Monte Carlo parameters in modeling service life: Influence on life-cycle assessment

被引:25
作者
Morales, Michele F. D. [1 ,2 ]
Passuello, Ana [2 ]
Kirchheim, Ana Paula [2 ]
Ries, Robert J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, ME Rinker Sr Sch Construct Management, POB 115703, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Bldg Innovat Res Unit NORIE, Postgrad Program Civil Engn Construct & Infrastru, Av Osvaldo Aranha 99-7 Andar,Sala 706, BR-90035190 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
关键词
Maintenance and repair; Service life; Uncertainty; Monte Carlo simulation; Building element; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; BUILDINGS; EMISSIONS; LCA; SENSITIVITY; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103232
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Service life plays an important role that has a significant influence on life cycle impacts of the building operation phase, especially as operational energy impacts are being reduced through energy efficiency and renewal energy. In this context, uncertainty analysis of service life models is crucial for reliable building Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). The main purpose of this paper is to examine and discuss the influence of the uncertainties of service life models using statistical analysis of Monte Carlo (MC) simulation results of the service life of fifteen different building elements considering eleven different published maintenance, repair, and replacement models from seven countries. Descriptive statistics of the service life data and MC simulation are used to identify the variability, quantify the uncertainties, and identify the best fit distributions for service life data. The results highlight the differences between the models, indicating the need to choose the most appropriate for the purpose and context of the LCA or Life Cycle Cost (LCC) study, as this choice will likely affect the results. Describing the potential range of values is useful as it improves decision-making in LCA and/or LCC analysis. Three distributions were found to be suitable for MC simulation of service life: gamma, lognormal and Weibull. In general, for a 90% confidence interval, the lognormal distribution returns a shorter service life (between the upper and lower quartile) than gamma and Weibull.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Energy use during the life cycle of buildings: A method [J].
Adalberth, K .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 1997, 32 (04) :317-320
[2]   Impact of lifetime on US residential building LCA results [J].
Aktas, Can B. ;
Bilec, Melissa M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2012, 17 (03) :337-349
[3]   Recent developments, future challenges and new research directions in LCA of buildings: A critical review [J].
Anand, Chirjiv Kaur ;
Amor, Ben .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 67 :408-416
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Int J Life Cycle Assess, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF02979835, 10.1007/BF02979835]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, MIN STAT SOFTW 18
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, INT REFERENCE LIFE C, DOI DOI 10.2788/38479
[7]  
ASTM International, 2015, E155709 ASTM INT
[8]  
Athena Institute Morrison Hershfield, 2006, SERV LIF CONS REL GR
[9]  
Bahr C., 2010, Lebens- und Nutzungsdauer von BauteilenEndbericht
[10]   Comparing sources and analysis of uncertainty in consequential and attributional life cycle assessment: review of current practice and recommendations [J].
Bamber, Nicole ;
Turner, Ian ;
Arulnathan, Vivek ;
Li, Yang ;
Zargar Ershadi, Shiva ;
Smart, Alyssa ;
Pelletier, Nathan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (01) :168-180