The new Green Revolution: Sustainable intensification of agriculture by intercropping

被引:370
作者
Martin-Guay, Marc-Olivier [1 ,2 ]
Paquette, Alain [3 ]
Dupras, Jerome [1 ,2 ]
Rivest, David [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] UQO, Dept Sci Nat, 58 Rue Principale, Ripon J0V 1V0, PQ, Canada
[2] UQO, Inst Sci Foret Temperee ISFORT, 58 Rue Principale, Ripon J0V 1V0, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Quebec, Dept Sci Biol, CP 8888,Succursale Ctr Ville, Montreal QCH3C 3P8, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Farmer gross incomes; Global meta-analysis; Harvested gross energy; Intercropping; Land equivalent ratio; Land sparing; Relative land output; LAND EQUIVALENT RATIO; BIODIVERSITY EXPERIMENTS; METAANALYSIS; NITROGEN; PRODUCTIVITY; SYSTEMS; DEMAND; LEGUME; POPULATION; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.024
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Satisfying the nutritional needs of a growing population whilst limiting environmental repercussions will require sustainable intensification of agriculture. We argue that intercropping, which is the simultaneous production of multiple crops on the same area of land, could play an essential role in this intensification. We carried out the first global meta-analysis on the multifaceted benefits of intercropping. The objective of this study was to determine the benefits of intercropping in terms of energetic, economic and land-sparing potential through the framework of the stress-gradient hypothesis. We expected more intercropping benefits under stressful abiotic conditions. From 126 studies that were retrieved from the scientific literature, 939 intercropping observations were considered. When compared to the same area of land that was managed in monoculture, intercrops produced 38% more gross energy (mean relative land output of 1.38) and 33% more gross incomes (mean relative land output of 1.33) on average, whilst using 23% less land (mean land equivalent ratio of 1.30). Irrigation and the aridity index in non-irrigated intercrops did not affect land equivalent ratio, thereby indicating that intercropping remains beneficial, both under stressful and non-stressful contexts concerning moisture availability. Fertilisation and intercropping patterns (rows and strips vs. mixed) did not affect land equivalent ratio. Although intercropping offers a great opportunity for intensification of existing agricultural lands, many challenges need to be tackled by experts from multiple disciplines to ensure its feasible implementation. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:767 / 772
页数:6
相关论文
共 51 条
[21]   World population stabilization unlikely this century [J].
Gerland, Patrick ;
Raftery, Adrian E. ;
Sevcikova, Hana ;
Li, Nan ;
Gu, Danan ;
Spoorenberg, Thomas ;
Alkema, Leontine ;
Fosdick, Bailey K. ;
Chunn, Jennifer ;
Lalic, Nevena ;
Bay, Guiomar ;
Buettner, Thomas ;
Heilig, Gerhard K. ;
Wilmoth, John .
SCIENCE, 2014, 346 (6206) :234-237
[22]  
Hedges LV, 1999, ECOLOGY, V80, P1150, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1150:TMAORR]2.0.CO
[23]  
2
[24]   A meta-analysis of intercropping in Africa: impacts on crop yield, farmer income, and integrated pest management effects [J].
Himmelstein, J. ;
Ares, A. ;
Gallagher, D. ;
Myers, J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 15 (01) :1-10
[25]  
Huang W-Y., 2007, IMPACT RISING NATURA
[26]   Do polycultures promote win-wins or trade-offs in agricultural ecosystem services? A meta-analysis [J].
Iverson, Aaron L. ;
Marin, Linda E. ;
Ennis, Katherine K. ;
Gonthier, David J. ;
Connor-Barrie, Benjamin T. ;
Remfert, Jane L. ;
Cardinale, Bradley J. ;
Perfecto, Ivette .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2014, 51 (06) :1593-1602
[27]   Are mixed populations of plant species more productive than pure stands? [J].
Jolliffe, PA .
OIKOS, 1997, 80 (03) :595-602
[28]  
Kamil B., 2016, MUMIN MULTIMODEL INF
[29]   Green revolution: the way forward [J].
Khush, GS .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2001, 2 (10) :815-822
[30]  
Lajeunesse M.J., 2013, Handbook of meta-analysis in ecology and evolution, P195, DOI DOI 10.23943/PRINCETON/9780691137285.003.0013