Global incidence of incomplete surgical excision in adult patients with non-melanoma skin cancer: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

被引:8
作者
Nolan, Grant S. [1 ,2 ]
Wormald, Justin C. R. [3 ,4 ]
Kiely, Ailbhe L. [5 ]
Totty, Joshua P. [6 ]
Jain, Abhilash [3 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Royal Free Hosp, Div Surg & Intervent Sci, Pond St, London NW3 2QG, England
[2] St Helens & Knowsley Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Whiston Hosp, Warrington Rd, Prescot L35 5DR, Merseyside, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Orthopaed Rheumatol & Musculoskelet, Roosevelt Dr, Oxford OX3 7LD, England
[4] Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Stoke Mandeville Hosp, Mandeville Rd, Aylesbury HP21 8AL, Bucks, England
[5] Royal Stoke Univ Hosp, Newcastle Rd, Stoke On Trent ST4 6QG, Staffs, England
[6] Hull Univ Teaching Hosp, Castle Hill Hosp, Castle Rd, Cottingham HU16 5JQ, East Riding Of, England
关键词
Skin neoplasia; Carcinoma; Basal Cell; Squamous Cell; Margins of excision; Systematic review; BASAL-CELL CARCINOMAS; MANAGEMENT; PREVALENCE; GUIDELINES; MARGINS; AUDIT;
D O I
10.1186/s13643-020-01350-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Non-melanoma skin cancer, which includes basal cell carcinoma and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, is the commonest malignancy worldwide. The mainstay of treatment is surgical excision. Despite this being an exceptionally common procedure, it is not known what the accepted standard is for incomplete excision. Multiple single-centre, regional and national studies have previously reported their incidence of incomplete excision in isolation. Furthermore, is it not known what effect potential risk factors such as the operating group, location of lesions, type of reconstruction, histological components or use of loupe magnification have on the incidence of incomplete excisions. The objective of this study will be to systematically evaluate observational data that present incidence of incomplete surgical excision amongst adult patients with non-melanoma skin cancer worldwide. Methods We designed and registered a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of descriptive epidemiology data. A comprehensive literature search will be conducted (from January 2000 onwards) in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, EMCare and Cochrane Library. Grey literature will be identified through searching Open Grey, dissertation databases (e.g. Open Access Theses and Dissertations) and clinical trial registers (e.g. WHO ICTRP). Observational studies (cohort, cross-sectional, case series and clinical audits) reporting the incidence of incomplete surgical excision and conducted in adult patients with non-melanoma skin cancer will be included. The primary outcome will be the incidence of incomplete surgical excision (defined as residual tumour at either the peripheral or deep margin). Secondary outcomes will be risk factors that may affect incomplete excision (e.g. operating group, location of lesions, types of reconstruction, histological components). Data will not be extracted if the study uses other surgical techniques such as Mohs micrographic surgery, intra-operative frozen section, incision, shave or punch biopsies. Two investigators will independently screen all citations, full-text articles and abstract data. Potential conflicts will be resolved through discussion. No limitations will be imposed on publication status or language of publication. The study methodological quality (or bias) will be appraised using an appropriate tool. If feasible, we will conduct a random effect meta-analysis of observational data. Incidence estimates will be stratified according to cancer type (e.g. basal cell carcinoma vs squamous cell carcinoma) and operating group (e.g. dermatology, plastic surgery and general practice). Additional analyses will be conducted to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity (e.g. methodological quality, sample size). Discussion This systematic review will summarise the best available evidence and definitively establish the incidence of incomplete surgical excision in non-melanoma skin cancer. It will determine if there is variation observed amongst different operating groups and provide some evidence for potential other factors causing this difference. This knowledge will provide a standard for future audits and will contribute to improving the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancer treatment. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42019157936
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Reporting and Replicating Trials of Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Do We Know What the Researchers Actually Did?
    Abell, Bridget
    Glasziou, Paul
    Hoffmann, Tammy
    [J]. CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2015, 8 (02): : 187 - +
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2019, DIS SPECIFIC QUALITY
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, NONM SKIN CANC ENGL
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2013, 2013 14 NHS STANDARD
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2013, NONM SKIN CANC INC M
  • [6] SURGICAL MARGINS FOR EXCISION OF PRIMARY CUTANEOUS SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA
    BRODLAND, DG
    ZITELLI, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1992, 27 (02) : 241 - 248
  • [7] Chang A, 1998, Ostomy Wound Manage, V44, P26
  • [8] Postburn scar carcinomas in Kashmiris
    Chowdri, NA
    Darzi, MA
    [J]. BURNS, 1996, 22 (06) : 477 - 482
  • [9] METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS
    DERSIMONIAN, R
    LAIRD, N
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03): : 177 - 188
  • [10] The specialty of the treating physician affects the likelihood of tumor-free resection margins for basal cell carcinoma: Results from a multi-institutional retrospective study
    Fleischer, AB
    Feldman, SR
    Barlow, JO
    Zheng, BY
    Hahn, HB
    Chuang, TY
    Draft, KS
    Golitz, LE
    Wu, E
    Katz, AS
    Maize, JC
    Knapp, T
    Leshin, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2001, 44 (02) : 224 - 230