTA in bony tissue is therefore a valid decalcification method to ensure accurate assessment of ER and PR IHC and HER2 FISH in metastatic BC. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 114
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Effect of bone decalcification procedures on DNA in situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization: EDTA is highly preferable to a routinely used acid decalcifier [J].
Alers, JC ;
Krijtenburg, PJ ;
Vissers, KJ ;
van Dekken, H .
JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY, 1999, 47 (05) :703-709
[2]   Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Testing in Breast Cancer American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Update [J].
Allison, Kimberly H. ;
Hammond, M. Elizabeth H. ;
Dowsett, Mitchell ;
McKernin, Shannon E. ;
Carey, Lisa A. ;
Fitzgibbons, Patrick L. ;
Hayes, Daniel F. ;
Lakhani, Sunil R. ;
Chavez-MacGregor, Mariana ;
Perlmutter, Jane ;
Perou, Charles M. ;
Regan, Meredith M. ;
Rimm, David L. ;
Symmans, W. Fraser ;
Torlakovic, Emina E. ;
Varella, Leticia ;
Viale, Giuseppe ;
Weisberg, Tracey F. ;
McShane, Lisa M. ;
Wolff, Antonio C. .
ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2020, 144 (05) :545-563
[3]  
Allred DC, 1998, MODERN PATHOL, V11, P155
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines Version 4.2018 Breast Cancer
[5]   Proposal of an Appropriate Decalcification Method of Bone Marrow Biopsy Specimens in the Era of Expanding Genetic Molecular Study [J].
Choi, Sung-Eun ;
Hong, Soon Won ;
Yoon, Sun Och .
JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY AND TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2015, 49 (03) :236-242
[6]   Clinical features of metastatic bone disease and risk of skeletal morbidity [J].
Coleman, Robert E. .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2006, 12 (20) :6243S-6249S
[7]   Impact of Decalcification on Receptor Status in Breast Cancer [J].
Darvishian, Farbod ;
Singh, Baljit ;
Krauter, Stephanie ;
Chiriboga, Luis ;
Gangi, Maryann D. ;
Melamed, Jonathan .
BREAST JOURNAL, 2011, 17 (06) :689-691
[8]   NCCN Guidelines® Insights Breast Cancer, Version 1.2017 Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines [J].
Gradishar, William J. ;
Anderson, Benjamin O. ;
Balassanian, Ron ;
Blair, Sarah L. ;
Burstein, Harold J. ;
Cyr, Amy ;
Elias, Anthony D. ;
Farrar, William B. ;
Forero, Andres ;
Giordano, Sharon Hermes ;
Goetz, Matthew P. ;
Goldstein, Lori J. ;
Isakoff, Steven J. ;
Lyons, Janice ;
Marcom, P. Kelly ;
Mayer, Ingrid A. ;
McCormick, Beryl ;
Moran, Meena S. ;
O'Regan, Ruth M. ;
Patel, Sameer A. ;
Pierce, Lori J. ;
Reed, Elizabeth C. ;
Salerno, Kilian E. ;
Schwartzberg, Lee S. ;
Sitapati, Amy ;
Smith, Karen Lisa ;
Smith, Mary Lou ;
Soliman, Hatem ;
Somlo, George ;
Telli, Melinda ;
Ward, John H. ;
Shead, Dorothy A. ;
Kumar, Rashmi .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2017, 15 (04) :433-+
[9]   Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer [J].
Harvey, JM ;
Clark, GM ;
Osborne, CK ;
Allred, DC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (05) :1474-1481
[10]   US Incidence of Breast Cancer Subtypes Defined by Joint Hormone Receptor and HER2 Status [J].
Howlader, Nadia ;
Altekruse, Sean F. ;
Li, Christopher I. ;
Chen, Vivien W. ;
Clarke, Christina A. ;
Ries, Lynn A. G. ;
Cronin, Kathleen A. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2014, 106 (05)