Defining blockchain governance principles: A comprehensive framework

被引:16
作者
Liu, Yue [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Qinghua [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Guangsheng [1 ]
Paik, Hye-Young [2 ]
Zhu, Liming [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO, Data61, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Sch Comp Sci & Engn, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Blockchain; Governance; Decision rights; Accountability; Incentive; Ecosystem;
D O I
10.1016/j.is.2022.102090
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Blockchain eliminates the need for trusted third-party intermediaries in business by enabling decentralised architecture design in software applications. However, the vulnerabilities in on-chain autonomous decision-makings and cumbersome off-chain coordination lead to serious concerns about blockchain's ability to behave in a trustworthy and efficient way. Blockchain governance has received considerable attention to support the decision-making process during the use and evolution of blockchain. Nevertheless, the conventional governance frameworks do not apply to blockchain due to its distributed architecture and decentralised decision process. These inherent features lead to the absence of a clear source of authority in blockchain ecosystem. Currently, there is a lack of systematic guidance on the governance of blockchain. Therefore, in this paper, we present a comprehensive blockchain governance framework, which elucidates an integrated view of the degree of decentralisation, decision rights, incentives, accountability, ecosystem, and legal and ethical responsibilities. The above aspects are formulated as six high-level principles for blockchain governance. We demonstrate a qualitative analysis of the proposed framework, including case studies on five extant blockchain platforms, and comparison with existing blockchain governance frameworks. The results show that our proposed framework is feasible and applicable in a real-world context. (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [1] Blockchain Governance: What We Can Learn from the Economics of Corporate Governance
    Allen, Darcy W. E.
    Berg, Chris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH BLOCKCHAIN ASSOCIATION, 2020, 3 (01) : 46 - 52
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2017, ISO/IEC/IEEE 12207:2017
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, Standard ISO/IEC 38505-1:2017
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2004, IT GOVERNANCE ONE PA
  • [5] A Survey of Attacks on Ethereum Smart Contracts (SoK)
    Atzei, Nicola
    Bartoletti, Massimo
    Cimoli, Tiziana
    [J]. PRINCIPLES OF SECURITY AND TRUST (POST 2017), 2017, 10204 : 164 - 186
  • [6] Ballard C., 2014, IBM information governance solutions
  • [7] Bao Z., 2019, P 2019 INT ELECT COM, P139, DOI [10.1145/3343147.3343170, DOI 10.1145/3343147.3343170]
  • [8] Governance in the Blockchain Economy: A Framework and Research Agenda
    Beck, Roman
    Muller-Bloch, Christoph
    King, John Leslie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2018, 19 (10): : 1020 - 1034
  • [9] Bitcoin, 2022, BITC BUS
  • [10] Bitcoin, 2022, FREQ ASK QUEST