Comparison of different toothbrushing protocols in poor-toothbrushing orthodontic patients

被引:34
作者
Arici, Selim
Alkan, Arzu
Arici, Nursel
机构
[1] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, TR-55139 Kurupelit, Samsun, Turkey
[2] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Periodontol, TR-55139 Kurupelit, Samsun, Turkey
[3] Private Practice, Samsun, Turkey
关键词
D O I
10.1093/ejo/cjm038
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to determine, using a computerized image analysing system, whether the use of a curved-bristle toothbrush (CBT) alone is more effective than two other toothbrushing protocols on dental plaque elimination in poor-toothbrushing orthodontic patients. The labial surfaces of the maxillary canine-to-canine anterior teeth of 30 patients (12 males and 18 females) were individually photographed following dental plaque staining before and 4 weeks after each toothbrushing protocol, with a 1-month washout interval. The toothbrushes used were (1) a CBT, (2) an orthodontic toothbrush (OT), and (3) an OT in combination with interproximal toothbrush (IT) (OT + IT). Total labial surfaces of the anterior teeth and stained plaque areas were measured and gingival indices (GIs) were also recorded. Repeated measures analysis of variance and Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference multiple range tests showed that the OT + IT produced a statistically significant decrease in the mean plaque percentage both for the total labial (7.2%) and interproximal (17.7%) tooth surfaces, when compared with the other toothbrushing protocols (P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found between the CBT and OT for the amount of bacterial plaque and GI scores (P > 0.05). Neither the CBT nor the OT alone was able to remove plaque under the archwires in poor-toothbrushing patients. Therefore, the use of ITs should be mandatory for effective plaque removal in these patients.
引用
收藏
页码:488 / 492
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
AVERY KD, 1984, J DENTISTRY CHILDREN, V51, P371
[2]  
Berglund L J, 1990, J Clin Orthod, V24, P315
[3]   EFFECT OF ROTARY ELECTRIC TOOTHBRUSH VERSUS MANUAL TOOTHBRUSH ON PERIODONTAL STATUS DURING ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT [J].
BOYD, RL ;
MURRAY, P ;
ROBERTSON, PB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1989, 96 (04) :342-347
[4]   An evaluation of the efficacy of a curved bristle and conventional toothbrush. A comparative clinical study [J].
Chava, VK .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2000, 71 (05) :785-789
[6]   Nonsurgical periodontal therapy [J].
Drisko, CH .
PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2001, 25 :77-88
[8]   Comparative study of electric and manual toothbrushes in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances [J].
Heasman, P ;
Wilson, Z ;
Macgregor, I .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1998, 114 (01) :45-49
[9]   Effectiveness of three different types of electric toothbrushes compared with a manual technique in orthodontic patients [J].
Heintze, SD ;
JostBrinkmann, PG ;
Loundos, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1996, 110 (06) :630-638
[10]   EFFECT OF AN ORAL IRRIGATING DEVICE ON ORAL HYGIENE OF ORTHODONTIC PATIENTS [J].
HURST, JE ;
MADONIA, JV .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1970, 81 (03) :678-&