Practice patterns of multidisciplinary team meetings in Korean cancer care and patient satisfaction with this approach

被引:9
作者
Maeng, Chi Hoon [1 ]
Ahn, Hee Kyung [2 ]
Oh, Sung Yong [3 ]
Lim, Seungtaek [4 ]
Kim, Bong-Seog [5 ]
Kim, Do Yeun [6 ]
机构
[1] Kyung Hee Univ Hosp, Dept Med Oncol & Hematol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Gachon Univ, Dept Oncol, Gil Med Ctr, Incheon, South Korea
[3] Dong A Univ, Dept Hematol Oncol, Coll Med, Busan, South Korea
[4] Wonju Severance Christian Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Wonju, South Korea
[5] Vet Hlth Serv Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Dongguk Univ, Dept Internal Med, Ilsan Hosp, 27 Dongguk Ro, Goyang 10326, South Korea
关键词
Multidisciplinary team; Patient satisfaction; Treatment outcome; Medical oncology; TUMOR BOARD; NATIONAL-SURVEY; MANAGEMENT; IMPACT; MALIGNANCIES; ONCOLOGISTS; ASSOCIATION; ADHERENCE; OUTCOMES; HEAD;
D O I
10.3904/kjim.2019.189
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/Aims: The multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach is a cornerstone of clinical oncology. This study investigated the current state of MDT care, including patient satisfaction, in Korea. Methods: We obtained the annual number of cancer patients who have received MDT care since 2014 from the registry of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA). In addition, patients who received MDT care from August 2014 to May 2017 at four university hospitals were further characterized, and patient satisfaction was measured prospectively using a patient-reported questionnaire. Results: The total number of patients who received MDT care increased from 2014 to 2016 (2,113 to 9,998 patients, respectively) in the HIRA Cohort. The type of cancer that most often required MDT was breast cancer (23.8%), followed by colorectal cancer (19.1%). In the Representative Cohort (n = 1,032), MDT was requested by the surgeon more than half the time (55.7%). The main focus of MDT was decision making for further treatment planning (99.0%). The number of doctors participating in the MDT was usually five (70.0%). After initiating an MDT approach, the treatment plan changed for 17.4% of patients. Among these patients, 359 completed a prospective satisfaction survey regarding their MDT care. The overall satisfaction with the MDT approach was very high, with an average score of 9.6 out of 10 points. Conclusions: The application of MDT care is a rapidly growing trend in clinical oncology, and shows high patient satisfaction. Further research is needed to determine which types of cancer patients could benefit most from MDT, and to enable MDT care to operate more efficiently so that it may expand successfully throughout Korea.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 214
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Acher Peter L, 2005, Int J Surg, V3, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsu.2005.06.006
[2]   Giving Bad News: A Qualitative Research Exploration [J].
Aein, Fereshteh ;
Delaram, Masoumeh .
IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 16 (06)
[3]   Policy statement on multidisciplinary cancer care [J].
Borras, Josep M ;
Albreht, Tit ;
Audisio, Riccardo ;
Briers, Erik ;
Casali, Paolo ;
Esperou, Helene ;
Grube, Birgitte ;
Hamoir, Marc ;
Henning, Geoffrey ;
Kelly, Joan ;
Knox, Susan ;
Nabal, Maria ;
Pierotti, Marco ;
Lombardo, Claudio ;
van Harten, Wim ;
Poston, Graeme ;
Prades, Joan ;
Sant, Milena ;
Travado, Luzia ;
Valentini, Vincenzo ;
van de Velde, Cornelis ;
van den Bogaert, Saskia ;
van den Bulcke, Marc ;
van Hoof, Elke ;
van den Neucker, Ingrid ;
Wilson, Robin .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 50 (03) :475-480
[4]   Models of Multidisciplinary Cancer Care: Physician and Patient Perceptions in a Comprehensive Cancer Center [J].
Bunnell, Craig A. ;
Weingart, Saul N. ;
Swanson, Scott ;
Mamon, Harvey J. ;
Shulman, Lawrence N. .
JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2010, 6 (06) :283-288
[5]   Does every patient need to be discussed at a multidisciplinary team meeting? [J].
Chinai, N. ;
Bintcliffe, F. ;
Armstrong, E. M. ;
Teape, J. ;
Jones, B. M. ;
Hosie, K. B. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 68 (08) :780-784
[6]   The Multidisciplinary Tumor Conference in Gynecologic Oncology-Does It Alter Management? [J].
Cohen, Paul ;
Tan, Ai Ling ;
Penman, Andrea .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2009, 19 (09) :1470-1472
[7]   The multidisciplinary team meeting improves staging accuracy and treatment selection for gastro-esophageal cancer [J].
Davies, A. R. ;
Deans, D. A. C. ;
Penman, I. ;
Plevris, J. N. ;
Fletcher, J. ;
Wall, L. ;
Phillips, H. ;
Gilmour, H. ;
Patel, D. ;
de Beaux, A. ;
Paterson-Brown, S. .
DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2006, 19 (06) :496-503
[8]   A study of the decision outcomes and financial costs of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDMs) in oncology [J].
De Ieso, P. B. ;
Coward, J. I. ;
Letsa, I. ;
Schick, U. ;
Nandhabalan, M. ;
Frentzas, S. ;
Gore, M. E. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 109 (09) :2295-2300
[9]   The effect of a multidisciplinary thoracic malignancy conference on the treatment of patients with lung cancer [J].
Freeman, Richard K. ;
Van Woerkom, Jaclyn M. ;
Vyverberg, Amy ;
Ascioti, Anthony J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2010, 38 (01) :1-5
[10]   Guidelines: Usefulness and Limitations [J].
Gnant, Michael .
BREAST CARE, 2013, 8 (03) :172-173