Academic Communities of Engagement: an expansive lens for examining support structures in blended and online learning

被引:104
作者
Borup, Jered [1 ]
Graham, Charles R. [2 ]
West, Richard E. [2 ]
Archambault, Leanna [3 ]
Spring, Kristian J. [2 ]
机构
[1] George Mason Univ, 4400 Univ Dr,MS 5D6, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[2] Brigham Young Univ, Provo, UT 84602 USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Tempe, AZ USA
来源
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT | 2020年 / 68卷 / 02期
关键词
Online learning; Blended learning; Student support; Student engagement; Community; Zone of proximal development; STUDENT PERCEPTIONS; PARENT ENGAGEMENT; SCHOOL ENGAGEMENT; TEACHER; ACHIEVEMENT; FACILITATOR; PERSISTENCE; REASONS;
D O I
10.1007/s11423-020-09744-x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In this article we share the Academic Communities of Engagement (ACE) framework, which describes a student's ability to engage affectively, behaviorally, and cognitively in an online or blended course independently and with support. Based on Vygotsky's (Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1978) zone of proximal development, the framework examines how a student's ability to engage in online or blended courses increases with support from two types of communities. The course community is organized and facilitated by those associated with the course or program. The personal community is comprised of actors not officially associated with the course who have typically formed relationships with the student before the course or program began and may extend well beyond its boundaries. Actors within each community have varying skills and abilities to support student engagement, and a student is most likely to reach the necessary engagement for academic success with active support from both. The framework identifies the community actors most likely to provide specific support elements, aligning them to the different types of student engagement. The article outlines implications for practice and research, concluding with illustrative examples.
引用
收藏
页码:807 / 832
页数:26
相关论文
共 87 条
  • [21] Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies
    Dziuban, Charles
    Graham, Charles R.
    Moskal, Patsy D.
    Norberg, Anders
    Sicilia, Nicole
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 15
  • [22] Faller Mary Beth, 2018, ASU NOW
  • [23] FARRELL EF, 2007, CHRONICLE HIGHER ED, V53
  • [24] Ferdig Richard E., 2009, Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, V17, P479
  • [25] Teacher support, student motivation, student need satisfaction, and college teacher course evaluations: testing a sequential path model
    Filak, Vincent F.
    Sheldon, Kennon M.
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 28 (06) : 711 - 724
  • [26] School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence
    Fredricks, JA
    Blumenfeld, PC
    Paris, AH
    [J]. REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 74 (01) : 59 - 109
  • [27] Freidhoff Joseph.R., 2018, Michigan's K-12 Virtual Learning Effectiveness Report 2016-17
  • [28] Garrison D. R., 1999, Internet and Higher Education, V2, P87, DOI 10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
  • [29] Garrison D.R., 2009, Journal of Distance Education, V23, P93
  • [30] Gemin B., 2016, Keeping pace k-12 online learning: An annual review of policy and practice